Library and information resources and users of digital resources in the humanities

Program

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-27

  Warwick, Claire ^a   Terras, Melissa ^a   Galina, Isabel ^a   Huntington, Paul ^a   Pappa, Nikoleta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Information management; Libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449129847     PISSN: 00330337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00330330810851555     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams, A. and Sasse, M.A. (1999), “Users are not the enemy: why users compromise security mechanisms and how to take remedial measures”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42 No. 12, pp. 40-46.
2. Albitz, P. and Liu, C. (2006), DNS and BIND, 5th ed., O'Reilly, Sebastapol, CA.
3. Anderson, I.G. (2004), “‘Are you being served?’ Historians and the search for primary sources”, Archivaria, Vol. 58, pp. 81-130, available at: http://archivists.ca/downloads/documentloader.aspx?id=3661 (accessed 5 October 2007).
4. Barrett, A. (2005), “The information seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 324-31.
5. Bates, M.J. (1996), “The Getty end-user online searching project in the humanities: report no 6: overview and conclusions”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 57 No. 6, pp. 514-523.
6. Bates, M.J. (2002), “The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 381-400.
7. British Academy (2005), “E-resources for research in the humanities and social sciences: a British Academy policy review”, available at: www.britac.ac.uk/reports/eresources/report/ (accessed 5 October 2007).
8. Brown, S., Ross, R., Gerrard, D., Greengrass, M. and Bryson, J. (2007), “RePAH: a user requirements analysis for portals in the arts and humanities”, Arts and Humanities Research Council, available at: http://repah.dmu.ac.uk/report/pdfs/RePAHReport-Complete.pdf (accessed 5 October 2007).
9. Chu, C.M. (1999), “Literary critics at work and their information needs: a research-phases model”, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 247-73.
10. Crane, G. (2006), “What do you do with a million books?”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 3.
11. Cronin, B. (1998), “Information professionals in the digital age”, International Information and Library Review, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 37-50.
12. Curtis, P. (2005), “Bangor librarians face internet threat”, Guardian Unlimited, 16 February, available at: www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1415830,00.html (accessed 5 October 2007).
13. Dalton, M.S. and Charnigo, L. (2004), “Historians and their information sources”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 400-425.
14. Duff, W.M. and Cherry, J.M. (2001), “Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche”, Information Research, Vol. 6 No. 1, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/6-1/paper86.html (accessed 5 October 2007).
15. Duff, W., Craig, B. and Cherry, J. (2004), “Historians' use of archival sources: promises and pitfalls of the digital age”, Public Historian, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 7-22.
16. Ellis, D. and Oldman, H. (2005), “The English literature researcher in the age of the internet”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 29-36.
17. Fourie, I. (1999), “Should we take disintermediation seriously?”, Electronic Library, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 9-16.
18. Gellman, R. (1996), “Disintermediation and the internet”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-8.
19. Green, R. (2000), “Locating sources in humanities scholarship: the efficacy of following bibliographic references”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 201-29.
20. Harley, D. and Henke, J. (2007), “Toward an effective understanding of website users: advantages and pitfalls of linking transaction log analyses and online surveys”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 Nos 3 / 4, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/harley/03harley.html (accessed 5 October 2007).
21. Herman, E. (2001), “End-users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age. Part 2 Innovative information-accessing opportunities and the researcher: user acceptance of IT-based information resources in academia”, Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 53 No. 10, pp. 431-57.
22. Huntington, P., Nicholas, D., Williams, P. and Gunter, B. (2002), “Characterising the health information consumer: an examination of the health information sources used by digital television users”, Libri, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 16-27.
23. Huxley, L., Mullings, C., Hodos, T. and Jones, D. (2007), Gathering Evidence: Current ICT Use and Future Needs for Arts and Humanities Researchers, Arts and Humanities Research Council, London.
24. IHR (2006), Peer Review and Evaluation of Digital Resources in the Arts and Humanities, Arts and Humanities Research Council, London, available at: www.history.ac.uk/digit/peer/Peer_review_report2006.pdf
25. Jubb, M. and Green, R. (2007), “Researchers' use of academic libraries and their services”, Research Information Network and Consortium of Research Libraries in the British Isles, available at: www.rin.ac.uk/files/libraries-report-2007.pdf (accessed 5 October 2007).
26. Lehmann, S. and Renfro, P. (1991), “Humanists and electronic information services: acceptance and resistance”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 52 No. 5, pp. 403-13.
27. Lin, W.T. and Shao, B.B.M. (2006), “The business value of information technology and inputs substitution: the productivity paradox revisited”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 493-507.
28. Liu, Z. and Stork, D. (2000), “Is paperless really more? Rethinking the role of paper in the digital age”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42 No. 11, pp. 94-7.
29. Marty, P.F. (2007), “The digital museum in the life of the user”, paper presented at Digital Humanities, 2007, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, IL, 5-8 June, available at: www.digitalhumanities.org/dh2007/abstracts/xhtml.xq?id=138 (accessed 5 October 2007).
30. MLA (2007), “MLA task force on evaluating scholarship for tenure and promotion”, available at: www.mla.org/tenure_promotion (accessed 5 October 2007).
31. Pappa, N., Warwick, C., Terras, M. and Huntington, P. (2006), “The (in)visibility of digital humanities resources in academic contexts”, paper presented at Digital Humanities 2006, Paris, 5-9 July 2006.
32. Reid, G. (2000), “The digitisation of heritage material: arguing for an interpretative approach based on the experience of the Powys Digital History Project”, Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 143-58.
33. Rimmer, J., Warwick, C., Blandford, A., Gow, J. and Buchanan, G. (2006), “User requirements for humanities digital libraries”, paper presented at Digital humanities 2006, University Paris, Sorbonne, 5-9 July, available at: www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/docs/jrcwabjggbDH2006preprint.pdf (accessed 5 October 2007).
34. ScienceWatch (1999), “Citations reveal concentrated influence: some fields have it, but what does it mean?”, ScienceWatch, available at: www.sciencewatch.com/jan-feb99/sw_jan-feb99_page1.htm (accessed 5 October 2007).
35. Shoemaker, R. (2005), “Digital London: creating a searchable web of interlinked sources on eighteenth century London”, Program: electronic library and information systems, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 297-311.
36. Stone, S. (1982), “Humanities scholars: information needs and uses”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 292-313.
37. Talja, S. and Maula, H. (2003), “Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: a domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 673-91.
38. Unsworth, J. (2005), “Pubrarians and liblishers: new roles for old foes”, Keynote address at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Society for Scholarly Publishing, Boston, MA, 2 June.
39. Warwick, C., Terras, M., Huntington, P. and Pappa, N. (2008), “If you build it will they come? The LAIRAH study: quantifying the use of online resources in the arts and humanities through statistical analysis of user log data”, Literary and Linguistic Computing, in press.
40. Watson-Boone, R. (1994), “The information needs and habits of humanities scholars”, Reference Quarterly, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 203-16.
41. Whitmire, E. (2002), “Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behaviour”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 8, pp. 631-8.
42. Wiberley, S.E. (1983), “Subject access in the humanities and the precision of the humanist's vocabulary”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 420-33.
43. Wiberley, S.E. (1988), “Names in space and time: the indexing vocabulary of the humanities”, Library Quarterly, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 1-28.
44. Wiberley, S.E. (2000), “Time and technology”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 61 No. 5, pp. 421-31.