Literary critics at work and their information needs: A research-phases model

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 247-273

  Chu, Clara M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033473229     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00002-X     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrams, M.H. (1997). The transformation of English studies: 1930-1995. Daedalus, 126, 105-131.
2. Barry, Christine A. (1997). The research activity timeline: A qualitative tool for information research. Library & Information Science Research, 19, 153-179.
3. Batts, Michael S. (1972). Citations in the humanities: A study of citation patterns in literary criticism in English, French and German. IPLO Quarterly, 14, 20-40.
4. Beh, Yolanda. (1983). Library and information resources and services for users in language and literature. In Congress of East Asian Librarians, The Library in the Information Revolution (6th Ed). (pp. 500-529). Singapore: Maruzan Asia.
5. Beugnot, Bernard. (1981). La notion de document et la recherche littéraire [Documentation and literary research]. Argus, 10, 19-20.
6. Brown, Jennifer, & Sime, Jonathan. (1981). A methodology for accounts. In M. Brenner (Ed.), Social Method and Social Life (pp. 159-188). London: Academic.
7. Budd, John. (1986a). Characteristics of written scholarship in American literature: A citation study. Library & Information Science Research, 8, 189-211.
8. Budd, John. (1986b). A citation study of american literature: Implications for collection management. Collection Management, 8(2), 49-62.
9. Budd, John. (1990). Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs. Library Quarterly, 60, 337-356.
10. Chu, Clara M. (1992). The Scholarly Process and the Nature of the Information Needs of the Literary Critic: A Descriptive Model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
11. Cullars, John. (1985). Characteristics of the monographic literature of British and American literary studies. College & Research Libraries, 46, 511-522.
12. Cullars, John. (1988). Characteristics of the monographic scholarship of foreign literary studies by native speakers of English. College & Research Libraries, 49, 157-170.
13. Cullars, John. (1989). Citation characteristics of French and German literary monographs. Library Quarterly, 59, 305-325.
14. Dervin, Brenda, & Clark, Kathleen. (1987). ASQ: Alternative Tools for Information Need and Accountability Assessments by Libraries. Belmont, CA: The Peninsula Library System.
15. Dervin, Brenda, & Nilan, Michael. (1986). Information needs and uses. In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (pp. 3-33). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
16. Doland, Virginia. (1984). Portrait of the critic as journal reader: A study of readership patterns among literary scholars. In B. Flood, J. Witiak, & T.H. Hogan (Comps.), Challenges to an Information Society (pp. 222-226). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
17. Frost, Carolyn O. (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly, 49, 399-414.
18. Garvey, William D., Tomita, Kazuo, & Woolf, Patricia. (1979). Appendix H: The dynamic scientific-information user. In W.D. Garvey (Ed.), Communication: The Essence of Science (pp. 256-279). New York: Pergamon.
19. Gleaves, Edwin S., Jr. (1961). Characteristics of the Research Materials Used by Scholars who Write in Journals in the Field of American Literature. Unpublished master's dissertation, Emory University, 1960. (ACRL Microcard, 130).
20. Heinzkill, Richard. (1980). Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals. Library Quarterly, 50, 352-365.
21. Holman, C. Hugh. (1980). A Handbook to Literature (4th Ed). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishers.
22. Hopkins, Richard L. (1988). The Information Seeking Behaviour of Literary Scholars in Canadian Universities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
23. Information Problems in the Humanities. (1975). A report on the British Library seminar (Report No. 5259). West Yorkshire: British Library.
24. Jaaskalainen, Taina. (1985). Viitteiden funktiosta humanistisissa ja muissa tieteissa [Citation functions in humanities and other fields]. Kirjastotiede ja Informatiikka, 4(3), 63-68.
25. Line, Maurice B. (1973). Information and the research process. SSRC Newsletter 20, 18-19.
26. Line, Maurice B. (1974). Information requirements of the social sciences. Access to the Literature of the Social Sciences and Humanities: Proceedings of the Conference on Access to Knowledge and Information in the Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 146-158). Flushing, NY: Queens College Press.
27. Lipking, Lawrence. (1981). Literary criticism. In J. Gibaldi (Ed.), Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures (pp. 79-97). New York: The Modern Languages Association of America.
28. Lönnqvist, Harriet. (1990). Scholars seek information: Information-seeking behaviour and information needs of humanities scholars. Papers presented at the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) 56th General Conference, Joint Workshop Papers, Booklet 7, p. 29. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 329 288).
29. Menzel, Herbert. (1966). Information needs and uses in science and technology. In C. Cuadra (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (pp. 41-69). New York: Interscience Publishers.
30. Menzel, Herbert. (1967). Can science information needs be ascertained empirically? In L. Thayer (Ed.), Communication: Concepts and Perspectives (pp. 279-295). Washington, DC: Spartan Books.
31. Pandit, Idrisa. (1992). Informal Communication in the Humanities: A Qualitative Inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
32. Stern, Madeleine. (1983). Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 44, 199-209.
33. Stone, Sue. (1980). CRUS humanities research programme. In S. Stone (Ed.), Humanities Information Research: Proceedings of a Seminar; Sheffield 1980 (BLR&DD Report No. 5588, pp. 15-26). Sheffield, England: Centre for Research on User Studies, University of Sheffield.
34. Uva, Peter A. (1977). Information-gathering Habits of Academic Historians: Report of the Pilot Study. Syracuse, NY: SUNY Upstate Medical Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 142 483).
35. Watson-Boone, Rebecca. (1994). The information needs and habits of humanities scholars. RQ, 34, 203-216.
36. Webb, Eugene T. et al. (1981). Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences (2nd Ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
37. White, Marilyn Domas. (1975). The communications behavior of academic economists in research phases. Library Quarterly, 45, 337-354.