Should we take disintermediation seriously?

Electronic Library

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 9-16

  Fourie, Ina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; ONLINE SEARCHING;

DISINTERMEDIATION; INFORMATION SEARCHING; INFORMATION SOURCES; INFORMATION SPECIALISTS;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 0002554914     PISSN: 02640473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02640479910329400     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, G. 1996. Disintermediation: a disaster or discipline? Online Information 96, edited by D.I. Raitt. Oxford: Learned Information, pp.29-32.
2. Anon. 1997. The librarian and the library user: what the future holds. The Electronic Library, 15(1): 15-24.
3. Anon. 1995. Studies report who uses Internet and why. Database, 12.
4. Barry 1997. Information Skills for an electronic world: training doctoral research students. Journal of Information Science, 23(3): 225-238.
5. Blinko, B. 1996. Academic staff, students and the Internet: the experience at the University of Westminister. The Electronic Library, 14(2): 111-116.
6. Brody, R. 1993. End-users in 1993: after a decade. Online, May: 66-69.
7. Brooke, W. 1996. New roles for librarians imminent. Information World Review, 52.
8. Campbell, B. 1998. The disintermediation of banks in loan markets. Journal of Lending and Credit Risk Management, 80(5): 56-60.
9. Davies, R. 1996. The information professional in Europe: perceptions and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 48(9): 215-220.
10. Dougherty, D. 1998. Librarians get it: how librarians are shaping the Web. Available http://webreview.com/ 97/07/04/imho/index/html
11. Edwards, C., Day, J and Walton, G. 1996. Disintermediation in the year 2010: using scenarios to identify key issues and relevance of IMPEL eLIb project. Online Information 96, edited by D.I. Raitt. Oxford: Learned Information, pp.357-361.
12. Finlay, K.and Finlay.T. 1996. The relative rôles of knowledge and innovativeness in determining librarians' attitudes toward and use of the Internet: a structural equation modeling approach. Library Quarterly, 66(1): 69-83.
13. Fisher, J. and Bjorner, S. 1994. Enabling online enduser searching: the expanding role of librarians. Special Libraries, 85(4): 281-291.
14. Ford, N., Wood, F. and Walsh, G. 1994. Cognitive styles and searching. Online and CD-ROM Review, 18(2): 79-85.
15. Gellman, R. 1996. Disintermediation and the Internet. Government Information Quarterly, 13(1): 1-8.
16. Harries, S. 1995. The potential of information networks for library and information science education. Online and CD-ROM Review, 19(1): 13-16.
17. Harries, S. 1996. An electronic learning network for continuing professional development in information work. Online and CD-ROM Review, 20(6): 304-306.
18. Hayes, M. 1996. The modern information professional. Online and CD-ROM Review, 20(6): 302-303.
19. Hilts, P. 1995. O'Reilly study maps Internet use. Publishers Weekly, 2 Oct: 11.
20. Jones, J. 1998. Intermediation and the digital library. Available http://www.library.ubc.ca/jones/idl.html
21. Kieft, R.K. 1995. The death of the librarian in the (post) modern electronic information age. In Information for a New Age: Redefining the Librarian, compiled by Fifteenth Anniversary Task Force Library Instruction
22. Round Table American Library Association. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, pp.15-22.
23. Massie, R.J. 1997. The future is now. Information Services and Use, 17:279-282.
24. McDermott. 1998. Searchers on the beachhead: the Internet librarian conference at Monterey. Searcher: The Magazine for Database Professionals> Feb: 62- 68.
25. Mischo, W.H. and Lee, J. 1987. End-user searching of bibliographic databases. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 22: 227-261.
26. Nicholas, D. and Frossling, I 1996, Online Information 96, edited by David I. Raitt. Oxford: Learned Information, 343-347.
27. Radigan, J. 1994. Disintermediation reaches the living room. United States Banker, 104(2): 48-51.
28. Saracevic, T. and Kantor, P. 1991. Online searching: still an imprecise art. Library Journal, 116(16): 47-51.
29. Schulman, S. 1998. Applying a proactive ounce of prevention. Information Today, 15(7): 46.
30. Tenopir, C. 1996. Trends in end user searching. Library Journal, Dec: 35-36.
31. Walker, G. and Janes, J. 1993. Online Retrieval: A Dialogue of Theory and Practice. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
32. Walton, G., Day, J. and Edwards, C. 1996. Role changes the academic librarian to support effectively the networked learner: implications of the IMPEL Project. Education for Information, 14:343-350.