Connectionist models of basic human learning processes

Connectionist Models in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 45-82

  Shanks, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39449093196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203647110     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Alvarado, M. C., & Rudy, J. W. (1992). Some properties of configural learning: An investigation of the transverse-patterning problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 145-153.
2. Alvarado, M. C., & Rudy, J. W. (1995). A comparison of "configural" discrimination problems:Implications for understanding the role of the hippocampal formation in learning and memory. Psychobiology, 23, 178-184.
3. Aydin, A., & Pearce, J. M. (1997). Some determinants of response summation. Animal Learning and Behavior, 25, 108-121.
4. Blaxton, T. A., Zeffiro, T. A., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Bookheimer, S. Y., Carrillo, M. C., Theodore, W. H., et al. (1996). Functional mapping of human learning: A positron emission tomography activation study of eyeblink conditioning. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4032-4040.
5. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
6. Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Chandler, C. C. (1991). How memory for an event is influenced by related events: Interference in modified recognition tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 115-125.
8. Chandler, C. C. (1993). Accessing related events increases retroactive interference in a matching recognition test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 967-974.
9. Chapman, G. B., & Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 18, 537-545.
10. Dickinson, A. (1980). Contemporary animal learning theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dickinson, A. (2001). Causal learning: An associative analysis (The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 3-25.
12. Dickinson, A., Shanks, D. R., & Evenden, J. L. (1984). Judgement of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29-50.
13. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
14. Fletcher, P. C., Anderson, J. M., Shanks, D. R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T. A., Donovan, T., et al. (2001). Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1043-1048.
15. Gallagher, M., & Holland, P. C. (1992). Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus, 2, 81-88.
16. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Gluck, M. A. (1991). Stimulus generalization and representation in adaptive network models of category learning. Psychological Science, 2, 50-55.
18. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1997). Psychobiological models of hippocampal function in learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 481-514.
19. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Hamann, S. B., Squire, L. R., & Schacter, D. L. (1995). Perceptual thresholds and priming in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 9, 3-15.
21. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2, 359-368.
22. Johnstone, T., & Shanks, D. R. (2001). Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 61-112.
23. Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior, 1967: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9-31). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
24. Kohonen, T. (1977). Associative memory: A system theoretical approach. New York: Springer.
25. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
26. Kruschke, J. K. (1993). Human category learning: Implications for backpropagation models. Connection Science, 5, 3-36.
27. Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Gradual unlearning and catastrophic interference: A comparison of distrubuted architectures. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 445-476). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Lober, K., & Shanks, D. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997). Psychological Review, 107, 195-212.
29. López, F. J., Shanks, D. R., Almaraz, J., & Fernández, P. (1998). Effects of trial order on contingency judgments: A comparison of associative and probabilistic contrast accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 672-694.
30. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 109-165). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. McDonald, R. J., Murphy, R. A., Guarraci, F. A., Gortler, J. R., White, N. M., & Baker, A. G. (1997). Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations. Hippocampus, 7, 371-388.
33. McGlinchey-Berroth, R., Brawn, C., & Disterhoft, J. F. (1999). Temporal discrimination learning in severe amnesic patients reveals an alteration in the timing of eyeblink conditioned responses. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 10-18.
34. Medin, D. L., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1981). Linear separability in classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355-368.
35. Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 363-386.
36. Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1969). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Myers, K. M., Vogel, E. H., Shin, J., & Wagner, A. R. (2001). A comparison of the Rescorla-Wagner and Pearce models in a negative patterning and a summation problem. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 36-45.
38. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
39. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory:Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311-345.
40. Ostergaard, A. L., & Jernigan, T. L. (1996). Priming and baseline perceptual identification performance in amnesia: A comment on Hamann, Squire, and Schacter. Neuropsychology, 10, 125-130.
41. Palmeri, T. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 548-568.
42. Parkin, A. J. (1997). Memory and amnesia: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43. Payne, D. G., Toglia, M. P., & Anastasi, J. S. (1994). Recognition performance level and the magnitude of the misinformation effect in eyewitness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 376-382.
44. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
45. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
46. Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 73-95.
47. Pearce, J. M., Aydin, A., & Redhead, E. S. (1997). Configural analysis of summation in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 84-94.
48. Pearce, J. M., & Redhead, E. S. (1993). The influence of an irrelevant stimulus on two discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 180-190.
49. Pearce, J. M., & Wilson, P. N. (1991). Failure of excitatory conditioning to extinguish the influence of a conditioned inhibitor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 519-529.
50. Perales, J. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 977-1007.
51. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21-69.
52. Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285-308.
53. Redhead, E. S., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Similarity and discrimination learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 46-66.
54. Reed, J. M., & Squire, L. R. (1999). Impaired transverse patterning in human amnesia is a special case of impaired memory for two-choice discrimination tasks. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 3-9.
55. Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1993). Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 92-114.
56. Rempel-Clower, N. L., Zola, S. M., Squire, L. R., & Amaral, D. G. (1996). Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5233-5255.
57. Rescorla, R. A. (1997). Summation: Assessment of a configural theory. Animal Learning and Behavior, 25, 200-209.
58. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
59. Rickard, T. C., & Grafman, J. (1998). Losing their configural mind: Amnesic patients fail on transverse patterning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 509-524.
60. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1995). Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus, 5, 375-389.
61. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarla, J. J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 99, 268-305.
62. Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000). Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 473-500.
63. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1-21.
64. Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Shanks, D. R., Charles, D., Darby, R. J., & Azmi, A. (1998a). Configural processes in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1353-1378.
66. Shanks, D. R., Darby, R. J., & Charles, D. (1998b). Resistance to interference in human associative learning: Evidence of configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 136-150.
67. Shanks, D. R., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Tests of an adaptive network model for the identification and categorization of continuous-dimension stimuli. Connection Science, 6, 59-89.
68. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
69. Sloman, S. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Reducing interference in distributed memories through episodic gating. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 1, pp. 227-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
70. Squire, L. R. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 203-231). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Stone, G. O. (1986). An analysis of the delta rule and the learning of statistical associations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing:Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 444-459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Sutherland, R. J., & Rudy, J. W. (1989). Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology, 17, 129-144.
73. Thomas, R. D. (1998). Learning correlations in categorization tasks using large, ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 119-143.
74. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Murphy, R. A., & Baker, A. G. (1998). Causal induction in the presence of a perfect negative cue: Contrasting predictions from associative and statistical models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 173-191.
75. Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Murphy, R. A., Drew, S., & Baker, A. G. (1998). Judging the importance of constant and variable candidate causes: A test of the Power PC theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 65-84.
76. van Gelder, T. (1991). What is the "D" in "PDP"? A survey of the concept of distribution. In W. Ramsey, S. P. Stich & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Philosophy and connectionist theory (pp. 33-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
77. Waelti, P., Dickinson, A., & Schultz, W. (2001). Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature, 412, 43-48.
78. Wagner, A. R., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In R. A. Boakes & M. S. Halliday (Eds.), Inhibition and learning (pp. 301-336). London: Academic Press.
79. Wickelgren, W. A. (1979). Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus cognitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system. Psychological Review, 86, 44-60.
80. Williams, D. A. (1995). Forms of inhibition in animal and human learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 129-142.
81. Williams, D. A. (1996). A comparative analysis of negative contingency learning in humans and nonhumans. In D. R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak & D. L. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Causal learning (Vol. 34, pp. 89-131). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
82. Williams, D. A., & Braker, D. S. (1999). Influence of past experience on the coding of compound stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 461-474.
83. Williams, D. A., Sagness, K. E., & McPhee, J. E. (1994). Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 694-709.
84. Wilson, P. N., & Pearce, J. M. (1992). A configural analysis of feature-negative discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 265-272.