Configural analysis of summation in autoshaping

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 84-94

  Pearce, John M ^a   Aydin, Aydan ^a   Redhead, Edward S ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002905560     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.23.1.84     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aydin, A., & Pearce, J. M. (1994). Prototype effects in categorization by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 264-277.
2. Aydin, A., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Summation in autoshaping with short- and long-duration stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 215-234.
3. Crawford, L. L., Steirn, J. N., & Pavlik, W. B. (1985). Within- and between-subject partial reinforcement effects with an autoshaped response using Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Animal Learning and Behavior, 13, 85-92.
4. Darby, R. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143-154.
5. Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., Locurto, C. M., Duncan, H. J., & Terrace, H. S. (1980). Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 8, 45-59.
6. Hamm, R. J. (1977). A test for response summation with key-projected stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 40-42.
7. Hara, K., & Warren, J. M. (1961). Stimulus additivity and dominance in discrimination performance by cats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 86-90.
8. Hendry, J. S. (1982). Summation of undetected excitation following extinction of the CER. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 476-482.
9. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10. Hull, C. L. (1945). The discrimination of stimulus configurations and the hypothesis of neural afferent interaction. Psychological Review, 52, 133-139.
11. Kehoe, E. J. (1986). Summation and configuration in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 186-195.
12. Kehoe, E. J., & Gormezano, I. (1980). Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 351-378.
13. Kehoe, E. J., & Graham, P. (1988). Summation and configuration: Stimulus compounding and negative patterning in the rabbit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 320-333.
14. Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Long, C. K., & Allen, J. D. (1974). Response summation in the pigeon. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 95-97.
17. McGonigle, B. (1967). Stimulus additivity and dominance in visual discrimination performance by rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64, 110-113.
18. Meltzer, D., & Hamm, R. J. (1976). Response summation in the pigeon. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 515-518.
19. Miller, L. (1971). Compounding of discriminative stimuli from the same and different sensory modalities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 337-342.
20. Miller, L. (1974). Compounding of discriminative stimuli from the same and different sensory modalities which maintain responding on separate levers. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 426-428.
21. Millier, P. J., & Beale, I. L. (1977). Response summation to a compound stimulus in a context of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 17-21.
22. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
23. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
24. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
25. Pearce, J. M., Adam, J., Wilson, P. N., & Darby, R. J. (1992). Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 379-386.
26. Rescorla, R. A., & Coldwell, S. E. (1995). Summation in autoshaping. Animal Learning and Behavior, 23, 314-326.
27. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28. Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427-449.
29. Van Houten, R., O'Leary, K. D., & Weiss, S. J. (1970). Summation of conditioned suppression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 75-81.
30. Wagner, A. R. (1971). Elementary associations. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence (pp. 187-213). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31. Weiss, S. J. (1969). Attentional processes along a composite stimulus continuum during free-operant summation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 22-27.
32. Weiss, S. J. (1971). Discrimination training and stimulus compounding: Consideration of non-reinforcement and response differentiation consequences of SΔ. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 387-402.
33. Weiss, S. J. (1972). Stimulus compounding in free-operant and classical conditioning: A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 189-208.
34. Whitlow, J. W., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configural stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 27, 299-301.