Genomics, ICT and the formation of R&D networks

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 167-185

  Groenewegen, Peter ^a   Wouters, Paul ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DRUG INDUSTRY; GENOME; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 3943075745     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1463677042000237062     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Accenture (2001) R&D and the Internet. Profiting from Innovative, Web-Enabled Pharmaceutical Research & Development 〈http://www. accenture.com/xdoc/en/industries/hls/pharma/randd_the_internet.pdf.
2. Achilladelis, B. & Antonakis, N. (2001) The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the pharmaceutical industry, Research Policy, 30, pp. 535-88.
3. Ahuja, M.K. & Carley, K. (1999) Network structure in virtual organizations, Organization Science, 10, pp. 741-57.
4. Allen, T.J. (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organisation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
5. Arzberger, P., Schroeder, P., Beaulieu, A., Bowker, G., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., Moorman, D., Ulhir, P. & Wouters, P. (2004) Science and government: an international framework to promote access to data, Science, 303(5665), pp. 1777-8.
6. Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T. & Silverman, B.S. (2000) Don't go it alone: alliance network compositions and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 267-94.
7. Beaulieu, A. (Forthcoming, September 2004) From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
8. Boutellier, R., Gassmann, O. et al. (1998) Managers of dispersed product development teams: the role of information technologies, R&D Management, 28, pp. 13-25.
9. Bowker, G.C. & Star, S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
10. Bowker, G.C., Turner, W., Star, S.L. & Glasser, L. (1997) Introduction, Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
11. Buisseret, T.J. & Cameron, H. (1994) Management of collaborative research: collaboration and exploitation under the UK's information engineering advanced technology programme, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 6, pp. 215-230.
12. Castells, M. (1996) The rise of the network society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Malden, MA: Blackwell).
13. Cavalla, D. & Gale, D. (1997) A case history of successful virtual research, Drug News & Perspectives: The International Drug Newsmagazine, 10, pp. 470-5.
14. Chiesa, V. (1996) Separating research from development: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry, European Management Journal, 14, pp. 638-47.
15. Cockburn, I.M. & Henderson, R.M. (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, pp. 157-82.
16. Cook-Deegan, R. (1995) The Gene Wars. Science Politics and the Human Genome (New York: Norton & Company).
17. Coriat, B. & Weinstein, O. (2002) Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation, Research Policy, 31, pp. 273-90.
18. Cramer, R.D., Patterson, D.E., Clark, R.D., Soltanstahi, F. & Lawless, M.S. (1998) Virtual compound libraries: a new approach to decision making in molecular discovery research, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 38, pp. 1010-23.
19. de Jong, H. & Rip, A. (1997) The computer revolution in science: steps towards the realization of computer-supported discovery environments, Artificial Intelligence, 91, pp. 225-6.
20. Enriquez, J. & Goldberg, R.A. (2000) Transforming life, transforming business: the life- science revolution, Harvard Business Review, pp. 96-104.
21. Faulkner, W., Senker, J. et al. (1995) Knowledge Frontiers. Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics, and Parallel Computing (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
22. Finholt, T.A. (2002) Collaboratories. In Shaw, D. (ed) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, p. 36 (Medford, NJ: Information Today).
23. Freeman, C. (1991) Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues, Research Policy, 20, pp. 499-514.
24. Gambardella, A. (1995) Science and Innovation. The US Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
25. Grabowski, H. & Vernon, J. (1994) Innovation and structural change in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, pp. 435-49.
26. Granstrand, O., Hakanson, L. & Sjolander, S. (1993) Internalization of R&D - a survey of some recent research, Research Policy, 22, pp. 413-30.
27. Hagen, J.B. (2001) The introduction of computers into systematic research in the United States during the 1960s, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science, 32, pp. 291-314.
28. Hansen, M.T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, pp. 82-111.
29. Hansen, M.T. (2002) Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies, Organization Science, 13, pp. 232-48.
30. Haour, G. (1998) The global village of innovation and R&D management - an introduction, R&D Management, 28, pp. 1-4.
31. Haussler, D. (2001) The challenge of bioinformatics, R&D Magazine, 43, 8S-SC3.
32. Heracleous, L. & Murray, J. (2001) The urge to merge in the pharmaceutical industry, European Management Journal, 19, pp. 430-7.
33. Hood, L. (2002) My Life and Adventures Integrating Biology and Technology. A Commemorative Lecture for the 2002 Kyoto Prize in Advanced Technologies 〈http://www.systemsbiology.org/extra/2002Kyoto.pdf.
34. Howard, K. (2000) The bioinformatics gold rush, Scientific American, July, pp. 58-63.
35. Howells, J. (2002) Mind the gap: information and communication technologies, knowledge activities and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry, Technology Analyis and Strategic Management, 14, pp. 355-701.
36. Jones, P.B.C. (2000) The commercialization of bioinformatics, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 3, p. 20.
37. Kay, L.E. (2000) Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
38. Kenney, M. (1986) Schumpetrian innovation and entrepreneurs in capitalism: a case study of the US biotechnology industry, Research Policy, 15, pp. 21-31.
39. King, R.D., Whelan, K.E., Jones, F.M., Reiser, P.G., Bryant, C.H., Muggleton, S.H., Kell, D.B. & Oliver, S.G. (2004) Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist, Nature, 427, pp. 247-52.
40. Kling, R. & McKim, G. (2000) Not just a matter of time: field differences in the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, pp. 1306-20.
41. Krieger, J.H. (1996) Genomic information, web technology drive chemical software development, Chemical and Engineering News, 17, pp. 10-17.
42. Krück, C.P. (1995) EUREKA: the construction of international R&D cooperation. In Thorn, Christopher (ed) Benevolent Conspiracies. The role of Enabling Technologies in the Welfare of Nations. The Cases of SDI, SEMATECH and EUREKA, pp. 175-324. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
43. Lenoir, T. (1999) Shaping biomedicine as an information science. Proceedings of the 1998 on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems. In Bowden, M.E., Bellardo Hahn, T. & William, R.V. (eds) ASIS Monograph Series (Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc.).
44. Lewis, R. (1998) Membership and management of a 'virtual' team: the perspectives of a research manager, R&D Management, 28, pp. 5-12.
45. Mackenzie, A. (2003) Bringing sequences to life, New Genetics and Society, 22(3), pp. 315-8.
46. McKusick, V. (1991) Current trends in mapping human genes, FASEB Journal, 5, p. 19.
47. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C. & Miles, G. (2000) The future.org., Long Range Planning, 33, pp. 300-21.
48. Morris, N. (2000) Vial bodies: conflicting interests in the move to new institutionalrelationships in biological medicines research and regulation, Research Policy, 29(2), pp. 149-67.
49. Munari, F., Roberts, E.B. & Sobrero, M. (2002) Privatization processes and the redefinition of corporate R&D boundaries, Research Policy, 31(1), pp. 31-53.
50. National Research Council (1997) Bits of Power. Issues in Access to Scientific Data (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
51. OECD (1999a) Global Research Village (Paris: OECD).
52. OECD (1999b) Globalisation of Industrial R&D: Policy Issues (Paris: OECD).
53. Olson, G., Finholt, T. et al. (2000) Behavioral Aspects of Collaboratories, pp. 1-14 (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
54. Orsenigo, L., Pammoli, F. & Massimo, R. (2001) Technological change and network dynamics: lessons from the pharmaceutical industry, Research Policy, 30(3), pp. 485-508.
55. Pickering, J.M. & King, J.L. (1999) Hardwiring weak ties. Interorganizational computer-mediated communication, occupational communities, and organizational change. In Fulk, J. (ed) Shaping Organization Form. Communication, Connection, and Community, pp. 399-413 (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
56. Powell, W.W. (1998) Learning from collaboration: knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, California Management Review, 40, pp. 228-40.
57. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp. 116-45.
58. Reed, J. (2000) Trends in Commercial Biotechnology (New York: Oscar Gruss).
59. Shan, W., Walker, G. & Kogut, B. (1994) Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 387-94.
60. Staropoli, C. (1998) Cooperation in R&D in the pharmaceutical industry - the network as an organizational innovation governing technological innovation, Technovation, 18, pp. 13-23.
61. Thayer, A.M. (2000) Bioinformatics for the masses, Chemical and Engineering News, 78, pp. 19-32.
62. Thomke, S. & Kuemmerle, W. (2002) Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: evidence form pharmaceutical drug discovery, Strategic Management Journal, 23(7), pp. 619-35.
63. Tushman, M.L. (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, pp. 587-604.
64. Van Lente, H. & Rip, A. (1998) The rise of membrane technology. From rhetorics to social reality, Social Studies of Science, 28, pp. 221-54.
65. Walsh, J.P. & Bayma, T. (1996) Computer networks and scientific work, Social Studies of Science, 26(3), pp. 661-703.
66. Webster, F. (1995) Theories of the Information Society (London: Routledge Kegan Paul).
67. Wilson, E.K. (2000) Chemists turned visionaries, Chemical and Engineering News, 78, pp. 39-45.
68. Woolgar, S. (2002) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
69. Wouters, P., Beaulieu, A. & Woo Park, H. (2002a) Knowledge production in the new digital networks. Network Research and Digital Information (Nerdi) NIWI-KNAW 〈http://www.niwi.knaw.nl/en/nerdi2/research_programme/toon
70. Wouters, P., Beaulieu, A. & Reddy, C. (2002b) Networks and databases: tools for the greater good? 26th Annual Meeting of 4S. Milwaukee, USA.
71. Wouters, P. & Schröder, P. (2000) Access to publicly financed research: the global research village III. [Amsterdam: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (Min. OCW). NIWI-KNAW].
72. Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Brewer, M.B. & Peng, Y. (1996) Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology. In Tyler, T.R. (ed) Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 90-113 (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
73. Zytkow, J.M., Zhu, J. & Hussam, A. (1990) Automated Discovery in a Chemistry Laboratory. 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-1990) (Cambridge, MA: MIT).