Personality, faking, and convergent validity: A warning concerning warning statements

Human Performance

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-106

  Robson, Sean M ^a   Jones, Andrew ^b   Abraham, Joseph ^c  

^a RADFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c A and M Psychometrics LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149117685     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08959280701522155     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abraham, J. D., & Morrison, J. D., Jr. (2002). Performance Perspectives Inventory: PPI technical manual, version b1.3. Tulsa, OK: A & M Psychometrics, LLC. Available from http://www.ppicentraI.com.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-24.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261-272.
5. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 715-722.
6. Block, J. (1965). The challenge of response sets: Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence, and social desirability in the MMPI. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
7. Brent, D. B., & Ellingson, J. E. (2002). Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 211-219.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Dwight, S. A., & Donovan, J. J. (2003). Do warnings not to fake reduce faking? Human Performance, 16, 1-23.
10. Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Hough, L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155-166.
11. Ellingson, J. E., Smith, D. B., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 122-133.
12. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.
13. Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 656-672.
14. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
15. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
16. Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Gregory, S. (1992). Validation of a sales representative selection inventory. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 161-171.
17. Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Murtha, T. (1992). Validation of a personality measure of managerial performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 225-237.
18. Hogan, J., Rybicki, S. L., Motowidlo, S. J., & Borman, W. C. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 11, 189-207.
19. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan Personality Inventory manual (2nd ed.). Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
20. Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 5, 469-411.
21. Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209-244.
22. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
23. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
24. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
25. Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 245-258.
26. Kluger, A. N., & Colella, A. (1993). Beyond the mean bias: The effect of warning against faking on biodata item variances. Personnel Psychology, 46, 763-780.
27. LaHuis, D. M., Martin, N. R., & Avis, J. M. (2005). Investigating nonlinear conscientiousness-job performance relations for clerical employees. Human Performance, 18(3), 199-212.
28. Landy, F. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1183-1192.
29. Lautenschlager, G. J. (1994). Accuracy and faking of background data. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Eds.), The biodata handbook: Theory, research, and applications. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 391-419.
30. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
31. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
32. McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across non-cognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
33. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46.
34. Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012-1027.
35. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
36. Morrison, J. D., Abraham, J. D., & Dennis, G. B. (2004). Relationship between the performance perspectives inventory's leadership scales and job performance of quick service restaurant managers. Applied H.R.M. Research, 9(1), 31-34.
37. Mueller-Hanson, R., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton III, G. C. (2003). Faking and selection: Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 348-355.
38. Nicholson, R. A., & Hogan, R. (1990). The construct validity of social desirability. American Psychologist, 45, 290-292.
39. Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Lado, M. (2003). Evidence of cross-cultural invariance of the Big Five personality dimensions in work settings. European Journal of Personality, 17, 67-76.
40. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's Unipolar Big-Five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
41. Schmitt, N., Clause, C. S., & Pulakos, E. D. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job relevant constructs. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 115-139). New York: Wiley.
42. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
43. Skyrme, P., Wilkinson, L., Abraham, J. D., & Morrison, J. D. (2005). Using personality to predict outbound call center job performance. Applied H.R.M. Research, 10(2), 89-98.
44. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961, May). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory.
45. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analysis of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197-210.