Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 197-210

  Viswesvaran, Chockalingam ^a   Ones, Deniz S ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033243619     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131649921969802     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. * Abrahams, N. M., Neumann, I., & Githens, W. H. (1971). Faking vocational interests: Simulated versus real life motivation. Personnel Psychology, 24, 5-12.
2. * Anderson, H. N., Sison, G., & Westner, S. (1984). Intelligence and dissimulation on the Personal Orientation Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1394-1398.
3. * Anthony, N. (1971). Comparison of clients' standard, exaggerated, and matching MMPI profiles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 100-103.
4. * Austin, J. S. (1992). The detection of fake good and fake bad on the MMPI-2. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 669-674.
5. * Bagby, R. M., Gillis, J. R., Toner, B. B., & Goldberg, J. (1991). Detecting fake-good and fake-bad responding on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II. Psychological Assessment, 3, 496-498.
6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
7. * Branca, A. A., & Podolnick, E. E. (1961). Normal, hypnotically induced, and feigned anxiety as reflected in and detected by the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 165-170.
8. * Braun, J. R. (1963). Effects of positive and negative faking sets on the survey of interpersonal values. Psychological Reports, 13, 171-173.
9. * Braun, J. R., & Dube, C. S. II. (1963). Note on a faking study with a famous sayings test. Psychological Reports, 13, 878.
10. * Braun, J. R., & Farrell, R. M. (1974). Re-examination of the fakability of the Gordon Personal Inventory and Profile: A reply to Schwab. Psychological Reports, 34, 247-250.
11. * Braun, J. R., & Gomez, B. J. (1966). Effects of faking instructions on the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 19, 388-390.
12. * Braun, J. R., & LaFaro, D. (1968). Fakability of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, Form C. Journal of Psychology, 68, 3-7.
13. * Braun, J. R., & Smith, M. (1973). Fakability of the self-perception inventory: Further investigation. Psychological Reports, 32, 586.
14. * Braun, J. R., & Tinley, J. J. (1972). Fakability of the Edwards Personality Inventory Booklets IA, II, and III. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 375-377.
15. * Cassisis, J. E., & Workman, D. E. (1992). The detection of malingering and deception with a short form of the MMPI-2 based on the L, F, and K scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 54-58.
16. Cattell, R. B. (1973). Personality and Mood Questionnaire. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G., & Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847-860.
18. * Comrey, A. L., & Backer, T. E. (1975). Detection of faking on the Comrey personality scales. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 311-319.
19. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Cowles, M., Darling, M., & Skanes, A. (1992). Some characteristics of the simulated self. Personality & Individual Differences, 13, 501-510.
21. * Craig, R. J., Kuncel, R., & Olson, R. E. (1994). Ability of drug abusers to avoid detection of substance abuse on the MCMI-II. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 95-106.
22. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
23. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: John Wiley.
24. * Dannenbaum, S. E., & Lanyon, R. I. (1993). The use of subtle items in detecting deception. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 501-510.
25. Douglas, E. F., McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. F. (1996). The validity of non-cognitive measures decays when applicants fake. In J. B. Keyes & L. N. Dosier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Management (pp. 127-131). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
26. * Dunnett, S., Koun, S., & Barber, P. J. (1981). Social desirability in the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 19-26.
27. * Exner, J. E., Jr., McDowell, E., Pabst, J., Stackman, W., & Kirk, L. (1963). On the detection of willful falsifications in the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 91-94.
28. Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability & dissimulation. Personality & Individual Differences, 7, 385-400.
29. * Gayton, W. E., Ozmon, K. L., & Wilson, W. T. (1973). Effects of faking instructions on the Psychological Screening Inventory. Psychological Reports, 32, 516-518.
30. * Gillis, J. R., Rogers, R., & Dickens, S. E. (1990). The detection of faking bad response styles on the MMPI. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 408-416.
31. * Gough, H. G. (1947). Simulated patterns on the MMPI. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 215-225.
32. * Graham, J. R., Watts, D., & Timbrook, R. E. (1991). Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 264-277.
33. * Grayson, H. M., & Olinger, L. B. (1957). Simulation of "normalcy" by psychiatric patients on the MMPI. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 73-77.
34. * Grow, R., & Mcvaugh, W., & Eno, T. D. (1980). Faking and the MMPI. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 910-917.
35. * Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Jr., Lehman, R.A.W., & Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects of faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 892-900.
36. * Hiscock, C. K., Rustemier, P. J., & Hiscock, M. (1993). Determination of criminal responsibility. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 391-405.
37. * Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validity of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
38. Hough, L. M., & Schneider, R. J. (1996). The frontiers of I/O Personality Research. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences & behavior in organizations (pp. 31-88). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. * Hsu, L. M., Santelli, J., & Hsu, J. R. (1989). Faking detection validity and incremental validity of the response latencies to MMPI subtle and obvious items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 278-295.
40. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. * Jeske, J. O., & Whitten, M. R. (1975). Motivational distortion of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire by persons in job applicants' roles. Psychological Reports, 37, 379-382.
42. * Kelly, D. B., & Greene, R. L. (1989). Detection of faking good on the MMPI in a psychiatric inpatient population. Psychological Reports, 65, 747-750.
43. * Knapp, R. R., Cardenas, C., & Michael, W. B. (1978). Cross-cultural validation of the effects of dissimulation on a measure of actualizing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 1157-1163.
44. * Lanyon, R. I. (1993). Development of scales to assess specific deception strategies on the Psychological Screening Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 5, 324-329.
45. * Match, J., & Wiggins, N. (1974). Individual viewpoints of social desirability related to faking good and desirability estimation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 591-606.
46. * McCaffrey, R. J., & Bellamy-Campbell, R. (1989). Psychometric detection of fabricated symptoms of combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic replication. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 76-79.
47. Meehl, P., & Hathaway, S. (1946). The K Factor as a suppressor in the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525-564.
48. Merydith, S. P., & Wallbrown, F. H. (1991). Reconsidering response sets, test-taking attitudes, dissimulation, self-deception, & social desirability. Psychological Reports, 69, 891-905.
49. * Morris, J. H., Wotruba, T. R., & Settle, R. B. (1977). Influence of respondent sets on two objective measures of achievement motivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 1051-1055.
50. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. * O'Mahony, P.D., & Murphy, P.G. (1991). Role-taking ability and Cough's theory of psychopathy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 107-118.
52. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct of integrity tests. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 3515.
53. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679.
54. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
55. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
56. * Perconte, S. T., & Goreczny, A. J. (1990). Failure to detect fabricated posttraumatic stress disorder with the use of MMPI in a clinical population. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1057-1060.
57. » Peterson, G. W., Clark, D. A., & Bennett, B. (1989). The utility of MMPI subtle, obvious, scales for detecting fake good and fake bad response sets. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 575-583.
58. * Posey, C. D., & Hess, A. K. (1984). The fakability of subtle and obvious measures of aggression of male prisoners. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 137-144.
59. * Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607-620.
60. * Schretlen, D., Wilkins, S. S., Van Gorp, W. G., & Bobholz, J. H. (1992). Cross-validation of a psychological test battery to detect faked insanity. Psychological Assessment, 4, 77-83.
61. * Schwab, D. P. (1971). Issues in response distortion studies of personality inventories: A critique and replicated study. Personnel Psychology, 24, 637-647.
62. Schwab, D. P. (1974). Comments of *Re-examination of the fakability of the Gordon Personal Inventory & Profile: A reply to Schwab.* Psychological Reports, 34, 316-318.
63. * Snyter, C. M., & Allik, J. P. (1981). The fakability of the Personal Orientation Dimensions: Evidence for a lie profile. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 533-538.
64. * Star, K. H. (1962). Ideal-self response set and Maudsley Personality Inventory Scores. Psychological Reports, 11, 708.
65. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
66. * Timbrook, R. E., Graham, J. R., Keiller, S. W., & Watts, D. (1993). Comparison of the Wiener-Harmon subtle-obvious scales and the standard validity scales in detecting valid and invalid MMPI-2 profiles. Psychological Assessment, 5, 53-61.
67. * Velicer, W. F., & Weiner, B. J. (1975). Effects of sophistication and faking sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 37, 71-73.
68. * Wetter, M. W., Baer, R. A., Berry, D.T.R., Robison, L. H., & Sumpter, J. (1993). MMPI-2 profiles of motivated fakers given specific symptom information: A comparison to matched patients. Psychological Assessment, 5, 317-323.
69. Windle, C. (1954). Test-retest effect on personality questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 617-633.
70. * Worthington, D. L., & Schlottmann, R. S. (1986). The predictive validity of subtle and obvious empirically derived psychological test items under faking conditions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 171-181.
71. * Woychyshyn, C. A., McElheran, W. G., & Romney, D. M. (1992). MMPI validity measures: A comparative study of original with alternative indices. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 138-148.
72. * Zalinski, J. S., & Abrahams, N. M. (1979). The effects of item context in faking personnel selection inventories. Personnel Psychology, 32, 161-166.
73. Zickar, M. J. (1997, April). Computer simulation offaking on a personality test. Poster presented at the 12th annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists, St. Louis, Missouri.
74. Zickar, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Detecting faking on a personality instrument using appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 71-87.
75. Zickar, M. J., Rosse, J., & Levin, R. (1996, April). Modeling the effects offaking on personality scales. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists, San Diego, California.