Ideomotor action in cooperative and competitive settings

Social Neuroscience

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 26-36

  Häberle, Anne ^a   Schütz Bosbach, Simone ^a,b   Laboissière, Rafael ^b   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b Universieté Claude Bernard Lyon I ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPETITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 39049146181     PISSN: 17470919     EISSN: 17470927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470910701482205     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Blakemore, S. -J. and Frith, C. (2005) The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43, pp. 260-267.
2. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Gallese, V. (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, pp. 400-404.
3. Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G. R., Zilles, K. and Freund, H. -J. (2004) Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42, pp. 323-334.
4. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E. and Haggard, P. (2005) Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15:8, pp. 1243-1249.
5. Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E. and Haggard, P. (2006) Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16, pp. 1905-1910.
6. Carpenter, W. B. Principles of mental physiology, Henry S. King, London
7. Casile, A. and Giese, M. A. (2006) Non-visual motor learning influences the recognition of biological motion. Current Biology, 16, pp. 69-74.
8. Chevreul, M. E. Lettre à M. Ampère sur une classe particulière de mouvements musculaires. Revue des Deux Mondes, pp. 258-266.
9. de Maeght, S. (2001) New insights in ideomotor action: Investigating the influence of perception, motor, and intention representations, University of Munich, Germany
10. de Maeght, S. and Prinz, W. (2004) Action induction through action observation. Psychological Research, 68:2, pp. 97-114.
11. Decety, J. and Grèzes, J. (2006) The power of simulation: Imaging one's own and other's behavior. Brain Research, 1079, pp. 4-14.
12. Decety, J. and Jackson, P. L. (2006) A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15:2, pp. 54-58.
13. Gallese, V. (2005) Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 23-48.
14. Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998) Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, pp. 493-501.
15. Gallese, V., Keysers, C. and Rizzolatti, G. (2004) A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 396-403.
16. Graf, M. (2007) Motor representations in the perception of actions and objects
17. Grush, R. (2004) The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, pp. 377-442.
18. Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G. and Mazziotta, J. C. (2005) Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3:3, pp. 529-535.
19. James, W. The principles of psychology, Holt, New York
20. Jeannerod, M. (2001) Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, pp. S103-S109.
21. Knoblich, G. and Sebanz, N. (2006) The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 15:3, pp. 99-104.
22. Knuf, L. (1998) Ideomotorische Phänomene. Neue Fakten für ein altes Problem. Entwicklung eines Paradigmas zur kinematischen Analyse induzierter Mitbewegungen [Ideomotor phenomena: New facts about an old problem. Developing a paradigm for the kinematic analysis, Shaker, Aachen, Germany
23. Knuf, L., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2001) An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130:4, pp. 779-798.
24. Lotze, R. H. Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele, Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung, Leipzig, Germany
25. Prinz, W. (1987) Ideomotor action. Perspectives on perception and action, pp. 47-76. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
26. Prinz, W. (2006) What re-enactment earns us. Cortex, 42, pp. 515-517.
27. Prinz, W., de Maeght, S. and Knuf, L. (2005) Intention in action. Attention in action: Advances from cognitive neuroscience, pp. 93-107. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
28. Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, pp. 169-192.
29. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. and Gallese, V. (2001) Neurophysiological mechanism underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, pp. 661-670.
30. Thorndike, E. L. (1913) Ideo-motor action. Psychological Review, 20, pp. 91-106.
31. Wilson, M. (2001) Perceiving imitable stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127, pp. 543-553.
32. Wilson, M. (2005) Covert imitation: How the body schema acts as a prediction device. Perception of the human body from the inside out, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
33. Wilson, M. and Knoblich, G. (2005) The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, pp. 460-473.
34. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K. and Kawato, M. (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, pp. 593-602.
35. Wolpert, D. M. and Flanagan, J. R. (2001) Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, pp. R729-R732.