What re-enactment earns us

Cortex

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 515-517

  Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action anticipation; Action uderstanding; Imitation; Mirror neurons; Re enactment

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; HUMAN; IMITATION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PREMOTOR CORTEX; ANIMAL; BRAIN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; HUMANS; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33747457028     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70389-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Carpenter WB. Principles of Mental Physiology. New York: Appleton, 1874/ 1984.
2. Chaminade T, Méary D, Orliaguet JP and Decety J. Is perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study. NeuroReport, 17: 3669-3674, 2001.
3. Chevreul ME. Lettre à M. Ampére sur une classe particuliére de mouvements musculaires. Revue des Deux Mondes, 2: 258-266, 1833.
4. De Maeght S and Prinz W. Action induction through action observation. Psychological Research, 68: 97-114, 2004.
5. Desmurget M and Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 423-431, 2000.
6. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L and Rizzolatti G. Action representation and the inferior parietal lobule. In Prinz W and Hommel B (Eds), Attention and Performance XIX: Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
7. Goldman AI. Simulation theory and mental concepts. In Dokic J and Proust J (Eds), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.
8. Grush R. In defence of some "Cartesian" assumptions concerning the brain and its operation. Biology and Philosophy, 18: 53-93, 2003.
9. Hesslow G. Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6: 242-247, 2002.
10. James W. The Principles of Psychology (vol. I-II). New York: Holt, 1890.
11. Jordan MI and Wolpert DM. Computational motor control. In Gazzaniga MS (Ed), The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
12. Knuf L, Aschersleben G and Prinz W. An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130: 779-798, 2001.
13. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74: 431-461, 1967.
14. Prinz W. Ideomotor action. In Heuer H and Sanders AF (Eds), Perspectives on Perception and Action. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1987.
15. Prinz W, De Maight S and Knuf L. Intention in action. In Humphreys GW and Riddoch JM (Eds), Attention in Action. Hove: Psychology Press, 2005.
16. Rizzolatti G. Understanding the action of others. In Kanwisher N and Duncan J (Eds), Attention and Performance XX: Functional Neuroimaging of Visual Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
17. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L and Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2: 661-670, 2001.
18. Schubotz RI and von Cramon DY. Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals different regions activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed. Cognitive Brain Research, 11: 97-112, 2001.
19. Schubotz RI and von Cramon DY. Predicting perceptual events activates corresponding motor schemes in lateral premotor cortex: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 15: 787-796, 2002.
20. Smith A. The theory of moral sentiments. In Raphael DD and Macfie AL (Eds), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondences of Adam Smith (vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press 1759/1976.
21. Ueberwasser F. Anweisungen zum Regelmäßigen Studium der Empirischen Psychologie für die Candidaten der Philosophie zu Münster. Münster: Theißing, 1787.
22. Verfaillie K and Daems A. Representing and anticipating human actions in vision. Visual Cognition, 9: 217-232, 2002.
23. Wilson M. Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127: 543-553, 2001.
24. Wilson M. Covert imitation: How the body schema acts as a prediction device. In Knoblich G, Thornton I, Grosjean M and Shiffrar M (Eds), Perception of the Human Body from the Inside Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
25. Wolpert DM and Flanagan JR. Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11: R729-R732, 2001.
26. Wolpert DM and Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11: 1317-1329, 1998.