The challenges of neuroethics

Functional Neurology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 235-242

  Reichlin, Massimo ^a,b  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Brain mind relationship; Enhancement; Free will; Moral intuitions; Naturalisation of ethics; Neuroethlcs

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR; STEROID;

ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN DAMAGE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; DOPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EMOTION; EPISTEMOLOGY; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTELLIGENCE; MEMORY DISORDER; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MORALITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; PERSONALITY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SELF ESTEEM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SURVIVAL; THINKING; VIOLENCE;

ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MORALS; NEUROPHARMACOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCES; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL;

EID: 38949096356     PISSN: 03935264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Gazzaniga MS. The Ethical Brain. New York; Dana Press 2005
2. Green M, Wikler D. Brain Death and Personal Identity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1980;9:105-133
3. McMahan J. The Ethics of Killing. Problems at the Margins of Life. New York; Oxford University Press 2002
4. Glannon W ed Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science: Essential Readings in Neuroethics. New York: Dana Press 2007
5. Illes J ed Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy. Oxford; Oxford University Press 2005
6. Marcus SJ ed Neuroethics: Mapping the Field. New York; Dana Press 2004
7. Farah MJ. Neuroethics: the practical and the philo-so-ph-ic-al. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:34-40
8. McClure SM, Li J, Tomlin D, Cypert KS, Montague LM, Montague PR. Neural correlates ot behavioral preferences for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron 2004;44:379-387
9. Farewell LA, Smith SS. Using brain MERMER testing to detect concealed knowledge despite efforts to conceal. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2001;46:1-9
10. Phelps EA. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J Cogn Neurosci 2000;12:729-738
11. Farah MJ, Wolpe PR. Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience tech-no-logies and their ethical implications. Hastings Cent Rep 2004;34:35-45
12. Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan R et al. Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nat Rev Neurosci 2004;5:421-425
13. Knutson B, Wolkowitz OM, Cole SW et al. Selective alteration of personality and social behavior by serotonergic intervention. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:373-379
14. Tse WS, Bond AJ. Serotonergic intervention affects both social dominance and affiliative behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002;161:324-330
15. Kramer PD. Listening to Prozac. Harmondsworth; Penguin 1993
16. Wurtzel E. Prozac Nation: Young and Depressed in America. New York; Riverhead Books 1995
17. Elliot C, Chambers T. Prozac as a Way of Life. Chapel Hill; University of North Carolina Press 2004
18. Flower R. Lifestyle drugs: pharmacology and the social agenda. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004;25:182-185
19. Diller LH. The run on Ritalin: attention deficit disorder and stimulant treatment in the 1990s. Hastings Cent Rep 1996; 26:12-18
20. Rose SP. 'Smart drugs': do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal? Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:975-979
21. Hoag H. Neuroengineering: remote control. Nature 2003; 423:796-798
22. Elliott C. The tyranny of happiness: ethics and cosmetic psychopharmacology. In: Parens E ed Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications. Washington D.C.; Georgetown University Press 1998:177-188
23. Juengst ET. What does enhancement mean? In: Parens E ad Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications. Washington D.C.; Georgetown University Press 1998:27-47
24. DeGrazia D. Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 2005:203-243
25. Gazzaniga MS. The Mind's Past. Berkeley; University of California Press 1998
26. Dennett DC. Consciousness Explained. Boston; Little Brown & Co 1991
27. Metzinger T. Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 2004
28. Glannon W. Neurobiology, neuroimaging, and free will. In: French PA, Wettstein AK eds Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Oxford; Blackwell 2005;29:68-82
29. Roskies A. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends Cogn Sci 2006;10:419-423
30. Morris SG. Neuroscience and the free will conundrum. Am J Bioeth 2007;7:20-22
31. Churchland PM. Towards a cognitive neurobiology of the moral virtues. Topoi 1998;17:83-96
32. Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001;293:2105-2108
33. Greene J. From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuro-scientific moral psychology? Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:846-849
34. Greene J, Haidt J. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:517-523
35. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Ann Rev Neurosci 2004;27:169-192
36. Hauser M. Moral minds: how nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York; Ecco Press 2006
37. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 2007;446:908-911
38. Damasio AR. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York; Penguin 1994
39. Anderson SW, Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:1032-1037
40. Casebeer WD. Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:840-846
41. Damasio A. Neuroscience and ethics: intersections. Am J Bioeth 2007;7:3-7
42. Singer P. Ethics and intuitions. The Journal of Ethics 2005;9:331-352
43. Singer P. Practical Ethics. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 1993
44. Korsgaard C. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 1996
45. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 2001; 108:814-834
46. Daniels N. Justice and justification: reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 1996
47. Farah MJ, Heberlein AS. Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating? Am J Bioeth 2007;7:37-48