Neuroscience and ethics: Intersections

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-7

  Damasio, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BIOETHICS; BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASE; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; ETHICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; NEUROSCIENCE; ONSET AGE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOPATHY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; PUNISHMENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; REWARD; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SYNDROME;

AGE OF ONSET; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; BEHAVIOR; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; ETHICS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MORAL DEVELOPMENT; MORALS; NEUROSCIENCES; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; PUNISHMENT; REWARD; SOCIAL VALUES; SYNDROME;

EID: 33847044315     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160601063910     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Adolphs, R., H. Damasio, D. Tranel, G. Cooper, and A. R. Damasio. 2000. A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping. Journal of Neuroscience 20: 2683-2690.
2. Anderson. S. W., A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, and A. R. Damasio. 1999. Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2: 1032-1037.
3. Bechara, A., H. Damasio, D. Tranel, and A. R. Damasio. 1997. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275: 1293-1294.
4. Brosnan, S., and F. De Waal. 2003. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425: 297-299.
5. Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes' Error. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
6. Damasio, A. 1996. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Transactions of the Royal Society London 351: 1413-1420.
7. Damasio, A. 2003. Looking for Spinoza. New York, NY: Harcourt.
8. Damasio, H., T. Grabowski, R. Frank, A. M. Galaburda, and A. R. Damasio. 1994. The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science 264: 1102-1105.
9. De Martino, B., D. Kumaran, B. Seymour, and R. J. Dolan. 2006. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313: 684-687.
10. De Waal, F. Our inner ape. 2005. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
11. Greene, J. D., R. B. Sommerville, L. E. Nystrom, J. M. Darley, and J. D. Cohen. 2001. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293: 2105-2108.
12. Haidt, J. 2003. The moral emotions in R. J. Davidson, K. Scherer, and H. H. Goldsmith (eds.), Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press.
13. Hauser, D. M. 2000. Wild minds. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
14. Hume, D. 1961. A treatise of human nature: Enquiry concerning the principles of morals. New York, NY: Doubleday.
15. Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millennium. Neuron 35: 21-23.
16. Shweder, R. A., and J. Haidt. The cultural psychology of the emotions: Ancient andnew, inM. Lewis and J. Haviland (eds.), Handbook of emotions, 2nd Ed. New York: Guilford.
17. Singer, T., B. Seymour, J. O'Doherty,H. Kaube, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith. 2004. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303: 1157-1162.
18. Smith, A. 2002. A theory of moral sentiment. Cambridge, NK: Cambridge University Press.