Neuroscience and the free will conundrum

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 20-22

  Morris, Stephen G ^a  

^a MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HUMAN; NEUROSCIENCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; NEUROSCIENCES; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SECURITY MEASURES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34248589336     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701290298     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Canli, T., S. Brandon, W. Casebeer, P.J. Crowley, D. DuRousseau, H.T. Greely, and A. Pascual-Leone. 2007. Neuroethics and national security. American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 7(5): 3-13.
2. Gazzaniga, M.S., and M.S. Steven. 2005. Neuroscience and the law. Scientific American Mind Magazine April: 43-49.
3. Greene, J., and J. Cohen. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359:1775-1785.
4. Libet, B. 1985. Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 529-566.
5. Nahmias, E., S. Morris, T. Nadelhoffer, and J. Turner. 2005. Surveying freedom: Folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. Philosophical Psychology 18(5): 561-584.
6. Pinker, S. 2007. The mystery of consciousness. Time January 29:58-70.
7. Wegner, D. 2002. The illusion of conscious will, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.