Bystander signal production and response are independent processes which are cell line dependent

International Journal of Radiation Biology

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 83-90

  Vines, Alice M ^a   Lyng, Fiona M ^a   McClean, Brendan ^b   Seymour, Colin ^c   Mothersill, Carmel E ^c  

^a DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

^b ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bystander effect; Radiation; Response; Signal

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE 6 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BYSTANDER EFFECT; CELL LINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION; RADIATION RESPONSE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; BYSTANDER EFFECT; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHO CELLS; COBALT RADIOISOTOPES; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; GLUCOSEPHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RADIATION TOLERANCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS;

EID: 38849122628     PISSN: 09553002     EISSN: 13623095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09553000701797062     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Little JB. 2001. Direct evidence for the participation of gap-junction mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha-particle irradiated to non-irradiated cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:473-478.
2. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Spitz DR, Little JB. 2002. Oxidative metabolism modulates signal transduction and micronucleus formation in bystander cells from a particles-irradiated normal human fibroblast cultures. Cancer Research 62:5436-5442.
3. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Little JB. 2003. Oxidative metabolism, gap junctions and the ionising radiation-induced bystander effect. Oncogene 22:7050-7057.
4. Belyakov OV, Folkard M, Mothersill C, Prise KM, Michael BD. 2002. Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation. Radiation Protection. Dosimetry 99:249-251.
5. Belyakov OV, Folkard M, Mothersill C, Prise KM, Michael BD. 2006. Bystander induced differentiation: A major response to targeted irradiation of a urothelial explant model. Mutation Research 597:43-49.
6. Belyakov OV, Prise KM, Trott KR, Michael BD. 1999. Delayed lethality, apoptosis and micronucleus formation in human fibroblasts irradiated with X-rays or alpha-particles. International Journal of Radiation Biology 75:985-993.
7. Coates PJ, Lorimore SA, Wright EG. 2004. Damaging and protective cell signalling in the untargeted effects of ionising radiation. Mutation Research 568:5-20.
8. Hu B, Wu L, Han W, Zhang L, Chen S, Xu A, Hei TK, Yu Z. 2006. The time and spatial effects of bystander response in mammalian cells induced by low dose radiation. Carcinogenesis 27:245-251.
9. Iyer R, Lehnert BE. 2002. Low dose, low-LET ionizing radiation-induced radioadaptation and associated early responses in unirradiated cells. Mutation Research 503:1-9.
10. Kashino G, Prise KM, Schettino G, Folkard M, Vojnovic B, Michael BD, Suzuki K, Kodama S, Watanabe M. 2004. Evidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cells. Mutation Research 556:209-215.
11. Lehnert BE, Goodwin EH, Deshpande A. 1997. Extracellular factors following exposure to alpha particles can cause sister chromatid exchanges in normal human cells. Cancer Research 57:2164-2171.
12. Li WG, Miller FJ, Zang HJ Jr , Spitz DR, Oberley LW, Weintraub NL. 2001. Hydrogen peroxide-induced superoxide production by a non-phagocytic NADPH oxidase causes oxidant injury. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:29251-29256.
13. Little JB, Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Nagasawa H. 2002. Bystander effects: Intercellular transmission of radiation damage signals. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99:159-162.
14. Little JB. 2006. Cellular radiation effects and the bystander response. Mutation Research 597:113-118.
15. Lyng FM, Seymour CB, Mothersill C. 2000. Production of a signal by irradiated cells which leads to a response in unirradiated cells characteristic of initiation of apoptosis. British Journal of Cancer 83:1223-1230.
16. Lyng FM,Maguire P, Kilmurrary N, Mothersill C, Shao C, Folkard M, Prise K. 2006. Apoptosis is initiated in human keratinocytes exposed to signalling factors from microbeam irradiated cells. International Journal of Radiobiology 82:393-399.
17. Matsumoto H, Hayashi S, Hatashita M, Ohnishi K, Shioura H, Ohtsubo T, Kitai R, Ohnishi T, Kano E. 2001. Induction of radioresistance by nitric oxide mediated bystander effect. Radiation Research 155:387-396.
18. Morgan WF. 2003. Is there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other non-targeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 22:7094-7099.
19. Mothersill C, Seymour CB. 1998. Cell to cell contact during gamma radiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: Evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium. Radiation Research 149:256-262.
20. Mothersill C, Stamato TD, Perez ML, Cummins R, Mooney R, Seymour CB. 2000. Involvement of energy metabolism in the production of 'bystander effect' by radiation. British Journal of Cancer 82:1740-1746.
21. Mothersill C, Seymour RJ, Seymour CB. 2004. Bystander effects in repair-deficient cell lines. Radiation Research 161:256-263.
22. Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2006. Radiation induced bystander effects and the DNA paradigm: An 'out of field' perspective. Mutation Research 597:5-10.
23. Nagaswa H, Little JB. 1992. Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles. Cancer Research 52:6394-6396.
24. Narayanan PK, Goodwin EH, Lehnert BE. 1997. Alpha particles initiate biological production of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide in human cells. Cancer Research 57:3963-3971.
25. Pirisi L, Creek KE, Doniger J, DiPaolo JA. 1988. Continuous cell lines with altered and differentiation properties originate after transfection of human keratinocytes with human papillomavirus type 16 DNA. Carcinogenesis 9:1573-1579.
26. Prise KM, Belyakov OV, Folkard M, Michael BD. 1998. Studies of bystander effects in human fibroblasts using a charged particle microbeam. International Journal of Radiation Biology 74:793-798.
27. Prise KM, Folkard M, Michael BD. 2003. A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 104:347-355.
28. Prise KM, Folkard M, Michael BD. 2005. New insights on cell death from radiation exposure. Lancet Oncology 6:520-528.
29. Puck TT, Marcus PI. 1956. Action of X-rays on mammalian cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 653-666.
30. Schettino G, Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Held KD, Michael BD. 2003. Low dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X-rays. Radiation Research 160:505-511.
31. Seymour CB, Mothersill C. 2000. Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low dose region of the radiation dose response curve. Radiation Research 153:508-511.
32. Shao C, Furuasawa Y, Kobayashi Y, Funayama T, Wada S. 2003a. Bystander effect induced by counted high LET particles in confluent human fibroblasts: A mechanistic study. FASEB Journal 17:1422-1427.
33. Shao C, Stewart V, Folkard M, Michael BD, Prise KM. 2003b. Nitric oxide mediated signalling in the bystander response of individually targeted glioma cells. Cancer Research 63:8437-8442.
34. Stamato TD, Richardson E, Ianacone J, Maclaren RA, Denko N, Giaccia A. 1989. Isolation and characterization of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase- deficient Chinese hamster cells derived from pure mutatant colonies. Mutagenesis 44:259-264.
35. Yang H, Asaad N, Held KD. 2005. Medium-mediated intercellular communication is involved in bystander responses of X-ray-irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene 24:2096-2103.