Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: Two-year results

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-14

  Demirci, Mustafa ^a,b   Yildiz, Ezel ^a   Uysal, Ömer ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Biostatistics ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; FILTEK A110 COMPOSITE RESIN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 38549153940     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/07-34     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2001) Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry Operative Dentistry (Supplement 6) 119-144.
2. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges Operative Dentistry 28(3) 215-235.
3. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials Dental Materials 21(9) 864-881.
4. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G & Davidson CL (1999) Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots American Journal of Dentistry 12(5) 243-249.
5. Mason PN, Calabrese M & Graiff L (1998) Modified extrusion shear bond strength of the new 3M adhesive Journal of Dental Research 77(Special Issue) Abstract #256 p 1239.
6. Reusens B, D'hoore W & Vreven J (1999) In vivo comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid minifilled composite resin in Class III restorations: 2-year follow-up Clinical Oral Investigations 3(2) 62-69.
7. Filtek A110 Anterior Restorative, 3M Technical Product File, USA, 2000.
8. Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Medina VO III, Shirono M, Tanaka N & Katoh Y (2002) Effect of surface conditioning and restorative material on the shear bond strength and resin-dentin interface of a new one-bottle nanofilled adhesive Dental Materials 18(7) 535-542.
9. Luo Y, Tay FR, Lo ECM & Wei SHY (2000) Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods Journal of Dentistry 28(7) 495-500.
10. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G & Urlinger T (1998) Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions Clinical Oral Investigations 2(2) 58-66.
11. Berg JH (1998) The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry-a review for the clinician Journal of Pediatric Dentistry 20(2) 93-100.
12. Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM & Garcia-Godoy F (2006) Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results Journal of Dentistry 34(6) 381-388.
13. van Dijken JWV (1996) 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations American Journal of Dentistry 9(5) 195-198.
14. Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS & Ireland EJ (2004) Clinical evaluation of four Class V restorative materials: 3-year recall American Journal of Dentistry 17(3) 147-150.
15. Luo Y, Lo ECM, Fang DTS, Smales RJ & Wei SHY (2002) Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results American Journal of Dentistry 15(6) 403-406.
16. Ryge G (1980) Clinical criteria International Dental Journal 30(4) 347-358.
17. Perdigão J, Carmo AR & Geraldeli S (2005) Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 7(3) 253-258.
18. Efes BG, Dorter C, Gomec Y & Koray F (2006) Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 8(2) 119-126.
19. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE & Davidson JM (2005) Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials Operative Dentistry 30(3) 275-281.
20. Abdalla AI, Mahallawy SE & Davidson CL (2002) Clinical and SEM evaluations of three compomer systems in Class V carious lesions Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29(8) 714-719.
21. Ermis RB (2002) Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions Quintessence International 33(7) 542-548.
22. Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RCW & Peters TC (1998) Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results American Journal of Dentistry 11(3) 143-148.
23. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L & Montanari G (1998) Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: A 3-year retrospective study Clinical Oral Investigations 2(4) 168-173.
24. Turkun LS & Aktener BO (2001) Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials Journal of the American Dental Association 132(2) 196-203.
25. Tyas MJ & Burrow MF (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions American Journal of Dentistry 15(5) 309-311.
26. Sidhu SK, Ikeda T, Omata Y, Fujita M & Sano H (2006) Change of color and translucency by light curing in resin composites Operative Dentistry 31(5) 598-603.
27. Johnston WM & Reisbick MH (1997) Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative materials Dental Materials 13(2) 89-97.
28. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T & Takatsu T (1996) Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials Operative Dentistry 21(2) 73-80.
29. Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR, Cordeiro HJ, Dutra-Correa M & Castilhos N (2005) Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months American Journal of Dentistry 18(2) 135-140.
30. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Nilner K & Raping S (1994) Clinical performance of three anterior restorative materials over 10 years Quintessence International 25(2) 101-108.
31. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR & Ong JL (1996) Directly placed esthetic restorative materials-the continuum Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 17(8) 731-734.
32. van Dijken JW & Horstedt P (1987) Marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations placed with or without intermediate low-viscous resin. An SEM investigation Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 45(2) 115-123.
33. Tyas MJ (2000) Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) Operative Dentistry 25(3) 152-154.
34. Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L & Montanari G (1998) Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: A 3-year retrospective study Clinical Oral Investigations 2(4) 168-173.
35. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH & Hickel R (2001) Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials-3-year results Clinical Oral Investigations 5(1) 31-39.
36. Di Lenarda R, Caderano M & De Stefano Dorigo E (2000) Cervical compomer restorations: The role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation Operative Dentistry 25(5) 382-387.
37. Abate PF, Bertacchini SM, Polack MA & Macchi RL (1997) Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures Quintessence International 28(8) 509-512.