Socially appraising justice: A cross-cultural perspective

Social Justice Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-39

  Conner, Deondra S ^a  

^a ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural dimensions; Culture; Equity; Justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843124227     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022922010184     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), Academic Press, New York, pp. 267-299.
2. Austin, W. (1977). Equity theory and social processes. In: Suls, J. M., and Miller, R. M. (eds.), Social Comparison Processes, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, pp. 279-301.
3. Beugre, C. D. (1998). Managing Fairness in Organizations, Quorum, Westport, CT.
4. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In: Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 289-319.
5. Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.), Research On Negotiations in Organizations (Vol. 1), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43-55.
6. Blodgett, J. G., Tax, S. S., and Hill, D. J. (1997). The effects of distributive, procedural and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior. J. Retailing 73: 185-210.
7. Bond, M. H., and Forgas, J. P. (1984). Linking person perception to behavior intention across cultures: The role of cultural collectivism. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 15: 337-352.
8. Bond, M. H., Leung, K., and Wan, K. C. (1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward allocation. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 13: 186-200.
9. Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27(1): 58-76.
10. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., et al. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The moderating influence of power distance on reactions to voice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37(4): 300-315.
11. Brockner, J., and Adsit, L. (1986). The moderating impact of sex on the equity-satisfaction relationship: A field study. J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 585-590.
12. Brockner, J., Chen, Y., and Mannix, E. A. (2000). Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Adm. Sci. Q. 45(1): 138-159.
13. Brockner, J., and Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychol. Bull. 120(4): 189-208.
14. Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., and Hui, H. (1998). Deciding on equity or parity: A test of situational, cultural, and individual factors. J. Organ. Behav. 19(2): 115-129.
15. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86: 386-400.
16. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C., and Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(3): 425-445.
17. Cropanzano, R., and Kacmar, K. M. (1995). Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace, Quorum, Westport, CT.
18. Dakin, S., and Arrowood, A. J. (1981). The social comparison of ability. Hum. Relat. 34(2): 89-109.
19. Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22: 280-296.
20. Dawar, N., Parker, P. M., and Price, L. J. (1996). A cross-cultural study of interpersonal information exchange. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 27(3): 497-516.
21. Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Adm. Sci. Q. 34(4): 565-581.
22. Eckel, C. C., and Grossman, P. J. (1996). The relative price of fairness: Gender differences in a punishment game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 30(2): 143-158.
23. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7: 117-140.
24. Folger, R., and Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Empl. Responsibil. Rights J. 2: 79-90.
25. Folger, R., and Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage, London.
26. Ghobadian, A., and White, M. (1988). Personnel policies, structural characteristics, and equity in job-evaluated payment systems. Pers. Rev. 17(5): 29-32.
27. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 18(4): 694-734.
28. Gómez, C., Kirkman, B. L., and Shapiro, D. L. (2000). The impact of collectivism and ingroup/outgroup membership on evaluation generosity. Acad. Manage. J. 43(6): 1097-2007.
29. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad. Manage. Rev. 12: 9-22.
30. Hofstede, G. (1980a). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organ. Dyn. 42-63.
31. Hofstede, G. (1980b). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
32. Hofstede, G. (1999). Think locally, act globally: Cultural constraints in personnel management. Manage. Int. Rev. 38(2): 7-26.
33. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
34. Hui, C. H., Triandis, H. C., and Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 30: 145-157.
35. Kagitcibasi, C., and Berry, J. W. (1989). Cross-cultural psychology: Current research and trends. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 40: 493-531.
36. Kidder, L. H., and Muller, S. (1991). What is "fair" in Japan? In: Vermunt, R., and Steensma, H. (eds.), Social and Psychological Consequences of Justice and Injustice (Vol. 2), Plenum, New York, pp. 139-154.
37. Kim, K. I., Park, H., and Suzuki, N. (1990). Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Acad. Manage. J. 33(1): 188-198.
38. Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. J. Manage. 21(4): 657-669.
39. Korsgaard, M. A., and Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. J. Manage. 21(4): 657-669.
40. Kotabe, M., Dubinsky, A. J., and Chae, U. L. (1992). Perceptions of organizational fairness: A cross-national perspective. Int. Mark. Rev. 9(2): 41-58.
41. Leung, K., Au, Y. F., Fernandez-Dols, J. M., and Iwawaki, S. (1992). Preference for methods of conflict processing in two collectivist cultures. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 13.
42. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum, New York, pp. 27-55.
43. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., and Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In: Mikula, G. (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 167-218.
44. Lind, A., and Earley, C. (1992). Procedural justice and culture. Int. J. Psychol. 27(2): 227-242.
45. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum, New York.
46. Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., and Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73(4): 767-780.
47. Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In: Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 43-76.
48. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., and Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Manage. J. 43(4): 738-748.
49. McFarlin, D. B., and Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Acad. Manage. J. 35: 626-637.
50. Mejias, R. J., Shepherd, M. M., Vogel, D. R., and Lazaneo, L. (1997). Consensus and perceived satisfaction levels: A cross-cultural comparison of GSS and non-GSS outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 13(3): 137-161.
51. Mossholder, K. W., Kemery, E. R., and Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. J. Manage. 24(4): 533-552.
52. Pennings, J. (1993). Executive reward systems: A cross-national comparison. J. Manage. Stud. 30(2): 261-280.
53. Pfeffer, J. (1991). Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. J. Manage. 17(4): 789-803.
54. Schuler, R. S., and Rogovsky, N. (1998). Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 29(1): 159-177.
55. Telly, C. S., French, W. L., and Scott, W. G. (1971). The relationship of inequity to turnover among hourly workers. Adm. Sci. Q. 16(2): 164-172.
56. Thibaut, J. W., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
57. Tyler, T. R., and Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In: Carroll, J. (ed.), Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77-98.
58. Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., and Huo, Y. J., (2000). Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures. Psychol. Public Policy, & Law. 6(4): 1138-1163.
59. Vitell, S. J., Nwachukwu, S. L., and Barnes, J. H. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede's typology. J. Bus. Ethics 12(10): 753-760.
60. Williams, S. (1999). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on performance. J. Psychol. 133(2): 183-193.
61. Witt, L. A. (1995). Influences of supervisor behaviors. In: Cropanzano, R., and Kacmar, K. M. (eds.), Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace, Quorum, Westport, CT, pp. 37-53.