Attending to local form while ignoring global aspects depends on handedness: Evidence from TMS

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 276-277

  Mevorach, Carmel ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Shalev, Lilach ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; HANDEDNESS; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEFT HANDEDNESS; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 14544304520     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn1400     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Navon, D. Cog. Psych. 9, 353-383 (1977).
2. Fink, G. et al. Nature 382, 626-628 (1996).
3. Delis, D.C., Robertson, L.C. & Efron, R. Neuropsychologia 24, 205-214 (1986).
4. Robertson, L.C., Lamb, M. & Knight, R. J. Neurosci. 8, 3757-3769 (1988).
5. Marshall, J.C. & Halligan, P.W. Nature 373, 521-523 (1995).
6. Knecht, S. et al. Brain 123, 2512-2518 (2000).
7. Laeng, B. & Peters, M. Neuropsychologia 33, 421-439 (1995).
8. Pascual-Leone, A., Walsh, V. & Rothwell, J. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 232-237 (2000).
9. Fink, G. et al. Brain 120, 1779-1791 (1997).
10. Shalev, L., Humphreys, G.W. & Mevorach, C. Cogn. Neuro. (in the press).
11. Chen, R. et al. Neurology 46, 1398-1403 (1997).
12. Hilgetag, C.C., Theorat, H. & Pascual-Leone, A. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 953-957 (2001).