A web-based curriculum-based measurement system for class-wide ongoing assessment: Original article

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 47-60

  Tsuei, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TAIPEI   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Class wide assessment; Curriculum based measurement; Internet; Mathematics; Web based technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149139259     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00242.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aleven V.A.W.M.M. Koedinger K.R. (2002) An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science 26, 147 179.
2. Anderson J.R., Boyle C.F. Reiser B.J. (1985) Intelligent tutoring systems. Science 228, 456 462.
3. Buchana T. (2000) The efficacy of a world-wide web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 16, 193 200.
4. Conole G. Warburton B. (2005) A review of computer-assisted assessment. ALT-Journal of Research in Learning Technology 13, 17 31.
5. Deno S.L. (1985) Curriculum-based measurement: the emerging alternative. Exceptional Children 52, 219 232.
6. Deno S.L., Fuchs L.S., Marston D. Shin J. (2001) Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review 30, 507 524.
7. Espin C.A., Shin J. Busch T.W. (2005) Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: vocabulary matching as an indicator of progress in social studies learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities 38, 353 363.
8. Fuchs L.S. Deno S.L. (1991) Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally revelantrelevant measurement models. Exceptional Children 57, 488 500.
9. Fuchs L.S. Fuchs D. (1997) Use of curriculum-based measurement in identifying students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children 30, 1 14.
10. Fuchs L.S. Fuchs D. (2002) Curriculum-based measurement: describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treat nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education 77, 64 84.
11. Fuchs L.S., Deno S.L. Mirkin P.K. (1984) Effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal 21, 449 460.
12. Fuchs L.S., Hamlett C.L., Fuchs D., Stecker P.M. Ferguson C. (1988) Conducting curriculum-based measurement with computerized data collection: effects on efficiency and teacher satisfaction. Journal of Special Education Technology 11, 73 86.
13. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L. Allinder R.M. (1989) The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique 14, 203 221.
14. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L. Stecker M.P. (1991) Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal 28, 617 641.
15. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L. Ferguson C. (1992) Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children 21, 436 450.
16. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L., Walz L. Genmann G. (1993) Formative evaluation of academic progress: how much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review 22, 27 48.
17. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hamlett C.L., Thompson A., Roberts P.H., Kupek P. Stecker P.M. (1994) Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Diagnostique 19, 24 49.
18. Fuchs L.S., Hamlett C.L. Fuchs D. (1998) Monitoring Basic Skills Progress. Pro-ED, Austin, TX.
19. Gerber M.M., Semmel D.S. Semmel M.I. (1994) Computer-based dynamic assessment of multidigit multiplication. Exceptional Children 61, 114 125.
20. Gettinger M. Stoiber K.C. (1998) Excellence in teaching: review of instructional and environmental variables. In The Handbook of School Psychology (eds C.R. Reynolds T.B. Gutkin), pp. 933 958. Wiley, New York, NY.
21. Green S.L. Shinn M.R. (1990) Curriculum-based measurement: facilitating dynamic, outcomes-based consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 1, 321 341.
22. He Q. Tymms P. (2005) A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21, 419 429.
23. Helwig R., Anderson L. Tindal G. (2002) Using concept-grounded, curriculum-based measure in mathematics to predict statewide test scores for middle school students with LD. Journal of Special Education 36, 102 112.
24. Howard P.H. (1999) Growth curve analysis of curriculum-based measurements: analyzing normative data in reading for first through fifth-grade students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of South Florida.
25. Huitema B.E. (1980) The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, NY.
26. Jessor R. (1993) Successful adolescent development among youth in high-risk settings. American Psychologist 48, 117 126.
27. Jones E.D. Krous J.P. (1988) The effectiveness of data-based instruction by student teachers in classrooms for pupils with mild learning handicaps. Teacher Education and Special Education 11, 9 19.
28. Legg S.M. Buhr D.C. (1992) Computerized adaptive testing with different groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11, 23 27.
29. Ma X. (2001) Participation in advanced mathematics: do expectation and influence of students, peers, teachers, and parents matter? Contemporary Educational Psychology 26, 132 146.
30. Monson R. Judd K. (2001) CalMath: an interactive learning system focusing on the diagnosis of mathematical misconceptions. Journal of Computers and Science Teaching 20, 19 43.
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Author, Reston, VA.
32. Nguyen D.M., Hsieh Y.J. Allen G.D. (2006) The impact of web-based assessment and practice on students' mathematics learning attitudes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 25, 251 279.
33. Reschly D. (1988) Special education reform: school psychology revolution. School Psychology Review 17, 459 475.
34. Salvia J. Ysseldyke J.E. (1991) Assessment, 5th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
35. Shinn M.R., ed. (1998) Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement. The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
36. Slaughter-Defoe D.T. (1995) Revisiting the concept of socialization: caregiving and teaching in the 90s: a personal perspective. American Psychologist 50, 270 286.
37. Spicuzza R., Ysseldyke J., Lemkuil A., Kosciolek S., Boys C. Teelucksingh E. (2001) Effects of curriculum-based monitoring on classroom instruction and math achievement. Journal of School Psychology 39, 521 542.
38. Stecker P.M. Fuchs L.S. (2000) Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: the importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 15, 128 134.
39. Thurber R.S., Shinn M.R. Smolkowski K. (2002) What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review 31, 498 513.
40. Tsuei M. (2001) A study of computerized mathematics CBM system for the assessment of students with learning disabilities: development, reliability and validity. Journal of Taipei Municipal Teachers College 33, 281 308.
41. Tsuei M. (2004) A study of the application of web-based ECBM system on mathematics achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Taipei Municipal Teachers College 35, 43 57.
42. Wesson C.L. (1991) Curriculum based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation. Exceptional Children 57, 246 257.
43. Woodward J. Cuban L., eds 2001) Technology, Curriculum and Professional Development. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.