An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 17-31

  Kerlind, Gerlese S ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149056671     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070701794775     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Åkerlind, G.S. 2004. A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education 9: 363-76.
2. _. 2005a. Variation and commonality in the phenomenographic research, methods, Higher Education Research and Development 24: 321-34.
3. _. 2005b. Ways of experiencing being a university researcher. In Bowden and Green 2005, 145-55.
4. Biggs, J.B., and. K.F. Collis. 1982. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
5. Bills, D. 2004. Supervisors' conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development. International Journal for Academic Development 9: 85-97.
6. Bowden, J., and P. Green, eds. 2005. Doing developmental phenomenography, 145-55. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
7. Bowden, J., P. Green, R. Barnacle, N. Cherry, and R. Usher. 2005. Academics' ways of understanding success in research activities, in Bowden and Green 2005, 128-144.
8. Brew, A. 2001. Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education 26: 271-85.
9. Bruce, C., B. Pham, and I. Stoodley. 2004. Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals, Studies in Higher Education 29: 219-38.
10. Department of Education, Science and. Training. 2005. Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. Final advice on the preferred RQF model. Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/ key_issues/ research_quality_framework/final_advice_on_preferred_rqf_niodel. htni.
11. Ingerman, Å., and S. Booth. 2003. Expounding on physics: A phenomenographic study of physicists talking of their physics. International Journal of Science Education 25: 1489-508.
12. Kember, D. 1997. A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching, Learning and Instruction 7: 255-75.
13. Kiley, M., and G. Mullins. 2005. Supervisors' conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49: 245-62.
14. Marlon, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Meyer, J.H.F., M.P. Shanahan, and R.C. Laugksch. 2005. Students' conceptions of research: I - A qualitative and quantitative analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49: 225-44.
16. Neumann, R. 1993. Research and scholarship: Perceptions of senior academic administrators, Higher Education 25: 97-110.
17. Pham, B., C. Bruce, and I. Stoodley. 2005. Constituting information technology research: The experience of IT researchers, Higher Education Research and Development 24: 215-32.
18. Pratt, D. and Assoc. 1998. Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
19. Presser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1999. Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
20. Prosser, M., E. Martin, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden, and II. Middleton. In press. University academics' experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science.
21. Samuelowicz, K., and J. Bain. 1992. Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers, Higher Education 24:93-112.
22. _. 2001. Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education 41: 299-395.
23. Wood, K. 2000. The experience of learning to teach: Changing student teachers' ways of understandingteaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies 32: 75-93.