Day Hospital and Residential Addiction Treatment: Randomized and Nonrandomized Managed Care Clients

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 947-959

  Witbrodt, Jane ^a   Bond, Jason ^a   Kaskutas, Lee Ann ^a   Weisner, Constance ^b   Jaeger, Gary ^c   Pating, David ^d   Moore, Charles ^e  

^a ALCOHOL RESEARCH GROUP   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Kaiser San Francisco Medical Center   (United States)

^e Kaiser Chem Dependence Recovery P   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcoholics Anonymous; ASAM patient placement criteria; selection bias; self help; social model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAY HOSPITAL; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANAGED CARE; NATURALISTIC INQUIRY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZATION; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MALE; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES; RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38149048390     PISSN: 0022006X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.947     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alcoholics Anonymous. Alcoholics Anonymous. 4th ed. (2001), Author, New York
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. (2000), Author, Washington, DC
3. American Society of Addiction Medicine. Patient placement criteria for the treatment of substance-related disorders. 2nd ed. (1996), Author, Chevy Chase, MD
4. Babor T.F., Steinberg K., Anton R., and Del Boca F. Talk is cheap: Measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. Journal of Studies in Alcohol 61 1 (2000) 55-63
5. Barrows D. The community orientation of social model and medical model recovery programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 1 (1998) 55-64
6. Belenko S., Patapis N., and French M.T. Economic benefits of drug treatment: A critical review of the evidence for policy makers (2005), Treatment Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
7. Borkman T.J., Kaskutas L.A., Room J., and Barrows D. An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 1 (1998) 7-17
8. Brown M.B., and Forsythe A.B. Robust tests for equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69 (1974) 364-367
9. Bucholz K.K., Marion S.L., Shayka J.J., and Marcus S.C. A short computer interview for obtaining psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiatric Services 47 (1996) 293-297
10. De Leon G. The therapeutic community: Theory, model, and method (2000), Springer, New York
11. Deck D., Gabriel R., Knudsen J., and Grams G. Impact of patient placement criteria on substance abuse treatment under the Oregon health plan. Journal of Addictive Diseases 22 Suppl. 1 (2003) 27-44
12. Diggle P.J., Liang K.-Y., and Zeger S.L. Analysis of longitudinal data (1996), Oxford University Press, New York
13. Finney J.W., Hahn A.C., and Moos R.H. The effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse: The need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects. Addiction 91 (1996) 1773-1796
14. Gastfriend D.R., Rubin A., Sharon E., Turner W.M., Anton R.F., Donovan D.M., et al. New constructs and assessments for relapse and continued use potential in the ASAM patient placement criteria. Journal of Addictive Diseases 22 Suppl. 1 (2003) 95-111
15. Gerstein D.R., and Harwood H.J. Treating drug problems: Vol. 1. A study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drug treatment systems (1990), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
16. Humphreys K., Huebsch P.D., Finney J.W., and Moos R.H. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research 23 (1999) 558-563
17. Humphreys K., and Noke J.M. The influence of posttreatment mutual help group participation on the friendship networks of substance abuse patients. American Journal of Community Psychology 25 1 (1997) 1-16
18. Humphreys K., and Weisner C. Use of exclusion criteria in selecting research subjects and its effect on the generalizability of alcohol treatment outcome studies. American Journal of Psychiatry 157 (2000) 588-594
19. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems (1990), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
20. Institute of Medicine & Division of Mental Health and Behavioral Medicine. Prevention and treatment of alcohol problems: Research opportunities (1989), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
21. Juster H.R., Heimberg R.G., and Engelberg B. Self-selection and sample selection in a treatment study of social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33 (1995) 321-324
22. Kaskutas L.A., Greenfield T.K., Borkman T.J., and Room J.A. Measuring treatment philosophy: A scale for substance abuse recovery programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 1 (1998) 27-36
23. Kaskutas L.A., Keller J.W., and Witbrodt J. Measuring social model in California: How much has changed?. Contemporary Drug Problems 26 (1999) 607-631
24. Kaskutas L.A., Marsh D., and Kohn A. Didactic and experiential education in substance abuse programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 1 (1998) 43-54
25. Kaskutas L.A., Witbrodt J., and French M.T. Outcomes and costs of day hospital treatment and nonmedical day treatment for chemical dependency. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 65 (2004) 371-382
26. Levine H.J., Turner W., Reif S., Janas D., and Gastfriend D.R. Determining service variations between and within ASAM levels of care. Journal of Addictive Diseases 22 Suppl. 1 (2003) 9-25
27. Little R.J.A., and Rubin D.B. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. (2002), Wiley, New York
28. Longabaugh R., and Morgenstern J. Cognitive-behavioral coping-skills therapy for alcohol dependence. Current status and future directions. Alcohol Research & Health 23 2 (1999) 78-85
29. Magura S., Fong C., Staines G.L., Cleland C., Foote J., Rosenblum A., et al. The combined effects of treatment intensity, self-help groups and patient attributes on drinking outcomes. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 37 1 (2005) 85-92
30. Magura S., Staines G., Kosanke N., Rosenblum A., Foote J., DeLuca A., et al. Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria for naturalistically matched vs. mismatched alcoholism patients. American Journal on Addictions 12 (2003) 386-397
31. McKay J.R., Alterman A.I., McLellan A.T., Boardman C.R., Mulvaney F.D., and O'Brien C.P. Random versus nonrandom assignment in the evaluation of treatment for cocaine abusers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66 (1998) 697-701
32. McKay J.R., Alterman A.I., McLellan A.T., and Snider E.C. Treatment goals, continuity of care, and outcome in a day hospital substance abuse rehabilitation program. American Journal of Psychiatry 150 (1993) 254-259
33. McKay J.R., Alterman A.I., McLellan A.T., Snider E.C., and O'Brien C.P. The effect of random versus nonrandom assignment in a comparison of inpatient and day hospital rehabilitation for male alcoholics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 63 (1995) 70-78
34. McLellan A.T., Alterman A.I., Cacciola J., Metzger D., and O'Brien C.P. A new measure of substance abuse treatment: Initial studies of the Treatment Services Review. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 180 (1992) 101-110
35. McLellan A.T., Grissom G., Alterman A.I., Brill P., and O'Brien C.P. Substance abuse treatment in the private setting: Are some programs more effective than others?. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 27 (1993) 561-570
36. McLellan A.T., Grissom G.R., Zanis D., Randall M., Brill P., and O'Brien C.P. Problem-service "matching" in addiction treatment: A prospective study in four programs. Archives of General Psychiatry 54 (1997) 730-735
37. Miller W.R. Matching individuals with interventions. In: Hester R.K., and Miller W.R. (Eds). Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (1989), Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY 261-271
38. Miller W.R., and Hester R.K. Inpatient alcoholism treatment: Who benefits?. American Psychologist 41 (1986) 794-805
39. Moos R.H., Finney J.W., Ouimette P.C., and Suchinsky R.T. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: I. Treatment orientation, amount of care, and 1-year outcomes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 23 (1999) 529-536
40. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 22 (1998) 1300-1311
41. Rehm J. Selection and self-selection: How to determine the real impact of alcohol on health-care utilization and costs?. Addiction 100 1 (2005) 28-29
42. Rubin A., and Gastfriend D.R. Patient placement criteria and their relation to access to appropriate level of care and engagement in alcoholism treatment. Recent Developments in Alcoholism 15 (2001) 157-176
43. Stout R.L., Wirtz P.W., Carbonari J.P., and Del Boca F.K. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 12 Suppl. (1994) 70-75
44. Strohmetz D.B., Alterman A.I., and Walter D. Subject selection bias in alcoholics volunteering for a treatment study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 14 (1990) 736-738
45. Timko C., Finney J.W., Moos R.H., and Steinbaum D.P. The process of treatment selection among previously untreated help-seeking problem drinkers. Journal of Substance Abuse 5 (1993) 203-220
46. Tunis S.R., Stryer D.B., and Clancy C.M. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Journal of the American Medical Association 290 (2003) 1624-1632
47. Weisner C., Mertens J., Parthasarathy S., and Moore C. Integrating primary medical care with addiction treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 286 (2001) 1715-1723
48. Weisner C., Mertens J., Parthasarathy S., Moore C., Hunkeler E., Hu T.-W., et al. The outcome and cost of alcohol and drug treatment in an HMO: Day hospital versus traditional outpatient regimens. Health Services Research 35 (2000) 791-812