Measuring treatment philosophy: A scale for substance abuse recovery programs

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 27-36

  Kaskutas, Lee Ann ^a   Greenfield, Thomas K ^a   Borkman, Thomasina J ^b   Room, Joshua A ^a  

^a ALCOHOL RESEARCH GROUP   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical; Psychometrics; Social model; Therapeutic community; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; ENVIRONMENT; GROUP THERAPY; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; REHABILITATION; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

HUMANS; PHILOSOPHY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0031916615     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00246-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Attkisson, C.C., & Greenfield, T.K. (1994). The client satisfaction questionnaire-8 and the service satisfaction scale-30. In M.A. Maruish (Ed.), Psychological testing: Treatment planning and outcome assessment. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Baker T.B., Sobell M.B., Sobell L.C., Cannon D.S. Halfway houses for alcoholics. A review, analysis and comparison with other halfway house facilities The International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 22:1976;130-139.
3. Ball, J.C., & Ross, A. (1991). The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: Patients, programs, services, and outcome. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Borkman, T. (1983). A social-experiential model in programs for alcoholism recovery: A research report on a new treatment design. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Research Report, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 83-1259).
5. Borkman, T. (1990). A comparison of social model and clinical model services. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 45-52). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
6. Borkman, T. (1992). Self-help mutual aid groups: An experiential learning perspective. San Diego, CA: Developing Social Model Resources.
7. Borkman T., Kaskutas L.A., Room J., Bryan K., Barrows D. An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;7-17.
8. Bromet E.J., Moos R.H. Environmental resources and the posttreatment functioning of alcoholic parents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 18:1977;326-338.
9. Bromet E.J., Moos R.H., Bliss F. The social climate of alcoholism treatment programs. Archives of General Psychiatry. 33:1976;910-922.
10. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16:1951;297-334.
11. Davidson L., Tebes J.K., Rakfeldt J., Sledge W.H. Differences in social environment between inpatient and day hospital. Crisis respite settings Psychiatric Services. 47:1996;714-720.
12. DeLeon, G., & Melnick, G. (1996). Therapeutic Community Scale of Essential Elements questionnaire. New York: Center for Therapeutic Community Research at National Development and Research Institutes.
13. Dodd, M.H. (1991). Social model of recovery. Marysville, CA: Pathways Board/Management Retreat.
14. Finney J., Moos R.H. Environment assessment and evaluation research. examples from mental health and substance abuse programs Evaluation and Program Planning. 7(2):1984;151-168.
15. Institute of Medicine. (1990). Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Jerrell, J.M., & Hargreaves, W.A. (1989). Community Social Model Philosophy Scale (CSMPS): Preliminary report. Berkeley, CA: Institute for Mental Health Services Research.
17. Kaskutas, L.A. (1996). Preliminary methodology report on the development of the Social Model Philosophy Scale. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Department of Health and Human Services (Contract No. 270-94-0001).
18. Lyons J.P., Welte J.W., Brown J., Sokolow L., Hynes G. Variation in alcoholism treatment orientation. Differential impact upon specific subpopulations Alcoholism. Clinical and Experimental Research 6:1982;333-343.
19. McLellan, A.T. (1983). Patient characteristics associated with outcome [Treatment Research Monograph DHHS Publication]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
20. McLellan A.T., Alterman A.I., Woody G.E., Metzger D. A quantitative measure of substance abuse treatments. The treatment services review Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 180:1992;100-109.
21. Melnick, G., & De Leon, G. (1997). Clarifying the nature of therapeutic community treatment: First validation study of the survey of essential elements questionnaire (SEEQ).
22. Moos, R.H. (1973). Group Environment Scale technical report. Stanford, CA: Social Ecology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University.
23. Moos, R.H. (1986a). Group environment scale manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
24. Moos, R.H. (1986b). Work Environment Scale manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
25. Moos R.H. Understanding environments. The key to improving social processes and program outcomes American Journal of Community Psychology. 24:1996;193.
26. Moos, R.H., Finney, J.W., & Cronkite, R.C. (1990). Alcoholism treatment: Context, process, and outcome. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Moos R.H., Houts P.S. Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 73:1968;595-604.
28. Moos, R.H. & Moos, B.S. (1981). Family Environment Scale Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
29. O'Briant, R.G., Lennard, H.L., Allen, S.D., & Ransom, D.C. (1973). Recovery from alcoholism: A social treatment model. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
30. Room, J. (1996). Social Model Philosophy Scale manual: Guidelines for scale administration and interpretation: Residential, non-residential and detoxification alcohol and drug programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Department of Health and Human Services (Contract No. 270-94-0001).
31. Saquet-Shire, J. (1981). Time in the house: A study of alcoholic women in halfway house recovery. Chicago, IL: Department of Sociology, Northeastern University.
32. Swindle R.W., Peterson K.A., Paradise M.J., Moos R.H. Measuring substance abuse program treatment orientations. The Drug and Alcohol Program Treatment Inventory Journal of Substance Abuse. 7:1995;61-78.
33. Wittman, F.D. (1992). Alternative continuum for community-based recovery services: A reply from a social model perspective to the OTI comprehensive treatment model. Berkeley, CA: Institute for the Study of Social Change.