An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 7-17

  Borkman, Thomasina J ^a   Kaskutas, Lee Ann ^b   Room, Joshua ^b   Bryan, Kathy ^b   Barrows, David ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ALCOHOL RESEARCH GROUP   (United States)

^c #24 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Alcoholics Anonymous; Literature review; Para professionals; Social model; Treatment outcome; Treatment programs

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DETOXIFICATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; EMPLOYMENT; FAMILY LIFE; GROUP THERAPY; ORGANIZATION; PHILOSOPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION; RESIDENTIAL CARE; REVIEW; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0031952847     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00244-4     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Inc. (1991). Twelve steps and twelve traditions (45th Ed.). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous Publishing.
2. Armor, D.J., Polich, J.M., & Stambul, H.B. (1976). Alcoholism and treatment. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corp.
3. Barrows, D.C. (1980). Informal interactions at an alcohol recovery home. Presented at 40th Annual Meeting of Society for Applied Anthropology. Denver, CO, March 17, 1980.
4. Barrows, D. (1997). Social model recovery in the community. In Report of a process evaluation of social model residential programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
5. Bi-Bett Corporation. (1976). Basic beliefs, definitions, philosophy and interpretations as they relate to community alcoholism programs operated by Bi-Bett Corporation, (Guide). Concord, California.
6. Bi-Bett Corporation. (1989). Bi-Bett career ladder and review steps. Concord, California.
7. Blacksher, S. (1990). A chronology of the development of the California Alcohol Program. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 215-222). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
8. Borkman, T. (1982). Third generation mutual self-help organizations: Social model alcoholism recovery programs. Presented at Southern Sociological Society Annual Meeting, Memphis, TN, April 15.
9. Borkman, T. (1983). A social-experiential model in programs for alcoholism recovery: A research report on a new treatment design. (Research Report, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 83-1259). National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
10. Borkman, T. (1986). The Alcohol Services Reporting System (ASRS) revision study. (Revision Study, Contract No. A-0097-4). California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Health and Welfare Agency, State of California.
11. Borkman, T. (1990a). A comparison of social model and clinical model services. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 45-52). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
12. Borkman, T. (1990b). KARE and SHARE: A sociologist's investigation of two social model programs. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach. Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
13. Borkman, T. (1997). "Client" governance in social model recovery programs. In Report of a process evaluation of social model residential programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
14. Borkman, T.J., Kaskutas, L.A., & Barrows, D.C. (1996). The social model program: A literature review and history. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
15. Brown, D.E. (1979). Recovery support services. Presented at Meeting in Los Angeles with Mr. John Deluca, Director of NIAAA. Los Angeles, June 5th.
16. Bryan, K., & Kohn, A. (1997). A study of rituals in a women's social model recovery program. In Report of a process evaluation of social model residential programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
17. California Association of Alcoholic Recovery Homes. (1974). Alcoholic recovery homes: Principles, guidelines, recommendations. Paper prepared for State of California, Office of Special Services, Alcohol Program Management.
18. California Association of Alcoholic Recovery Homes. (1981). Procedures and reference documents for recovery home volunteer peer reviewers. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
19. California Association of Alcoholic Recovery Homes. (1992). Accreditation for alcoholic recovery homes and other social model alcohol programs. Sacramento, CA: Author.
20. Colthurst, T. (1991). Developing staff for social model recovery programs: Recommendations for a San Diego County Social Model Training System and a California Social Model Leadership Development Program. University of California, San Diego Extension.
21. De Leon G., Jainchill N., Wexler H. Success and improvement rates 5 years after treatment in a Therapeutic Community. International Journal of the Addictions. 17:1982;703-747.
22. De Leon, G. (1984). The therapeutic community: Study of effectiveness (Treatment Research Monograph 84-1286). Rockville, MD: NIDA.
23. De Leon, G. (1994). Therapeutic communities. In M. Galanter & H.D. Kleber (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Press textbook of substance abuse treatment (pp. 391-414). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
24. Dodd, M. (1990). Alcoholic recovery homes. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach. Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
25. Finney, J.W., Moos, R.H., & Chan, D.A. (1981). "Length of stay and program component effects in the treatment of alcoholism: A comparison of two techniques for process analysis". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 120-131.
26. Gerstein, D.R., Johnson, R.A., Foote, M., Suter, N., Jack, K., Merker, G., Turner, S., Bailey, R., Malloy, K.M., Williams, E., Harwood, H., & Fountain, D. (1994a). Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA): Methodology report. Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
27. Gerstein, D.R., Johnson, R.A., Harwood, H., Fountain, D., Suter, N., & Malloy, K. (1994b). Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA): Executive Report. (Publication No. ADP 94-628). Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
28. Gerstein, D.R., Johnson, R.A., Harwood, H., Fountain, D., Suter, N., & Malloy, K. (1994c). Evaluating recovery services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (CALDATA): General report. (Publication No. ADP 94-629). Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
29. Gottheil E., McLellan A.T., Druley K.A. Length of stay, patient severity and treatment outcome. Sample data from the field of alcoholism Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 53:1992;69-75.
30. Hayes, B., Blacksher, S., Dodd, M., Fox, T., Lewis, K., & Wittman, F.D. (1993). The social community model for the treatment of alcohol and other drug problems. A report by the Social Model Consensus Panel convened by the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Los Angeles, CA.
31. Hester, R.K. (1994). Outcome research: Alcoholism. In M. Galanter & H.D. Kleber (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Press textbook of substance abuse treatment (pp. 35-43). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
32. Holder H., Longabaugh R., Miller W.R., Rubonis A.V. The cost effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism. A first approximation Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 52:1991;517-540.
33. Hubbard, R.L., Marsden, M.E., Rachal, J.V., Harwood, H.J., Cavanaugh, E.R., & Ginzburg, H.M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of treatment effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
34. Institute of Medicine. (1990). Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Karp, R.C. (1997). AA traditions one and seven as adapted by social model substance abuse programs. In Report of a process evaluation of social model residential programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
36. Kaskutas, L.A. (1996). Cost checklist: Peer helping and hidden costs in social model programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
37. Kaskutas, L.A. (in press). Hip and helpful: Alcoholics Anonymous in Marin County, California. In P. Rosenqvist & I. Eisenbach-Stengl (Eds.), International Collaborative Study on Alcoholics Anonymous. Volume 2: Case studies of AA in eight countries. Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research.
38. Kaskutas, L.A., Borkman, T., Wittman, F., Room, J., Karp, R., Bryan, D., Barrows, D., Wilson, M., Kohn, A., Marsh, D., & Campt, D. (1997). Report of a process evaluation of social model residential programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
39. Kaskutas, L.A., Greenfield, T.K., Borkman, T.J., & Room, J.A. (1996). Development of a Social Model Philosophy Scale for substance abuse recovery programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
40. Kaskutas L.A., Marsh D., Kohn A. Didactic and experiential education in substance abuse programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;43-53.
41. Kaskutas L.A. Measuring treatment philosophy. A scale for substance abuse recovery programs Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;27-36.
42. Lilienfeld, A.M., & Lilienfeld, D.E. (1980). Foundations of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Maton K.I., Salem D.A. Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings. American Journal of Community Psychology. 23:1995;631-656.
44. McMillan B., Florin P., Stevenson J., Kerman B., Mitchell R.E. Empowerment praxis in community coalition. American Journal of Community Psychology. 23:1995;699-728.
45. Miller W.R., Hester R.K. Inpatient alcoholism treatment. Who benefits? American Psychologist. 41:1986;794-805.
46. Miller W.R., Kurtz E. Models of alcoholism used in treatment. Contrasting AA and other perspectives with which it is often confused Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 55:1994;159-166.
47. Molloy, J.P. (1990). Self-run, self-supported houses for more effective recovery from alcohol and drug addiction. (DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 92-1678). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
48. Nebelkopf, E. (1993). California's biopsychosocial model: Does comprehensive mean holistic? Presented at California Association of Drug Program & Professionals: January 17.
49. O'Briant, R.G., Lennard, H.L., Allen, S.D., & Ransom, D.C. (1973). Recovery from alcoholism: A social treatment model. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
50. O'Briant, R.G., & Petersen, N.W. (1990). Social setting detoxification. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.). Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 23-30). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
51. O'Neill, J.V. (1990). History of Oxford House Inc. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 103-118). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
52. Pike, T.P. (1979). Memoirs of Thomas P. Pike. Los Angeles, CA: Grant Dahlstrom.
53. Polich, J.M., Armor, D.J., & Braiker, H.B. (1980). The course of alcoholism: Four years after treatment. Santa Monica, CA, Rand Corporation.
54. Regier, M.C. (1979). Social policy in action: Perspectives on the implementation of alcoholism reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
55. Reissman F. The "helper therapy" principle. Social Work. 10:1965;27-32.
56. Reynolds, R., & Ryan, B. (1990). Policy implications of social model alcohol recovery services. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 31-38). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus Inc.
57. Room J. (1996). Social Model Philosophy Scale (SMPS) Manual: Guidelines for scale administration and interpretation: Residential, non-residential and detoxification alcohol and drug programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
58. Room, J. (1997). "No big shots or little shots here:" Staffing principles and roles at medical and social model substance use treatment facilities. In Report of a process evaluation of social model residential programs. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
59. Room J. Work and identity in substance abuse recovery. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15:1998;65-74.
60. San Diego County Alcohol Programs. (undated). Neighborhood Recovery Center handbook. San Diego, CA: Author.
61. San Diego County Department of Health Services. (1983). 18-Month participant outcome study: Final report. San Diego, CA: Author.
62. Schonlau, K. (1990). Recovery homes: Development and operation. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 67-74). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
63. Shaw, S. (1990). Recovery of a neighborhood recovery center. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.), Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach. Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
64. Siegler M., Osmond H., Newell S. Models of alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 29:1968;571-579.
65. Simpson D., Sells B. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse. An overview of the DARP research program Advances in Alcohol Abuse. 2:1982;7-29.
66. Sober Living Network. (1995). Sober Living, 1(1).
67. U.S. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1993). A sampling of definitions of social model recovery. Rockville, MD: U.S. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Social Model Recovery Evaluation Design Project.
68. University of California at San Diego. (1986). California's social model of recovery from alcoholism. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego Extension.
69. University of California at San Diego. (1988). The future of the California social model. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego Extension.
70. University of California at San Diego. (1989). Planning social model services. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego Extension.
71. University of California at San Diego. (1990). Financing community-based recovery services. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego Extension.
72. University of California at San Diego. (1993). Recommendations for evaluation of social model recovery programs: Report of an expert panel. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego Extension.
73. Weisner C. The merging of alcohol and drug treatment. a policy review Journal of Public Health Policy. 13:1992;66-80.
74. Wittman, F., Lifchez, R., Crowell, C., Johnson, T., Post, H., & Stoltz, N. (1976). Environmental design for social model alcoholism programs. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
75. Wittman, F.D. (1992). Community planning to prevent problems related to alcohol availability: Observations on the use and effectiveness of an environmental approach. Presented at Research Symposium on Driving Under the Influence. Automobile Club of Southern California, November 16-17.
76. Wittman, F.D., Biderman, F., & Hughes, L., (ed.). (1993). Sober living guidebook for alcohol and drug free housing. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
77. Wright, A. (1990). Los Angeles County's alcohol free living centers: Long term, low cost sober housing. In S. Shaw & T. Borkman (Eds.). Social model alcohol recovery: An environmental approach (pp. 119-128). Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, Inc.
78. Wright, A. (1995). Answering the threat to recovery services and county budgets. La Canada, CA: Al Wright & Associates.