Outcomes and costs of day hospital treatment and nonmedical day treatment for chemical dependency

Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 371-382

  Kaskutas, Lee Ann ^a,b   Witbrodt, Jane ^a   French, Michael T ^a,c  

^a ALCOHOL RESEARCH GROUP   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL ABSTINENCE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EMPLOYMENT; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INCOME; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE;

EID: 2542616716     PISSN: 0096882X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.371     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ALTERMAN, A.I., O'BRIEN, C.P., MCLELLAN, A.T., AUGUST, D.S., SNIDER, E.C., DROBA, M., CORNISH, J.W., HALL, C.P., RAPHAELSON, A.H. AND SCHRADE, F.X. Effectiveness and costs of inpatient versus day hospital cocaine rehabilitation. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 182: 157-163, 1994.
2. ANNIS, H.M. Is inpatient rehabilitation of the alcoholic cost effective? Con position. Adv. Alcohol Subst. Abuse 5: 175-190, 1986.
3. BABOR, T.F., STEINBERG, K., ANTON, R. AND DEL BOCA, F. Talk is cheap: Measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. J. Stud. Alcohol 61: 55-63, 2000.
4. BARNETT, P.G., ZARIC, G.S. AND BRANDEAU, M.L. The cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine maintenance therapy for opiate addiction in the United States. Addiction 96: 1267-1278, 2001.
5. BORKMAN, T. A comparison of social model and clinical model services. In: SHAW, S. AND BORKMAN, T. (Eds.) Social Model Alcohol Recovery: An Environmental Approach, Burbank, CA: Bridge Focus, 1990, pp. 45-52.
6. BORKMAN, T.J., KASKUTAS, L.A., ROOM, J. AND BARROWS, D. An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 15: 7-17, 1998.
7. BUCHOLZ, K.K., MARION, S.L., SHAYKA, J.J. AND MARCUS, S.C. A short computer interview for obtaining psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiat. Serv. 47: 293-297, 1996.
8. COVIELLO, D.M., ALTERMAN, A.I., RUTHERFORD, M.J., CACCIOLA, J.S., MCKAY, J.R. AND ZANIS, D.A. The effectiveness of two intensities of psychosocial treatment for cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 61: 145-154, 2001.
9. DE LEON, G. The Therapeutic Community: Theory, Model, and Method, New York: Springer, 2000.
10. DRUMMOND, M.F., O'BRIEN, B.J., STODDART, G.L. AND TORRANCE, G.W. (Eds.) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 2nd Edition, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.
11. FINK, E.B., LONGABAUGH, R., MCCRADY, B.M., STOUT, R.L., BEATTIE, M., RUGGIERI-AUTHELET, A. AND MCNEIL, D. Effectiveness of alcoholism treatment in partial versus inpatient settings: Twenty-four month outcomes. Addict. Behav. 10: 235-248, 1985.
12. FINNEY, J.W. AND MONAHAN, S.C. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: A second approximation. J. Stud. Alcohol 57: 220-243, 1996.
13. FRENCH, M.T. Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP): Program Version, 7th Edition, Coral Gables, FL: Department of Sociology, University of Miami (available at: www.datcap.com), 2001a.
14. FRENCH, M.T. The role of health economics in substance abuse research: Recent advances and future opportunities. In: GALANTER, M. (Ed.) Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Vol. 15: Services Research in the Era of Managed Care, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2001b, pp. 201-208.
15. FRENCH, M.T. Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP): Program Version, User's Manual, 7th Edition, Coral Gables, FL: Department of Sociology, University of Miami (available at: www.datcap.com), 2001c.
16. FRENCH, M.T., DUNLAP, L.J., ZARKIN, G.A., MCGEARY, K.A. AND MCLELLAN, A.T. A structured instrument for estimating the economic cost of drug abuse treatment: the Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP). J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 14: 445-455, 1997.
17. FRENCH, M.T., MCCOLLISTER, K.E., SACKS, S., MCKENDRICK, K. AND DE LEON, G. Benefit-cost analysis of a modified therapeutic community for mentally ill chemical abusers. Eval. Prog. Plan. 25: 137-148, 2002a.
18. FRENCH, M.T., SALOMÉ, H.J. AND CARNEY, M. Using the DATCAP and ASI to estimate the costs and benefits of residential addiction treatment in the state of Washington. Social Sci. Med. 55: 2267-2282, 2002b.
19. FRENCH, M.T., SALOMÉ, H.J., KRUPSKI, A., MCKAY, J.R., DONOVAN, D.M., MCLELLAN, A.T. AND DURELL, J. Benefit-cost analysis of residential and outpatient addiction treatment in the state of Washington. Eval. Rev. 24: 609-634, 2000.
20. FRENCH, M.T., SALOMÉ, H.J., SINDELAR, J.L. AND MCLELLAN, A.T. Benefit-cost analysis of addiction treatment: Methodological guidelines and application using the DATCAP and ASI. Hlth Serv. Res. 37: 433-455, 2002c.
21. GOLD, M.R., SIEGEL, J.E., RUSSELL, L.B. AND WEINSTEIN, M.C. (Eds.) Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1996.
22. GUYDISH, J., SORENSEN, J.L., CHAN, M., WERDEGAR, D., BOSTROM, A. AND ACAMPORA, A. A randomized trial comparing day and residential drug abuse treatment: 18-month outcomes. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 67: 428-434, 1999.
23. HARWOOD, H.J., FOUNTAIN, D. AND LIVERMORE, G. The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992, NIH Publication No. 98-4327, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1998.
24. INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
25. KASKUTAS, L.A. Methodology and characteristics of programs and clients in the social model process evaluation. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 15: 19-25, 1998.
26. KASKUTAS, L.A. AND BORKMAN, T. A Process Evaluation of Social Model and Clinical Model Substance Abuse Recovery Programs, Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1996.
27. KASKUTAS, L.A., KELLER, J.W. AND WITBRODT, J. Measuring social model in California: How much has changed? Contemp. Drug Probl. 26: 607-631, 1999.
28. KASKUTAS, L.A., MARSH, D. AND KOHN, A. Didactic and experiential education in substance abuse programs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 15: 43-53, 1998.
29. KENKEL, D. On valuing morbidity, cost-effectiveness analysis, and being rude. J. Hlth Econ. 16: 749-757, 1997.
30. LAMB, S., GREENLICK, M.R. AND MCCARTY, D. Bridging the Gap between Practice and Research: Forging Partnerships with Community-Based Drug and Alcohol Treatment, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.
31. LONGABAUGH, R., MCCRADY, B., FINK, E., STOUT, R., MCAULEY, T., DOYLE, C. AND MCNEILL, D. Cost effectiveness of alcoholism treatment in partial vs inpatient settings: Six-month outcomes. J. Stud. Alcohol 44: 1049-1071, 1983.
32. MCCOLLISTER, K.E., FRENCH, M.T., INCIARDI, J.A., BUTZIN, C.A., MARTIN, S.S. AND HOOPER, R.M. Post-release substance abuse treatment for criminal offenders: A cost-effectiveness analysis. J. Quant. Criminol. 19: 389-407, 2003.
33. MCKAY, J.R., ALTERMAN, A.I., MCLELLAN, A.T., SNIDER, E.C. AND O'BRIEN, C.P. The effect of random versus nonrandom assignment in a comparison of inpatient and day hospital rehabilitation for male alcoholics. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 63: 70-78, 1995.
34. MCLACHLAN, J.F.C. AND STEIN, R.L. Evaluation of a day clinic for alcoholics. J. Stud. Alcohol 43: 261-272, 1982.
35. MCLELLAN, A.T., ALTERMAN, A.I., CACCIOLA, J., METZGER, D. AND O'BRIEN, C.P. A new measure of substance abuse treatment: Initial studies of the treatment services review. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 180: 101-110, 1992.
36. MCLELLAN, A.T., GRISSOM, G.R., BRILL, P., DURELL, J., METZGER, D.S. AND O'BRIEN, C.P. Private substance abuse treatments: Are some programs more effective than others? J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 10: 243-254, 1993.
37. MCLELLAN, A.T., HAGAN, T.A., MEYERS, K., RANDALL, M. AND DURELL, J. "Intensive" outpatient substance abuse treatment: Comparisons with "traditional" outpatient treatment. J. Addict. Dis. 16: 57-84, 1997.
38. MCLELLAN, A.T., WOODY, G.E., METZGER, D., MCKAY, J., DURELL, J., ALTERMAN, A.I. AND O'BRIEN, C.P. Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: Reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. Milbank Q. 74: 51-85, 1996.
39. MAXWELL, S.E. AND DELANEY, H.D. Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1990.
40. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM. Tenth Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and Health: Highlights from Current Research, NIH Publication No. 00-1583, Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 2000.
41. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE. Blue Ribbon Task Force on NIDA Health Services Research: Final Report, Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2004.
42. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE AND NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM. Group Therapy for Individuals in Drug Abuse or Alcohol Treatment, RFA-DA-04-008, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 2003.
43. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. NIH Roadmap Initiatives (accessed at: http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/initiatives.asp, 1/30/04), Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 2003.
44. PIPER, B., BRIGGS, M., HUFFMAN, K. AND LUBOT-CONK, R. State of the States. Drug Policy Reforms: 1996-2002, New York, Drug Policy Alliance (available at: www.drugpolicy.org), 2003.
45. POTAMIANOS, G., NORTH, W.R., MEADE, T.W., TOWNSEND, J. AND PETERS, T.J. Randomised trial of community-based centre versus conventional hospital management in treatment of alcoholism. Lancet 2: 797-799, 1986.
46. PROJECT MATCH RESEARCH GROUP. Project MATCH: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment. Alcsm Clin. Exp. Res. 17: 1130-1145, 1993.
47. PUBLIC LAW. Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (SACPA, Proposition 36). Chapter 2.5, Division 4, Title 9, California Code of Regulations (CCR); Divisions 10.8 and 10.9, Health and Safety Code, Sacramento, CA: State of California, 2000.
48. ROEBUCK, M.C., FRENCH, M.T. AND MCLELLAN, A.T. DATStats: Results from 85 studies using the Drug Abuse Treatment Cost Analysis Programs (DATCAPs). J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 25: 51-57, 2003.
49. SALOMÉ, H.J. AND FRENCH, M.T. Using cost and financial instruments for economic evaluation of substance abuse treatment services. In: GALANTER, M. (Ed.) Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Vol. 15: Services Research in the Era of Managed Care, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2001, pp. 253-269.
50. SCHMIDT, L. AND WEISNER, C. Developments in alcoholism treatment. In: GALANTER, M. (Ed.) Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Vol. 11: Ten Years of Progress, New York: Plenum, 1993, pp. 369-396.
51. SHAPIRO, S.S., WILK, M.B. AND CHEN, H.J. A comparative study of various tests for normality. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 63: 1343-1372, 1968.
52. SPSS, INC. SPSS for Windows, Release 10.0.5, Standard Version, Chicago, IL: SPSS, 1999.
53. STEVENS, J. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 2nd Edition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.
54. STOUT, R.L., WIRTZ, P.W., CARBONARI, J.P. AND DEL BOCA, F.K. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J. Stud. Alcohol, Supplement No. 12, pp. 70-75, 1994.
55. WEISNER, C., MCCARTY, D. AND SCHMIDT, L. New directions in alcohol and drug treatment under managed care. Amer. J. Manag. Care 5: SP57-SP69, 1999.
56. WEISNER, C., MERTENS, J., PARTHASARATHY, S., MOORE, C., HUNKELER, E.M., HU, T. AND SELBY, J.V. The outcome and cost of alcohol and drug treatment in an HMO: Day hospital versus traditional outpatient regimens. Hlth Serv. Res. 35: 791-812, 2000.
57. ZARKIN, G.A., LINDROOTH, R.C., DEMIRALP, B. AND WECHSBERG, W. The cost and cost-effectiveness of an enhanced intervention for people with substance abuse problems at risk for HIV. Hlth Serv. Res. 36: 335-355, 2001.