Reasoning with conditionals: Does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2060-2074

  Geiger, Sonja M ^a,c   Oberauer, Klaus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c Department of Psychology ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONDITIONING; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; PROBABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING;

EID: 38149042641     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192938     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ANDERSON, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.
2. BYRNE, R. M. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition, 31, 61-83.
3. BYRNE, R. M., ESPINO, O., & SANTAMARIA, C. (1999). Counterexamples and the suppression of interferences. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 347-373.
4. CUMMINS, D. D. (1995). Naive theories and causal deduction. Memory & Cognition, 23, 646-658.
5. CUMMINS, D. D., LUBART, T., ALKSNIS, O., & RIST, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 274-282.
6. DE NEYS, W., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2002). Causal conditional reasoning and semantic memory retrieval: A test of the semantic memory framework. Memory & Cognition, 30, 908-920.
7. DE NEYS, W., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2003a). Causal conditional reasoning and strength of association: The disabling condition case. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 162-167.
8. DE NEYS, W., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2003b). Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: Every counterexample counts. Memory & Cognition, 31, 581-595.
9. DE NEYS, W., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2005). Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 349-381.
10. DIEUSSAERT, K. SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2002). The relative contribution of content and context factors on the interpretation of conditionals. Experimental Psychology, 49, 181-195.
11. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., HANDLEY, S. J., & OVER, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 321-335.
12. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., & OVER, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., OVER, D. E., & HANDLEY, S. J. (2005). Suppositionals, extensionality, and conditionals: A critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002). Psychological Review, 112, 1040-1052.
14. GEIGER, S. M., & OBERAUER, K. (2006). How necessary is sufficiency for reasoning? A test of two probabilistic theories. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (2001). Mental models and deduction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 434-442.
16. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N., LEGRENZI, P., GIROTTO, V., LEGRENZI, M. S., & CAVERNI, J.-P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62-88.
17. KLACZYNSKI, P. A. (2001). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision making. Child Development, 72, 844-871.
18. MARKOVITS, H., & BARROUILLET, P. (2002). The development of conditional reasoning: A mental model account. Developmental Review, 22, 5-36.
19. MARKOVITS, H., & POTVIN, F. (2001). Suppression of valid inferences and knowledge structures: The curious effect of producing alternative antecedents on reasoning with causal conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 29, 736-744.
20. MARKOVITS, H., & QUINN, S. (2002). Efficiency of retrieval correlates with "logical" reasoning from causal conditional premises. Memory & Cognition, 30, 696-706.
21. OAKSFORD, M., & CHATER, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
22. OAKSFORD, M., & CHATER, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 349-357.
23. OAKSFORD, M., CHATER, N., & LARKIN, J. (2000). Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. Journal of Experimented Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 2B, 883-899.
24. OBERAUER, K. (2006). Reasoning with conditionals: A test of formal models of four theories. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 238-283.
25. OBERAUER, K., GEIGER, S. M., FISCHER, K., & WEIDENFELD, A. (2007). Two meanings of "if"? Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 790-819.
26. OBERAUER, K., & WILHELM, O. (2003). The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 680-693.
27. OVER, D. E., & EVANS, J. ST. B. T. (2003). The probability of conditionals: The psychological evidence. Mind & Language, 18, 340-358.
28. QUINN, S., & MARKOVITS, H. (1998). Conditional reasoning, causality, and the structure of semantic memory: Strength of association as a predictive factor for content effects. Cognition, 68, B93-B101.
29. ROTTENSTREICH, Y., & TVERSKY, A. (1997). Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review, 104, 406-415.
30. SCHROYENS, W., SCHAEKEN, W., & HANDLEY, S. (2003). In search of counter-examples: Deductive rationality in human reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1129-1145.
31. THOMPSON, V. (1995). Conditional reasoning: The necessary and sufficient conditions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 1-60.
32. THOMPSON, V. (2000). Task specific nature of domain general reasoning. Cognition, 76, 209-268.
33. TVERSKY, A., & KOEHLER, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547-567.
34. VERSCHUEREN, N., SCHAEKEN, W., & D'YDEWALLE, G. (2005). A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 239-278.
35. WEIDENFELD, A. (2004). Interpretation of and reasoning with conditionals: Probabilities, mental models, and causality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.
36. WEIDENFELD, A., OBERAUER, K., & HÖRNIG, R. (2005). Causal and noncausal conditionals: An integrated model of interpretation and reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1479-1513.