Adult nontwin sib concordance rates for type 2 diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome among Asian Indians: The Indian Atherosclerosis Research Study

Vascular Health and Risk Management

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1063-1068

  Shanker, Jayashree ^a,e   Kanjilal, Saikat ^b   Rao, Veena S ^a   Perumal, Ganapathy ^a   Khadrinarasimhiah, Natesha B ^a   Mukherjee, Manjari ^c   Iyengar, Shamanna S ^b   Kakkar, Vijay V ^d  

^a THROMBOSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b ST JOHN'S NATIONAL ACADEMY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (India)

^c INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^d THROMBOSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^e NONE   (India)

Author keywords

Asian Indians; CAD; Concordance; Hypertension; Metabolic syndrome; Sib pairs; Spouse pairs; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

LIPID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ENZYMATIC ASSAY; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC TRAIT; HEREDITY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INDIAN; LIFESTYLE; LIPID BLOOD LEVEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTOR; SIBLING; SPOUSE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; INDIA; LIPIDS; MALE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; MIDDLE AGED; SIBLINGS; SPOUSES;

EID: 38149028331     PISSN: 11766344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berg K. 1987. Twin studies of coronary heart disease and its risk factors. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma), 36:439-53.
2. Bloch KV, Klein CH, de Souza A, et al. 2003. Socioeconomic aspects of spousal concordance for hypertension, obesity and smoking in a community of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Arq Bras Cardiol, 80:179-86.
3. Chien KL, Yang CY, Lee YT. 2003. Major gene effects in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in families receiving a health examination in Taiwan. J Hypertens, 21:73-9.
4. Ferrannini E. 1993. Syndrome X. Horm Res, 93:107-11.
5. Gupta R. 2004. Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens, 18:73-8.
6. Hauser ER, Mooser V, Crossman DC, et al. 2003. Design of the Genetics of Early Onset Cardiovascular Disease study. Am Heart J, 145:602-13.
7. Havlik RJ, Garrison RJ, Femlebb M, et al. 1979. Blood pressure aggregation in families. Am J Genet Epidemiol, 110:302-12.
8. Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, et al. 2007. A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science, 316:1491-3.
9. Hunt KJ, Heiss G, Sholinsky PD, et al. 2000. Familial history of metabolic disorders and the multiple metabolic syndrome: the NHLBI family heart study. Genet Epidemiol, 19:395-409.
10. Kannel WB, Wilson PW. 1995. Risk factors that attenuate the female coronary disease advantage. Arch Intern Med, 155:51-61.
11. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. 1998. Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care, 21:1414-31.
12. Kyvik KO, Green A, Beck-Nielsen H. 1995. Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a population based study of Danish twins. BMJ, 311:913-17.
13. Loos RJF, Katzmrazyk PT, Rao DC, et al. 2003. Genome-wide linkage scan for the metabolic syndrome in the HERITAGE Family Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 88:5935-43.
14. McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, et al. 2007. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science, 316:1488-91.
15. Meyer MR, Haas E, Barton M. 2006. Gender differences of cardiovascular disease. Hypertension, 47:1019-26.
16. Misra A, Wasir JS, Pandey RM. 2005. An evaluation of candidate definitions of the metabolic syndrome in adult Asian Indians. Diabetes Care, 20:398-403.
17. [NCEP-ATPIII] National Cholesterol Education Program. 2001. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) 2001. JAMA, 285:2486-97.
18. Poulsen P, Vaag A, Kyvik K, et al. 2001. Genetic versus environmental etiology of the metabolic syndrome among male and female twins. Diabetologia, 44:536-43.
19. Pradeepa R, Deepa R, Mohan V. 2002. Epidemiology of diabetes in India - Current perspective and future predictions. J Indian Med Assoc, 100:144-8.
20. Rafell SR. 1997. Genetics of Diabetes. In: Alberti KGMM, Zimmet P, De Fronzo RA eds. International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus 2nd ed. Vol 1, Chichester: Wiley and Sons, Ltd, p 401-53.
21. Rewers M, Hamman RF. 1995. Risk factors for non-insulin-dependent diabetes. In: National Diabetes Data Group. ed. Diabetes in America, 2nd ed, p 179-220. National Institute of Health/NIDDK, Betheseda, MD.
22. Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS, et al. 2007. Genomewide Association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 357:443-53.
23. Saxena R, Voight BF, Lysenko V, et al. 2007. Genome-wide association identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science, 316:1331-6.
24. Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, et al. 2007. A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. Science, 316:1341-5.
25. Simpson JP, Peek K. 2005. Concordance of chronic condition in older Mexican American couples. Preventing Chronic Disease. Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, 2:1-7.
26. Snehalata S, Vishwanathan V, Ramachandran A. 2003. Cutoff values for normal anthropometric variables in Asian Indian Adults. Diabetes Care, 26:1380-4.
27. Sun-Wei-Guo. 2001. Does higher concordance in monozygotic twins than in dizygotic twins suggest a genetic component?. Hum Heredity, 51:121-32.
28. Thomas JL, Braus PA. 1998. Coronary artery disease in women. A historical perspective. Arch Intern Med, 158:333-7.
29. [WHO] World Health Organization. 2000. World Health Survey. 2000. CVD Infobase [online]. Accessed on August 1, 2007. URL: http://www.who.int/ cardiovascular_diseases/en/