Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: Reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making

Health Expectations

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 189-197

  Thornton, Hazel ^a,c   Edwards, Adrian ^b   Elwyn, Glyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Saionara   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer involvement; Doctor patient relationship; Policy; Risk communicating tools; Shared decision making; The consultation

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSUMER; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION;

DECISION MAKING; FAMILY PRACTICE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; WALES;

EID: 0041689678     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00231.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Dieppe P, Refferty A-M, Kitson A. The clinical encounter - the focal point of patient centred-care. Health Expectations, 2002; 5: 279-281.
2. Majeed A. Ten ways to improve information technology in the NHS. BMJ, 2003; 320: 202-204.
3. Coulter A. The Autonomous Patient. Ending Paternalism in Medical Care. The John Fry Fellowship. London: Nuffield Trust, 2002.
4. Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL. Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice? BMJ, 2002; 325: 78-80.
5. Skrabanek P. The Death of Humane Medicine and the Rise of Coercive Healthism. London: The Social Affairs Unit, 1994.
6. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity, 1991.
7. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Atwell C et al. Shared decision making and risk communication in general practice - a study incorporating systematic literature reviews, psychometric evaluation of outcome measures, and quantitative, qualitative and health economic analyses of a cluster randomised trial of professional skill development. Report to 'Health in Partnership' programme, UK Department of Health. http:// www.healthinpartnership.org/studies/edwards.html. Cardiff: Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, 2002.
8. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Atwell C, Williams S, Thornton H. Consumers' views of quality: identifying the consultation outcomes of importance to consumers, and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches. Health Expectations, 2001; 4: 151-161.
9. Nehammer S, Davis R, Thomas S et al. Qualitative analysis of post-consultation interviews, in Chapter 13. Report to 'Health in Partnership' programme, UK Department of Health. Cardiff: Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, 2002.
10. Atwell C, Pill R, Edwards A, Elwyn G. A qualitative analysis of patient accounts of routine consultations with specially trained practitioners, in Chapter 15. Report to 'Health in Partnership' programme. Cardiff: UK Department of Health. Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, 2002.
11. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K et al. The development of COMRADE - a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 2003; 50: 311-322.
12. Thornton H, Dixon-Woods M. Recruitment of women into trials. Lancet, 2002; 359: 164-165.
13. McKinley RK, Dixon-Woods M, Thornton H. Participating in primary care research. British Journal of General Practice, 2002; 52: 971-972.
14. HMSO, Health Committee. Breast Cancer Services, volume 1. Third Report, para 205, p. lvi. London: House of Commons, 1995.
15. Tobias J. Informed Consent. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
16. NHS Research and Development Programme (Cancer). Using a Consumers' Advisory Group to Increase Accrual into Trials. Project NCP/D18. London: Institute of Cancer Research, 1995.
17. The Institute of Cancer Research. UK Randomised Trial of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) in Women with a History of Early Stage Breast Cancer. Sutton, Surrey: The Institute of Cancer Research, 2002.
18. Chalmers I, Clarke M. Outcomes that matter to patients in tombstone trials. Lancet, 2001; 358: 1649.
19. Longo MF, Cohen DR, Hood K, Edwards A, Robling M, Elwyn G. Risk communication and shared decision-making in primary care: assessing patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment, Chapter 11. Cardiff: Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, 2002.
20. Black WC, Nease RF, Jr, Tosteson AN. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger that 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1995; 87: 720-731.
21. Rakovitch E, Franssen E, Kim J et al. A comparison of risk perception and psychological morbidity in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2003; 77: 285-293.
22. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ, 2002; 324: 827-830.
23. Chapple A, Ziebland S, Shepperd S, Miller R, Herxheimer A, McPherson A. Why men with prostate cancer want wider access to prostate specific antigen testing: qualitative study. BMJ, 2002; 325: 737-742.
24. Thornton H, Dixon-Woods M. Prostate specific antigen testing for prostate cancer. Engaging with the public may address their concerns and produce workable solutions. BMJ, 2002; 325: 725-726.
25. Koops L, Lindley R. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: consumer involvement in design of new randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 2002; 325: 415-417.
26. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M et al. Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ, 2002; 325: 766-769.
27. Refractor. Finding a voice. Lancet, 2002; 359: 2044.