Asymmetric nuclear reprogramming in somatic cell nuclear transfer?

BioEssays

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 66-74

  Loi, Pasqualino ^a,f   Beaujean, Nathalie ^b   Khochbin, Saadi ^c,d   Fulka Jr , Josef ^e   Ptak, Grazyna ^a  

^a Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences ^*  (Italy)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^e INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL SCIENCE   (Czech Republic)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TERAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA METHYLATION; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EPIGENETICS; HETEROCHROMATIN; MEIOSIS; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; SOMATIC CELL; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPERMATID; SPERMATOGENESIS; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 38049054402     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20684     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Gurdon JB, Uehlinger V. 1966. "Fertile" intestine nuclei. Nature 210:1240-1241.
2. Willadsen SM. 1986. Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 320:63-65.
3. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810-813.
4. Meissner A, Jaenisch R. 2006. Mammalian nuclear transfer. Dev Dyn 235:2460-2469.
5. Lagutina I, et al. 2005. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in horses: effect of oocyte morphology, embryo reconstruction method and donor cell type. Reproduction 130:559-567.
6. Vajta G. 2007. Handmade cloning: the future way of nuclear transfer? Trends In Biotechnology 25:250-253.
7. Tian XC, et al. 2007. Nuclear reprogramming by somatic cell nuclear transfer - the cattle story. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 64:327-339.
8. Tsunoda Y, Kato Y. 2002. Recent progress and problems in animal cloning. Differentiation 69:158-161.
9. Rideout WM III, Eggan K, Jaenisch R. 2001. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science 293:1093-1098.
10. Latham KE. 2005. Early and delayed aspects of nuclear reprogramming during cloning. Biol Cell 97:119-132.
11. Loi P, et al. 2006. Placental abnormalities associated with post-natal mortality in sheep somatic cell clones. Theriogenology 65:1110-1121.
12. Ogura A, et al. 2002. Phenotypic effects of somatic cell cloning in the mouse. Cloning Stem Cells 4:397-405.
13. Tamashiro KL, et al. 2003. Phenotype of cloned mice: development, behaviour, and physiology. Exp Biol Med 228:1193-1200.
14. Gurdon JB. 2006. From nuclear transfer to nuclear reprogramming: the reversal of cell differentiation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:1-22.
15. Bousquet D, Blondin P. 2004. Potential uses of cloning in breeding schemes: dairy cattle. Cloning Stem Cells 6:190-197.
16. Yang X, et al. 2007. Risk assessment of meat and milk from cloned animals. Nat Biotechnol 25:77-83.
17. Loi P, et al. 2001. Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross-species nuclear transfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nat Biotechnol 19:962-964.
18. Holt WV, et al. 2004. Wildlife conservation and reproductive cloning. Reproduction 127:317-324.
19. Robl JM, Wang Z, Kasinathan P, Kuroiwa Y. 2007. Transgenic animal production and animal biotechnology. Theriogenology 67:127-133.
20. Niemann H, Kues WA. 2007. Transgenic farm animals: an update. Reprod Fertil Dev 19:762-770.
21. Prather RS, Hawley RJ, Carter DB, Lai L, Greenstein JL. 2002. Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture. Theriogenology 59:115-123.
22. Trounson AO. 2006. Future and applications of cloning. Methods Mol Biol 348:319-332.
23. Pomerantz J, Blau HM. 2004. Nuclear reprogramming: a key to stem cell function in regenerative medicine. Nat Cell Biol 6:810-816.
24. Rideout WM 3rd, Hochedlinger K, Kyba M, Daley GQ, Jaenisch R. 2002. Correction of a genetic defect by nuclear transplantation and combined cell and gene therapy. Cell 109:17-27.
25. Tada M, Takahama Y, Abe K, Nakatsuji N, Tada T. 2001. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Curr Biol 11:1553-1558.
26. Taranger CK, et al. 2005. Induction of dedifferentiation, genome wide transcriptional programming, and epigenetic reprogramming by extracts of carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 16:5719-5735.
27. Hakelien AM, Kuntziger T, Gaustad KG, Marstad A, Collas P. 2006. In vitro reprogramming of nuclei and cells. Methods Mol Biol 348:259-368.
28. Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R. 2006. Nuclear reprogramming and pluripotency. Nature 441:1061-1067.
29. Hurlbut WB. 2005. Altered nuclear transfer: a way forward for embryonic stem cell research. Stem Cell Rev 1:293-300.
30. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. 2006. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663-676.
31. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. 2007. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448:313-317.
32. Wernig M, et al. 2007. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448:318-324.
33. Rossant J. 2007. Stem cells: the magic brew. Nature 448:260-262.
34. Wells DN. 2003. Cloning in livestock agriculture. Reprod Suppl 61:131-150.
35. Robl JM, Wang Z, Kasinathan P, Kuroiwa Y. 2007. Transgenic animal production and animal biotechnology. Theriogenology 67:127-133.
36. Campbell KH. 1999. Nuclear equivalence, nuclear transfer, and the cell cycle. Cloning 1:3-15.
37. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. 1998. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394:369-374.
38. 2+-calmodulin, and cyclic AMP. In: Boynton AL, Leffert HL, editors. Control of Animal Cell Proliferation, vol 1. London: Academic Press. pp 331-365.
39. Martínez-Balbás MA, Dey A, Rabindran SK, Ozato K, Wu C. 1995. Displacement of sequence-specific transcription factors from mitotic chromatin. Cell 83:29-38.
40. Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Yanagimachi R, Mombaerts P. 1999. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14984-14989.
41. Cibelli JB, et al. 1988. Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 280:1256-1258.
42. Campbell KH, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, Wilmut I. 1996. Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod 1:40-46.
43. Sgaramella V, Zinder ND. 1998. Dolly confirmation. Science 279:635, 637-638.
44. Inoue K, et al. 2007. Differential developmental ability of embryos cloned from tissue-specific stem cells. Stem Cells [Epub ahead of print] PMID:1725551.
45. Mizutani E, et al. 2006. Developmental ability of cloned embryos from neural stem cells. Reproduction 132:849-857.
46. Inoue K, et al. 2006. Inefficient reprogramming of the hematopoietic stem cell genome following nuclear transfer. J Cell Sci 119:1985-1991.
47. Oback B, Wells DN. 2006. Donor cell differentiation, reprogramming, and cloning efficiency: Elusive or illusive correlation? Mol Reprod Dev 74:646-654.
48. Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R. 2002. Monoclonal mice generated by nuclear transfer from mature B and T donor cells. Nature 415:1035-1038.
49. Eggan K, et al. 2004. Mice cloned from olfactory sensory neurons. Nature 428:44-49.
50. Inoue K, et al. 2005. Generation of cloned mice by direct nuclear transfer from natural killer T cells. Curr Biol 15:1114-1148.
51. rd, et al. 2000. Generation of mice from wild-type and targeted ES cells by nuclear cloning. Nat Genet 24:109-110.
52. Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Yanagimachi R, Mombaerts P. 1999. Mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14984-14989.
53. Kohda T, et al. 2005. Variation in gene expression and aberrantly regulated chromosome regions in cloned mice. Biol Reprod 73:1302-1311.
54. Cezar GG, et al. 2003. Genome-wide epigenetic alterations in cloned bovine fetuses. Biol Reprod 68:1009-1014.
55. Kremenskoy M, et al. 2006. DNA methylation profiles of donor nuclei cells and tissues of cloned bovine fetuses. J Reprod Dev 52:259-266.
56. Ng RK, Gurdon JB. 2005. Epigenetic memory of active gene transcription is inherited through somatic cell nuclear transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1957-1962.
57. Boiani M, Eckardt S, Scholer HR, McLaughlin KJ. 2002. Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. Genes Dev 16:1209-1219.
58. Jouneau A, et al. 2006. Developmental abnormalities of NT mouse embryos appear early after implantation. Development 133:1597-1607.
59. Wuensch A, et al. 2007. Quantitative monitoring of pluripotency gene activation after somatic cloning in cattle. Biol Reprod 76:983-991.
60. Smith C, et al. 2007. Simultaneous gene quantitation of multiple genes in individual bovine nuclear transfer blastocysts. Reproduction 133:231-242.
61. Smith SL, et al. 2005. Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17582-17587.
62. Somers J, et al. 2006. Gene expression profiling of individual bovine nuclear transfer blastocysts. Reproduction 131:1073-1084.
63. Haaf T. 2006. Methylation dynamics in the early mammalian embryo implications of genome reprogramming defects for development. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 310:13-22.
64. Kang YK, et al. 2001. Typical demethylation events in cloned pig embryos. Clues on species-specific differences in epigenetic reprogramming of a cloned donor genome. J Biol Chem.276:39980-39984.
65. Bird A. 2002. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 16:6-21.
66. Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T. 2000. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 403:501-502.
67. Howell CY, et al. 2001. Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene. Cell 104:829-838.
68. Santos F, Peters AH, Otte AP, Reik W, Dean W. 2005. Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev Biol 280:225-236.
69. Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. 2005. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet 14:R47-R58.
70. Reik W, et al. 2003. Epigenetic asymmetry in the mammalian zygote and early embryo: relationship to lineage commitment? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1403-1409.
71. Fulka H, Mrazek M, Tepla O, Fulka J Jr. 2004. DNA methylation pattern in human zygotes and developing embryos. Reproduction 128:703-708.
72. Santos F, et al. 2003. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. Curr Biol 13:1116-1121.
73. Beaujean N, et al. 2004. Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 71:185-193.
74. Shi W, Dirim F, Wolf E, Zakhartchenko V, Haaf T. 2004. Methylation reprogramming and chromosomal aneuploidy in in vivo fertilized and cloned rabbit preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 71:340-347.
75. Beaujean N, et al. 2004. The effect of interspecific oocytes on demethylation of sperm DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7636-7640.
76. Enright BP, Kubota C, Yang X, Tian XC. 2003. Epigenetic characteristics and development of embryos cloned from donor cells treated by trichostatin A or 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Biol Reprod 69:896-901.
77. Rybouchkin A, Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. 2006. Role of histone acetylation in reprogramming of somatic nuclei following nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 74:1083-1089.
78. Kiziltepe T, et al. 2007. 5-Azacytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, induces ATR-mediated DNA double-strand break responses, apoptosis, and synergistic cytotoxicity with doxorubicin and bortezomib against multiple myeloma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 6:1718-1728.
79. Kishigami S. 2006. Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340:183-189.
80. Kishigami S, et al. 2007. Successful mouse cloning of an outbred strain by trichostatin A treatment after somatic nuclear transfer. J Reprod Dev 53:165-170.
81. Wakayama T. Production of cloned mice and ES cells from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer: how to improve cloning efficiency? J Reprod Dev. 2007 Feb; 53(1):13-26.
82. Simonsson S, Gurdon J. 2004. DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nat Cell Biol 6:984-990.
83. Byrne JA, Simonsson S, Western PS, Gurdon JB. 2003. Nuclei of adult mammalian somatic cells are directly reprogrammed to oct-4 stem cell gene expression by amphibian oocytes. Curr Biol 13:1206-1213.
84. Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. 2005. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet 14:R47-58.
85. Barton SC, et al. 2001. Genome-wide methylation patterns in normal and uniparental early mouse embryos. Hum Mol Genet 10:2983-2987.
86. Haaf T. 2001. The battle of the sexes after fertilization: behaviour of paternal and maternal chromosomes in the early mammalian embryo. Chromosome Res 9:263-271.
87. Kaufman MH, Barton SC, Surani MA. 1977. Normal postimplantation development of mouse parthenogenetic embryos to the forelimb bud stage. Nature 265:53-55.
88. Kaufman MH, Sachs L. 1976. Complete preimplantation development in culture of parthenogenetic mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 35:179-190.
89. Loi P, Ledda S, Fulka J Jr, Cappai P, Moor RM. 1998. Development of parthenogenetic and cloned ovine embryos: effect of activation protocols. Biol Reprod 58:1177-1187.
90. McGrath J, Solter D. 1984. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37:179 183.
91. van der Heijden GW, et al. 2005. Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech Dev 122:1008-1022.
92. Yoshida N, Brahmajosyula M, Shoji S, Amanai M, Perry AC. 2007. Epigenetic discrimination by mouse metaphase II oocytes mediates asymmetric chromatin remodeling independently of meiotic exit. Dev Biol 301:464-477.
93. Mikkelsen TS, et al. 2007. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448:553-560.
94. Rousseaux S, et al. 2005. Establishment of male-specific epigenetic information. Gene 345:139-153.
95. Govin J, et al. 2007. Pericentric heterochromatin reprogramming by new histone variants during mouse spermiogenesis. J Cell Biol 176:283-294.
96. Pivot-Pajot C, et al. 2003. Acetylation-dependent chromatin reorganization by BRDT, atestis-specific bromodomain-containing protein. Mol Cell Biol 23:5354-5365.
97. Loi P, et al. 2002. Nuclei of nonviable ovine somatic cells develop into lambs after nuclear transplantation. Biol Reprod 67:126-132.
98. Lai CM, Lai YK, Rakoczy PE. 2002. Adenovirus and adeno-associated virus vectors. DNA Cell Biol 21:895-913.
99. Chung YG, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS, Latham KE. 2002. Nuclear-cytoplasmic "tug of war" during cloning: effects of somatic cell nuclei on culture medium preferences of preimplantation cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 66:1178-1184.