The effects of listening while reading and repeated reading on the reading fluency of adult learners

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 196-205

  Winn, Beth D ^a   Skinner, Christopher H ^a   Oliver, Renee ^b   Hale, Andrea D ^c   Ziegler, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37849185400     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/JAAL.50.3.4     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Beck, M.D., & Rogers, B.G. (1998). [Review of the tests of adult basic education, forms 7 and 8]. The Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Retrieved February 22, 2005, from EBSCOHost Mental Measurements Yearbook database.
2. Billington, E.J., Skinner, C.H., & Cruchon, N.M. (2004). Improving sixth-grade students' perceptions of high-effort assignments by assigning more work: Interaction of additive interspersal and assignment effort on assignment choice. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 477-490.
3. Billington, E.J., Skinner, C.H., Hutchins, H., & Malone, J.C. (2004). Varying problem effort and choice: Using the interspersal technique to influence choice towards more effortful assignments. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 193-207.
4. Breznitz, Z. (1987). Increasing first graders' reading accuracy and comprehension by accelerating their reading rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 236-242.
5. Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.J. (2002), A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
6. Chomsky, C. (1978). When you still can't read in third grade: After decoding, what? In S.J. Samuels (Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 13-30). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
8. Cunningham, J.W. (1979). An automatic pilot for decoding. The Reading Teacher, 32, 420-424.
9. Daly, E.J., Chafouleas, S., & Skinner, C.H. (2004). Interventions for reading problems: Designing and evaluating effective strategies. New York: Guilford.
10. Daly, E.J., III, & Martens, B.K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459-469.
11. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 19, 450-466.
12. Dowhower, S.L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389-406.
13. Freeland, J.T., Skinner, C.H., Jackson, B., McDaniel, C.E., & Smith, S. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 415-429.
14. Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
15. Greenberg, D., Ehri, L., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262-275.
16. Haring, N.G., & Eaton, M.D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N.G. Haring, T.C. Lovitt, M.D. Eaton, & C.L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23-40). Columbus OH: Merrill.
17. Heckelman, R.G. (1969). A neurological-impress method of remedial-reading instruction. Academic Therapy, 5, 277-282.
18. Kruidenier, J.R. (2002). Research-based principles for adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy, Partnership for Reading.
19. Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
20. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
21. Lasater, B., & Elliott, B. (2004). Profiles of the adult education target population. Washington, DC: Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved February 20, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/census1.pdf
22. Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and when to do it. In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
23. McDaniel, C.E., Watson, T.S., Freeland, J.T., Smith, S.L., Jackson, B., & Skinner, C.H. (2001, May). Comparing silent repeated reading and teacher previewing using silent reading comprehension rate. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Applied Behavior Analysis, New Orleans, LA.
24. Meyer, V. (1982). Prime-O-Tec: A successful strategy for adult disabled readers. Journal of Reading, 25, 512-515.
25. Mudd, N. (1987). Strategies used in the early stages of learning to read: A comparison of children and adults. Educational Research, 29(2), 83-99.
26. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4765). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
27. Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2005). State-administered adult education program: Program year 2002-2003 enrollment. Retrieved January 18, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/datatables/ 2002-2003enroll.xls
28. O'Shea, L.J., Sindelar, P.T., & O'Shea, D.J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 129-142.
29. Perfetti, C. (1977). Language comprehension and fast decoding: Some psycholinguistic perquisites for skilled reading comprehension. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Cognition, curriculum, and comprehension (pp. 20-41). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
30. Perfetti, C.A. (1992). The representation problems in reading acquisition, In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Rose, T.L. (1984a). The effects of two pre-practice procedures on oral reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 544-548.
32. Rose, T.L. (1984b). The effects of previewing on retarded learners' oral reading. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 49-53.
33. Rose, T.L. (1984c). Effects of previewing on oral reading of mainstreamed behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 33-39.
34. Sabatini, J.P. (2002). Efficiency in word reading of adults: Ability group comparisons. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 267-298.
35. Samuels, S.J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
36. Shapiro, E.S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
37. Skinner, C.H. (1998). Preventing academic skill deficits. In T.S. Watson & P.M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 61-82). New York: Plenum Press.
38. Skinner, C.H., Adamson, K.L., Woodward, J.R., Jackson, R.R., Atchison, L.A., & Mims, J.W. (1993), A comparison of fast rate, slow rate, and silent previewing interventions on reading performance. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 674-681.
39. Skinner, C.H., Cooper, L., & Cole, C.L (1997). The effects of oral presentation previewing rates on reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 331-333.
40. Skinner, C.H., Logan, P., Robinson, S.L., & Robinson, D.H. (1997). Myths and realities of modeling as a reading intervention: Beyond acquisition. School Psychology Review, 26, 437-447.
41. Skinner, C.H., Pappas, D.N., & Davis, K.A. (2005). Enhancing academic engagement: Providing opportunities for responding and influencing students to choose to respond. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 389-403.
42. Skinner, C.H., Robinson, S.L., Morse, D.T., O'Neal, M.R., & Jackson, R.R. (1998). Effects of models' reading rate on generalized reading performance in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 13(2), 54-64.
43. Skinner, C.H., Satcher, J.F., Bamberg, H.W., Waters-Kemp, P.A., Brandt, R., & Robinson, D.H. (1995). Effects of listening previewing across passages written at instructional and frustrational reading levels. Journal of Balanced Reading Instruction, 2(1), 16-26.
44. Skinner, C.H., & Shapiro, E.S. (1989). A comparison of a taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123-133.
45. Snow, C.E., & Strucker, J. (1999). Lessons from preventing reading difficulties in young children for adult learning and literacy: A project of the National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 25-73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Spargo, E. (1989). Timed readings in literature. Providence, RI: Jamestown Publishers.
47. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
48. Sterling, H.E., Robinson, S.L., & Skinner, C.H. (1997). The effects of two taped-words interventions on sight-word reading in students with mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 25-32.
49. Strong, A.C., Wehby, J.H., Falk, K.B., & Lane, K.L. (2004). The impact of a structured reading curriculum and repeated reading on the performance of junior high students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 33, 561-581.
50. Tractenberg, R.E. (2002). Exploring hypotheses about phonological awareness, memory, and reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 407-424.
51. Ziegler, M., Durant, C., & Mincey, R. (2003). Engagement: Precursor to learning for welfare recipients in adult basic education. Perspectives: The New York Journal of Adult Learning, 1(2), 18-28.