How a vicinal layer of solvent modulates the dynamics of proteins

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 79-89

  Atilgan, Canan ^a   Aykut, Ayse Ozlem ^a   Atilgan, Ali Rana ^a  

^a SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCEROL; SOLVENT; WATER;

ARTICLE; ENTROPY; LOW TEMPERATURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEUTRON SCATTERING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMODYNAMICS; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 37749048444     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116426     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Frauenfelder, H. 2002. Proteins: paradigms of complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2479-2480.
2. Fenimore, P. W., H. Frauenfelder, B. H. McMahon, and R. D. Young. 2004. Bulk solvent and hydration-shell fluctuations, similar to alphaand beta-fluctuations in glasses, control protein motions and functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:14408-14413.
3. Engler, N., A. Ostermann, N. Niimura, and F. G. Parak. 2003. Hydrogen atoms in proteins: positions and dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:10243-10248.
4. Tarek, M., and D. J. Tobias. 2002. Role of protein-water hydrogen bond dynamics in the protein dynamical transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:138101.
5. Zaccai, G. 2000. How soft is a protein? A protein dynamics force constant measured by neutron scattering. Science. 288:1604-1607.
6. Dirama, T. E., G. A. Carri, and A. P. Sokolov. 2005. Coupling between lyzosyme and glycerol dynamics: microscopic insights from molecular-dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 122:244910.
7. Dirama, T. E., J. E. Curtis, G.A. Carri, and A. P. Sokolov. 2006. Coupling between lyzosyme and trehalose dynamics: microscopic insights from molecular-dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 124:034901.
8. Cornicchi, E., M. Marconi, G. Onori, and A. Paciaroni. 2006. Controlling the protein dynamical transition with sugar-based bioprotectant matrices: a neutron scattering study. Biophys. J. 91:289-297.
9. Paciaroni, A., S. Cinelli, and G. Onori. 2002. Effect of environment on the protein dynamical transition: a neutron scattering study. Biophys. J. 83:1157-1164.
10. Baysal, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2002. Relaxation kinetics and the glassiness of proteins: the case of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biophys. J. 83:699-705.
11. Baysal, C., and A. R. Atilgan. 2005. Relaxation kinetics and the glassiness of native proteins: coupling of timescales. Biophys. J. 88:1570-1576.
12. Ansari, A., J. Berendzen, S. F. Bowne, H. Frauenfelder, I. E. T. Iben, T. B. Sauke, E. Shyamsunder, and R. D. Young. 1985. Protein states and proteinquakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:5000-5004.
13. Bizzarri, A. R., and S. Cannistraro. 2002. Molecular dynamics of water at the protein-solvent interface. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:6617-6633.
14. Doster, W., A. Bachleitner, R. Dunau, M. Hiebl, and E. Loscher. 1986. Thermal properties of water in myoglobin crystals and solutions at subzero temperatures. Biophys. J. 50:213-219.
15. Barron, L. D., L. Hecht, and G. Wilson. 1997. The lubricant of life: a proposal that solvent water promotes extremely fast conformational fluctuations in mobile heteropolypeptide structure. Biochemistry. 36:13143-13147.
16. Pal, S. K., J. Peon, and A. H. Zewail. 2002. Biological water at the protein surface: dynamical solvation probed directly with femtosecond resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:1763-1768.
17. Dastidar, S. G., and C. Mukhopadhyay. 2003. Structure, dynamics, and energetics of water at the surface of a small globular protein: a molecular dynamics simulation. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 68:021921.
18. Vitkup, D., D. Ringe, G. A. Petsko, and M. Karplus. 2000. Solvent mobility and the protein 'glass' transition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:34-38.
19. Hagen, S. J., and J. Hofrichter. 1995. Protein reaction kinetics in a room-temperature glass. Science. 269:959-962.
20. Ansari, A., C. M. Jones, E. R. Henry, J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 1992. The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational changes. Science. 256:1796-1798.
21. Reat, V., R. Dunn, F. Michel, J. L. Finney, R. M. Daniel, and J. C. Smith. 2000. Solvent dependence of dynamic transitions in protein solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:9961-9966.
22. Samuni, U., D. Dantsker, C. J. Roche, and J. M. Friedman. 2007. Ligand recombination and a hierarchy of solvent slaved dynamics: the origin of kinetic phases in hemeproteins. Gene. 398:234-248.
23. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
24. Sandgren, M., A. Shaw, T. H. Ropp, S. Wu, R. Bott, A. D. Cameron, J. Starrhlberg, C. Mitchinson, and T. A. Jones. 2001. The X-ray crystal structure of the Trichoderma reesei family 12 endoglucanase 3, Cel12A, at 1.9 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 308:295-310.
25. J. C. Phillips, R. Braun, W. Wang, J. Gumbart, E. Tajkhorshid, E. Villa, C. Chipot, R. D. Skeel, L. Kale, and K. Schulten. 2005. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26:1781-1802.
26. Brooks, B. R., R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus. 1983. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4:187-217.
27. Frisch, M. J., G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel., G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, et al. 2003. Gaussian 03. Gaussian, Pittsburgh PA.
28. Accelrys, Inc. 2002. Materials Studio. Accelrys, San Diego, CA.
29. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD - visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.
30. Leach, A. R. 1996. Molecular Modelling Principles and Applications. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
31. Stillinger, F. H., P. G. Debenedetti, and T. M. Truskett. 2001. The Kauzmann paradox revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:11809-11816.
32. Bicout, D. J., and G. Zaccai. 2001. Protein flexibility from the dynamical transition: a force constant analysis. Biophys. J. 80:1115-1123.
33. Kohlrausch, R. 1974. Theorie des elektrischen Rückstandes in der Leidener Flasche. [in German]. Ann. Phys. Chem. (Leipzig). 91:179-214.
34. Williams, G., and D. C. Watts. 1970. Non-symmetrical dielectric relaxation behavior arising from a simple empirical decay function. Trans. Faraday Soc. 66:80-85.
35. Qian, H. 2000. Single-particle tracking: Brownian dynamics of viscoelastic materials. Biophys. J. 79:137-143.
36. Zaccai, G. 2003. Proteins as nano-machines: dynamics-function relations studied by neutron scattering. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 15:S1673-S1682.
37. Zhou, Y., D. Vitkup, and M. Karplus. 1999. Native proteins are surface-molten solids: application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1371-1375.
38. Okan, O. B. 2005. Glassiness and Coupling of Time Scales in Functional Proteins. MSc Thesis in Engineering and Natural Sciences. Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
39. Farnum, M., and C. Zukoski. 1999. Effect of glycerol on the interactions and solubility of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biophys. J. 76:2716-2726.
40. Dirama, T. E., G. A. Carri, and A. P. Sokolov. 2005. Role of hydrogen bonds in the fast dynamics of binary glasses of trehalose and glycerol: a molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 122:114505.
41. Baysal, C., A. R. Atilgan, B. Erman, and I. Bahar. 1996. Molecular dynamics analysis of coupling between librational motions and isomeric jumps in chain molecules. Macromolecules. 29:2510-2514.
42. Baysal, C., B. Erman, and I. Bahar. 1994. Contribution of short-range intramolecular interactions to local chain dynamics. Macromolecules. 27:3650-3657.
43. Moe, N. E., and M. D. Ediger. 1996. Molecular dynamics computer simulation of local dynamics in polyisoprene melts. Polymer (Guildf.). 37:1787-1795.
44. Baysal, C., I. Bahar, B. Erman, and L. Monnerie. 1996. Kinematics of polymer chains in dense medium. 4. Effect of backbone geometry and application to polybutadiene. Macromolecules. 29:2980-2988.