Iminosugar thioglycosides as glycosyl donors: a route to disaccharides with an iminosugar moiety

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 910-913

  Fuentes, José ^a   Al Bujuq, Nader R ^a   Angulo, Manuel ^a   Gasch, Consolación ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Glycosidations; Iminosugar disaccharides; Iminosugars; Thioglycosides

Indexed keywords

DISACCHARIDE; IMINOSUGAR; IMINOSUGAR THIOGLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVE; THIOGLYCOSIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRUG SYNTHESIS; GLYCOSIDATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 37649017844     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.11.160     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. See as examples:. Afarinkia K., and Bahar A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 12 (2005) 1239-1287
2. Lillelund V.H., Jensen H., Liang X., and Bols M. Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 515-553
3. Stutz A.E. Iminosugars as Glycosidase Inhibitors (1999), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
4. Sinnot M.L. Chem. Rev. 90 (1990) 1171-1202
5. Winchester B., and Fleet G.W.G. Glycobiology 2 (1992) 199-210
6. Giannis A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 33 (1994) 178-180
7. For a review, see:. Casiragui G., Zanardi F., Rassu G., and Spann P. Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 1677-1716
8. See as examples:. Blanco M.J., and Sardina F.J. J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 3411-3416
9. Sayago F.J., Fuentes J., Angulo M., Gasch C., and Pradera M.A. Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 4695-4702
10. Fuentes J., Gasch C., Olano D., Pradera M.A., Repetto G., and Sayago F.J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 1743-1753
11. Chabeand L., Landais Y., and Reneaud P. Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 2587-2590
12. Li H., Bleriot Y., Chantereau C., Mallet J.M., Sollogoub M., Zhang Y., Rodríguez-García E., Vogel P., Jiménez-Barbero J., and Sinay P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2 (2004) 1492-1499
13. See as examples:. García-Aparicio V., Fernández-Alonso M.C., Angulo J., Asencio J.L., Cañada F.J., Jiménez-Barbero J., Mootoo D.R., and Cheng X. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 16 (2005) 519-527
14. Aslam T., Fuchs M.G.G., Le Formal A., and Wightman R.H. Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 3249-3252
15. Sharma G.V.M., Pendem N., Reddy K.R., Krishna P.R., Narsimulo K., and Kunwar A.C. Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2004) 8807-8810
16. Agryropoulos N.G., and Sarli V.C. Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2004) 4237-4240
17. Dondoni A., Giovanni P.P., and Marra A. Tetrahedron Lett. 41 (2000) 6195-6199
18. Campanini L., Duréault A., and Depezay J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 37 (1996) 5095-5098
19. Barbaud C., Bols M., Lundt I., and Sierks M.R. Tetrahedron 51 (1995) 9063-9078
20. Gravier-Pelletier C., Maton W., and Le Merrer Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 8285-8288
21. Gravier-Pelletier C., Maton W., Lecourt T., and Le Merrer Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 4475-4478
22. Sawada D., Takahashi H., Shiro M., and Ikegami S. Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 2399-2403
23. For a review, see:. Garegg P.J. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 52 (1997) 179-205
24. See also:. Demchenko A.V., Pornsuriyasak P., De Meo C., and Malysheva N.N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 3069-3072
25. Crich D., and Sun S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 435-436
26. López J.C., Gómez A.M., Uriel C., and Fraser-Reid B. Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 1417-1420
27. Defaye J., and Gelas J. In: Altaur-Rahman (Ed). Studies Natural Products Chemistry Vol. 8 (1991), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
28. See as examples:. Witczak Z.J., and Boryczewski D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8 (1998) 3265-3268
29. Fitz W., Rosenthal P., and Wong C.H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 4 (1996) 1349-1353
30. Fuentes J., Sayago F.J., Illangua J.M., Gasch C., Angulo M., and Pradera M.A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 (2004) 603-615 and 2004, 15, 3783-3789
31. Pradera M.A., Sayago F.J., Illangua J.M., Gasch C., and Fuentes J. Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 6605-6608
32. Fuentes J., Olano D., and Pradera M.A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 8 (1997) 3443-3456
33. Fuentes, J.; Al Bujuq, N. R.; Pradera, M. A.; Gasch, C. Unpublished results communicated to the 'Eighth Tetrahedron Symposium' Berlin, Germany, June 2007, Communication P343.
34. 8, 532.2910.
35. For the molecular modelling calculations the force field TRIPOS was used as implemented in Sybyl 7.3 (Tripos Inc.). The starting structure was built with a ring puckering corresponding to a skewed boat conformation, as it was the only ring conformation in qualitative agreement with the experimental J-couplings, and, at the same time, showing the largest number of bulky exocyclic groups in the most stable equatorial or isoclinal orientations. The exocyclic torsions were optimized by determining the energy minimum in torsional energy maps with 60° increments (gridsearch module in Sybyl). Gasteiger-Hückel atomic partial charges were used and the energy minimization steps in all the calculations consisted in 1000 conjugated-gradients maximum iterations, an energy gradient limit of 0.01 Kcal/mol A, using a distance-dependent dielectric constant of 1·r, and a non-bonded cutoff of 8 A. Energy minimization led to significantly improved agreement between experimental and theoretical J-couplings. Theoretical distances were measured on the energy minimum, and the J-couplings were obtained using the Haasnoot-Altona empirical equation (Haasnoot, C. A. G.; De Leeuw, F. A. A. M.; Altona, C. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 2783-2792). Any molecular model with an inverted configuration at C-2 was unable to predict the set of exclusive NOEs described in the discussion of results.
36. Compound 10 was a commercial product. For the preparation of 11, see:. Bernotas R.C., Pezzone M.A., and Ganem B. Carbohydr. Res. 167 (1987) 305-311
37. and for the preparation of 12, see:. Roën A., Padrón J.I., and Vázquez J.T. J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 4615-4630
38. Lönn H. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 6 (1987) 301-306
39. Krog-Jensen C., and Oscarson S. J. Org. Chem. 61 (1996) 1234-1238
40. Ito Y., and Ogawa T. Carbohydr. Res. 202 (1990) 165-175
41. 13Na, 714.3102.