18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta

Journal of Molecular Evolution

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 552-559

  Mackey, L Y ^a   Winnepenninckx, B ^b   De Wachter, R ^b   Backeljau, T ^c   Emschermann, P ^d   Garey, J R ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

18S rRNA; Brachiopoda; Ectoprocta; Entoprocta; Hirudinida; Lophophorata; Molecular phylogeny; Oligochaeta; Phoronida; Polychaeta

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME RNA;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; MOLLUSC; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POLYCHAETA; RNA SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALS; BRYOZOA; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, PLANT; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0029889447     PISSN: 00222844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02352285     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1995) Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene, New York
2. Bej AK, Mahbubani MH, Atlas RM (1991) Amplifications of nucleic acids by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other methods and their applications. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 26:301-334
3. Bergström J (1986) Metazoan evolution - a new model. Zool Scr 15: 189-200
4. Bevan IS, Rapley R, Walker MR (1992) Sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA. PCR Methods Appl 1:222-228
5. Bremer K (1988) The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 2:795-803
6. Brusca RC, Brusca GJ (1990) Invertebrates. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
7. Clark AH (1921) A new classification of animals. Bull Inst Oceanogr Monaco 400: 1-24
8. Clark RB (1969) Systematics and phylogeny: Annelida, Echiura, Sipuncula. In: Florkin M, and Scheer BT (eds) Chemical zoology, vol IV: Annelida, Echiura and Sipuncula. Academic Press, New York, pp 1-68
9. Cori C (1936) Kamptozoa. In: Bronn HG (ed) Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs 4, II. Abt, 4. Buch Akad Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, pp 1-119
10. De Rijk P, De Wachter R (1993) DCSE, an interactive tool for sequence alignment and secondary structure research. Comput Appl Biosci 9:735-740
11. Donoghue MJ, Olmstead RG, Smith JF, Palmer JD (1992) Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on RbcL sequences. Ann MO Bot Gard 79:333-345
12. Eckert KA, Kunkel TA (1991) DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. PCR Methods Appl 1:17-24
13. Eernisse DJ, Albert JS, Anderson FE (1992) Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: a phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst Biol 41:305-330
14. Emig C (1984) On the origin of the Lophophorata. Z Zool Syst Evolutforsch 22:91-94
15. Emschermann P (1982) Les Kamptozoaires. Etat actuel de nos connaissances sur leur anatomie, leur développement, leur biologie et leur position phylogénétique. Bull Soc Zool Fr 107:317-344
16. Emschermann P (1985) Cladus Kamptozoa. In: Siewing R (ed) Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Band II: Systematik. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 576-586
17. Emschermann P (1987) A circulating water tank for culturing sessile or hemisessile aquatic organisms in a continuous water current. Arch Hydrobiol 108:425-438
18. Felsenstein J (1988) Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet 22:521-565
19. Field KG, Olsen GJ, Lane DJ, Giovannoni SJ, Ghiselin MT, Raff EC, Pace NR, Raff RA (1988) Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239:748-753
20. Ghiselen MT (1988) The origin of molluscs in the light of molecular evidence. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 66-95
21. Gustus RM, Cloney RA (1972) Ultrastructural similarities between setae of brachiopods and polychaetes. Acta Zool 53:229-233
22. Gutmann WF (1978) Brachiopods: biomechanical interdependencies governing their origin and phylogeny. Science 100:890-893
23. Halanych KM, Bacheller JD, Aguinaldo AMA, Liva SM, Hillis DM, Lake JA (1995) Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267:1641-1643
24. Hempstead PG, Regular SC, Ball IR (1990) A method for the preparation of high-molecular-weight DNA from marine and freshwater triclads. DNA Cell Biol 9:57
25. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182-192
26. Hyman LH (1951) The invertebrates: Acanthocephala, Aschelminthes and Entoprocta - the pseudocoelomate Bilateria. McGraw-Hill, New York
27. Hyman LH (1959) The invertebrates: smaller coelomate groups: Chaetognatha, Hemichordata, Pogonophora, Phoronida, Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda, Sipunculida. McGraw-Hill, New York
28. Jägersten G (1972) Evolution of the metazoan life cycle. Academic Press, New York
29. Jeuniaux C (1982) La chitine dans le règne animal. Bull Soc Zool FR 107:363-386
30. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111-120
31. Kumar S (1995) PHYLTEST: phylogeny hypothesis testing using the minimum evolution method. Pennsylvania State University, State College
32. Lorenzen S (1985) Phylogenetic aspects of pseudocoelomate evolution. In: Conway Morris S, George JD, Gibson R, Platt HM (eds) The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 210-223
33. Nielsen C (1977) The relationships of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta and Phoronida. Am Zool 17:149-150
34. Nielsen C (1994) Larval and adult characters in animal phylogeny. Am Zool 34:492-501
35. Nielsen C (1995) Animal evolution, interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford
36. Olsen GJ, Woese CR (1993) Ribosomal RNA: a key to phylogeny. FASEB J 7:113-123
37. Rzhetsky A, Kumar S, Nei M (1995) Four-cluster analysis: a simple method to test phylogenetic hypotheses. Mol Biol Evol 12:163-167
38. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425
39. Siewing R (1976) Probleme und neuere Erkenntnisse in der Gross-Systematik der Wirbellosen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges Stuttgart 1976: 59-83
40. Siewing R (1980) Das Archicoelomatenkonzept. Zool Jb Syst 103:439-82
41. Specht A (1988) Chaetae. In: Westheide W, Hermans CO. The ultrastructure of the Polychaeta: Microfauna Marina, vol. 4 pp 45-59
42. Swofford DL (1993) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign
43. Valentine JW (1973) Coelomate superphyla. Syst Zool 22:97-102
44. Van de Peer Y, Neefs JM, De Wachter R (1990) Small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences, evolutionary relationships among different life forms, and mitochondrial origins. J Mol Evol 30:463-476
45. Van de Peer Y, De Wachter R (1993) TRECON: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees. Comput Appl Biosci 9:177-182
46. Van de Peer Y, Van den Broeck I, De Rijk R, De Wachter R (1994) Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 22:3488-3494
47. van der Auwera G, Chapelle S, De Wachter R (1994) Structure of the large ribosomal subunit RNA of Phytophtora megasperma, and phylogeny of Oomycetes. FEBS Lett 338:133-136
48. von Salvini-Plawen, L (1982) A paedomorphic origin of the oligomerous animals? Zool Scr 11:77-81
49. Willmer P (1990) Invertebrate relationships. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
50. Wilmotte A, Van de Peer Y, Goris A, Chapelle S, De Baere R, Nelissen B, Neefs JM, Hennebert G, De Wachter R (1993) Evolutionary relationships among higher Fungi inferred from small ribosomal subunit RNA sequence analysis. Syst Appl Microbiol 16:436-444
51. Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R (1993) Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet 9:407
52. Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R (1994) Small ribosomal subunit RNA and the phylogeny of Mollusca. Nautilus Suppl 2:98-110
53. Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, Mackey LY, Brooks JM, De Wachter R, Kumar S, Garey JR (1995) 18S rRNA data indicate that the aschelminthes are polyphyletic in origin and consist of at least three distinct clades. Mol Biol Evol 12:1132-1137
54. Zimmer RL (1973) Morphological and developmental affinities of the lophophorates. In: Larwood GP (ed) Living and fossil Bryozoa. Academic Press, London, pp 593-599