Entangled associative structures and context

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-07-08, Issue , 2007, Pages 98-105

  Nelson, Douglas L ^a   McEvoy, Cathy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTANGLED ASSOCIATIVE STRUCTURES; KNOWLEDGE INTERACTION; STATE CONTEXT PROPERTY (SCOP);

CONFORMAL MAPPING; GENES; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; QUANTUM THEORY;

ASSOCIATIVE PROCESSING;

EID: 37349010658     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Aerts, D. 1985a. The Physical Origin of the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. In G. Tarozzi and A van der Merwe (Eds.), Open Questions in Quantum Physics: Invited Papers on the Foundations of Microphysics, 33-50. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
2. Aerts, D. 1985b. The Physical Origin of the ERP Paradox and How to Violate Bell Inequalities by Macroscopic Systems. In P. Lathi and P. Mittelstaedt (Eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: 50 years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Gedankenexperiment, 305-320. Singapore: World Scientific.
3. Aerts, D. and Gabora, L. 2005a. A State-Context-Property Model of Concepts and their Combinations I: The Structure of the Sets of Contexts and Properties. Kybernetes 34(1&2): 167-191.
4. Aerts, D. and Gabora, L. 2005b. A State-Context-Property Model of Concepts and their Combinations II: A Hubert Space Representation. Kybernetes 34(1&2): 192-221.
5. Bruza, P. D., and Cole, R. J. 2005. Quantum Logic of Semantic Space: An Exploratory Investigation of Context Effects in Practical Reasoning. In S. Artemov, H. Barringer, A. S. d'Avila Garcez, L. C. Lamb and J. Woods (Eds.) We Will Show Them: Essays in Honor of Dov Gabbay, 339-361. College Publications.
6. Collins, A. M., and Loftus, E. F. 1975. A SpreadingActivation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review 82(6): 407-428.
7. Gabora, L. and Aerts, D. 2002. Contextualizing Concepts Using a Mathematical Generalization of the Quantum Formalism. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14(4): 327-358.
8. Gee, N. R., Nelson, D. L., and Krawczyk, D. 1999. Is the Concreteness Effect a Result of Underlying Network InterConnectivity? Journal of Memory and Language 40(4): 479-497.
9. Hughes, R. I. G. 1989. The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Kintsch, W. 1988. The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model. Psychological Review 95(2): 163-182.
11. Nelson, D.L., Bennett, D.J., Gee, N.R., Schreiber, T.A., and McKinney, V.M. 1993. Implicit Memory: Effects of Network Size and Interconnectivity on Cued Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(4): 747-764.
12. Nelson, D.L., Bennett, D.J., and Leibert, T. 1997. One Step is Not Enough: Making Better Use of Association Norms to Predict Cued Recall. Memory & Cognition 25(6): 785-796.
13. Nelson, D. L., Gee, N. R., and Schreiber, T. A. 1992. Sentence Encoding and Implicitly Activated Memories. Memory & Cognition 20(6): 643-654.
14. Nelson, D. L., and Goodmon, L.B. 2002. Experiencing a Word can Prime its Accessibility and its Associative Connections to Related Words. Memory & Cognition 30(3): 380-398.
15. Nelson, D. L., and Goodmon, L.B. 2003. Disrupting Attention: The Need for Retrieval Cues in Working Memory Theories. Memory & Cognition 31(1): 65-76.
16. Nelson, D. L., Goodmon. L. B., and Ceo, D. in press. How Does Delayed Testing Reduce Effects of Implicit Memory: Context Infusion or Cuing with Context? Memory & Cognition.
17. Nelson, D.L., and McEvoy, C.L. 1979. Encoding Context and Set Size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5(3): 292-314.
18. Nelson, D. L., and McEvoy, C. L. 2005. Implicitly Activated Memories: The Missing Links of Remembering. In C. Izawa and N. Ohta (Eds.) Learning and Memory: Advances in Theory and Applications, 177-198. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
19. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., and Dennis, S. 2000. What is Free Association and What Does it Measure? Memory & Cognition 28(6): 887-899.
20. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., and Pointer, L. 2003. Spreading Activation or Spooky Action at a Distance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29(1): 42-52.
21. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L., Janczura, G.A., and Xu, J. 1993. Implicit Memory and Inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 32(5): 667-691.
22. Nelson, D.L., McEvoy, C.L., and Schreiber, T.A. 2004. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme and Word Fragment Norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36: 408-420.
23. Nelson, D.L., McKinney, V.M., Gee, N.R., and Janczura, G.A. 1998. Interpreting the Influence of Implicitly Activated Memories on Recall and Recognition. Psychological Review 105(2): 299-324.
24. Nelson, D.L, Schreiber, T.A., and McEvoy, C.L. 1992. Processing Implicit and Explicit Representations. Psychological Review 99(2): 322-348.
25. Nelson, D. L., and Zhang, N. 2000. The Ties that Bind What is Known to the Recall of What is New. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7(4): 604-617.
26. Nelson, D. L., Zhang, N., and McKinney, V. M. 2001. The Ties that Bind What is Known to the Recognition of What is New. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27(5): 1147-1159.
27. Steyvers, M., and Tannenbaum, J. B. 2005. Graph Theoretic Analyses of Semantic Networks: Small Worlds in Semantic Networks. Cognitive Science 29(1):41-78.