Examining private forest policy preferences

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 89-97

  Janota, Jessica J ^a   Broussard, Shorna R ^b  

^a Department of Natural Resources ^*  (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Policy tools; Private forestland; Public policy; Regression

Indexed keywords

POLICY TOOLS; PRIVATE FORESTLANDS;

PUBLIC POLICY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

FORESTRY;

FORESTS; USA;

EID: 37249024243     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. In: Bemelmans-Videc M.L., Rist R.C., and Vedung E. (Eds). Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (1998), Transaction Publisher, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ
2. Binder A. Restrictions on statistics imposed by method of measurement: some reality, some myth. Journal of Criminal Justice 12 (1984) 467-481
3. Borgatta E.F., and Bohrnstedt G.W. Level of measurement: once over again. Sociological Methods and Research 9 (1980) 147-160
4. Broussard S.R., and Lamprecht C. Understanding your perspectives: a survey of Indiana forestland owners. Technical Report (2006), Purdue University 48pp.
5. Butler B.J., and Leatherberry E.C. America's family forest owners. Journal of Forestry 102 7 (2004) 4-9
6. Cubbage F.W. Public regulation of private forestry. Journal of Forestry 89 12 (1991) 31-35
7. Cubbage F.W. Regulation of private forest practices. Journal of Forestry 93 6 (1995) 14-20
8. Cubbage F.W., and Siegel W.C. State and local regulation of private forests in the East. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5 (1988) 103-108
9. Davison M.L., and Sharma A.R. Parametric statistics and levels of measurement. Psychology Bulletin 104 (1988) 137-144
10. Davison M.L., and Sharma A.R. Parametric statistics and levels of measurement: factorial designs and multiple regressions. Psychology Bulletin 107 (1990) 394-400
11. Dedrick J.P., Hall T.E., Hull IV R.B., and Johnson R.B. The forest bank: an experiment in managing fragmented forests. Journal of Forestry 98 3 (2000) 22-25
12. Dillman D. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Second Edition (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, New York, USA
13. Ellefson P.V., and Cheng A.S. State forest practice programs: regulation of private forestry comes of age. Journal of Forestry 92 5 (1994) 34-37
14. Ellefson P.V., Cheng A.S., and Moulton R.J. Regulatory programs and private forestry: state government actions to direct the use and management of forest ecosystems. Society and Natural Resources 10 (1997) 195-209
15. Ellefson P.V., Cheng A.S., and Moulton R.J. State forest practice regulatory programs: an approach to implementing ecosystem management on private forest lands in the United States. Environmental Management 21 (1997) 421-432
16. Gormley W.T. Institutional policy analysis: a critical review. Policy Analysis and Management 6 (1987) 153-169
17. Gregoire T.G., and Driver B.L. Analysis of ordinal data to detect population differences. Psychology Bulletin 101 (1987) 159-165
18. Horne P. Forest owners' acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment approach. Silva Fennica 40 1 (2006) 169-178
19. Jaccard J., and Wan C.K. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression (1996), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
20. Kilgore M.A., and Blinn C.R. Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004) 111-127
21. Martus C.E., Haney Jr. H.L., and Siegel W.C. Local forest regulatory ordinances: trends in the eastern United States. Journal of Forestry 93 6 (1995) 27-31
22. McLean-Meyinsse P.E. An empirical analysis of Louisiana small farmers' involvement in the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26 (1994) 379-385
23. O'Hara T.J., and Reed A.S. Timber market development from private forests in northwestern Minnesota. Northern Journal of American Forestry 8 (1991) 153-155
24. Rasmussen J.L. Analysis of Likert-data: a reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver. Psychology Bulletin 105 (1989) 167-170
25. Roggenbuck W., and Kushman G. Riparian landowners' attitudes toward a state wild river program. Journal of Forestry 78 2 (1980) 91-93
26. Salazar D.J., and Cubbage F.W. Regulating private forestry in the West and South: two policy models. Journal of Forestry 88 1 (1990) 14-19
27. Schaaf K.A., and Broussard S.R. Private forest policy tools: a national survey exploring the American public's perceptions and support. Forest Policy and Economics 9 4 (2006) 316-334
28. Schneider A., and Ingram H. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics 52 (1990) 510-529
29. Schneider A., and Ingram H. Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review 87 (1993) 334-347
30. Smith K.B. Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Studies Journal 30 (2002) 379-395
31. Spector P.A. Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction (1992), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
32. Sullivan J., Amacher G.S., and Chapman S. Forest banking and forest landowners forgoing management rights for guaranteed financial returns. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 381-392
33. Tinbergen J. Economic Policy: Principles and Design (1956), North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
34. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Indiana's forests: 1999-2003 Part A (Resource Bulletin NC-253A). Forest Inventory and Analysis Program (2005), North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN
35. Wilson T. Critique of ordinal variables. In: Blalock H.M. (Ed). Causal Models in the Social Sciences (1971), Chicago, Aldine (Ch. 24)
36. Zhang D., and Flick W.A. Sticks, carrots, and reforestation investment. Land Economics 77 (2001) 443-456
37. Zumbo B.D., and Zimmerman D.W. Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement?. Canadian Psychology 34 (1993) 390-399