Forest banking and forest landowners forgoing management rights for guaranteed financial returns

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 381-392

  Sullivan, Jay ^a   Amacher, Gregory S ^a   Chapman, Sara ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest Bank; Forest conservation; Forest landowners; Logistic regression; Referendum survey

Indexed keywords

FOREST BANKING; FOREST CONSERVATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS; POTENTIAL RELUCTANCE;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FINANCE; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FINANCE; FORESTRY; FORESTS; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 13444254359     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Birch, T.W., 1996. Private forest landowners of the United States, 1994. Resource Bulletin NE-134. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA
2. Bliss J.C., Nepal S.K., Brooks R.T. Jr, Larsen M.D. In the mainstream: environmental attitudes of mid-south forest owners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 21:1997;37-43
3. Cameron T.A. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 15:1988;355-379
4. Dedrick J.P., Hall T.E., Hull R.B. IV, Johnson J.E. The forest bank: an experiment in managing fragmented forests. Journal of Forestry. 98:2000;22-25
5. Dennis D.F. An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics. Forest Science. 35:1989;1088-1104
6. Dillman D.A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. 1978;Wiley, New York
7. Hodge, S.S., 1993. Beliefs, attitudes, demographics and knowledge: the social dimensions of harvesting decisions made by private forest-landowners in Virginia. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University
8. Hultkrantz L. Informational efficiency of markets for stumpage. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 75:1993;234-238
9. Hyde, B., Newman D., 1991. Forest economics and policy analysis: an overview. World Bank Discussion Paper 134
10. Johannson P.O. The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits. 1987;Cambridge University Press
11. Madalla G.S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. 1983;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass. USA
12. Miles, P.D., 2001. Forest inventory mapmaker users guide. General Technical Report NC-221. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN
13. Mohai P. Men, women and the environment: an examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources. 5:1992;1-19
14. Pudney S. Modelling individual choice: the econometrics of corners, kinks and holes. 1989;Blackwell, Oxford
15. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere (SAMAB), 1996. The southern appalachian assessment social/cultural/economic technical report. Report 4 of 5. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta
16. Shaffer R.M., Meade G.S. Absentee forest landowners in Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science. 48:1997;219-223
17. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2001. The Forest Bank. Great Lakes Report GL985905-01