Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public's perceptions and support

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 316-334

  Schaaf, Kenli A ^a   Broussard, Shorna R ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Policy tools; Private forest policy; Private forests; Survey research; Timber harvesting attitudes

Indexed keywords

POLICY TOOLS; PRIVATE FOREST POLICY; PRIVATE FORESTS; SURVEY RESEARCH; TIMBER HARVESTING ATTITUDES;

PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

FORESTRY; LOGS; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 33750949385     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beach R.H., Pattanayak S.K., Yang J.C., Murray B.C., and Abt R.C. Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 261-281
2. In: Bemelmans-Videc M.L., Rist R.C., and Vedung E. (Eds). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation (1998), Transaction Publisher, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ
3. Bengston D.N. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources 76 (1994) 515-523
4. Best C., and Wayburn L.A. America's Private Forests: Status and Stewardship (2001), Island Press, Washington, DC
5. Bliss, J.C., 2001. Extension and the future of family forests: Making connections. Keynote Paper Presented at the IUFRO Forestry Extension Conference, Lorne, Australia. Available online: http://sres.anu.edu.au/associated/IUFROE2001/proceedings.pdf.
6. Bliss J.C., and Martin A.J. Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Science 35 (1989) 601-622
7. Bliss J.C., Nepal Jr. S.K., Brooks R.T., and Larsen M.D. Forestry community or granfalloon? Do forest owners share the public's values?. Journal of Forestry 92 (1994) 6-10
8. Bourke L., and Luloff A.E. Attitudes toward the management of nonindustrial private forest land. Society and Natural Resources 7 (1994) 445-457
9. Boyle K.J., and Teisl M.F. Public Preferences for Timber Harvesting on Private Forest Land Purchased for Public Ownership in Maine (1999), Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, University of Maine, Orono, ME
10. Brace P., Sims-Butler K., Arceneaux K., and Johnson M. Public opinion in the American states: new perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science 46 (2002) 173-189
11. Brockett C.D., and Gebhard L. NIPF tax incentives: do they make a difference?. Journal of Forestry 97 (1999) 16-21
12. Broussard S.R., Jones S.B., Nielsen L.A., and Flanagan C.A. Forest stewardship education: fostering positive attitudes in urban youth. Journal of Forestry 99 (2001) 37-42
13. Butler B.J., and Leatherberry E.C. America's family forest owners. Journal of Forestry 102 (2004) 4-9
14. Cubbage F.W. Public regulation of private forestry. Journal of Forestry 89 (1991) 31-35
15. Cubbage F.W., and Siegel W.C. State and local regulation of private forestry in the East. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5 (1988) 103-108
16. Cubbage F.W., Laughlin J.O., and Bullock C.S. Forest Resource Policy (1993), John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
17. Dutcher D.D., Finley J.C., Luloff A.E., and Johnson J. Landowner perceptions of protecting and establishing riparian forests: A qualitative analysis. Society and Natural Resources 17 (2004) 319-332
18. Egan A.F., and Luloff A.E. The exurbanization of America's forests: research in rural social science. Journal of Forestry 92 (2000) 26-30
19. Ellefson P.V., and Cheng A.S. State Forest Practice Programs: regulation of private forestry comes of age. Journal of Forestry 92 (1994) 34-37
20. Ellefson P.V., Cheng A.S., and Moulton R.J. Regulatory programs and private forestry: state government actions to direct the use and management of forest ecosystems. Society and Natural Resources 10 (1997) 195-209
21. Gray V., and Lowery D. Where do policy ideas come from? A study of Minnesota legislators and staffers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2000) 573-597
22. Grice J.W. Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods 6 (2001) 430-450
23. Guber D.L. The Grassroots of a Green Revolution: Polling America on the Environment (2003), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Harmon A.H., Jones S.B., and Finley J.C. Encouraging private forest stewardship through demonstration. Journal of Forestry 95 (1997) 21-25
25. Hull R.B., Robertson D.P., and Buhyoff G.J. "Boutique" forestry: new forest practices in urbanizing landscapes. Journal of Forestry 102 (2004) 14-19
26. Jones R.E., and Dunlap R.E. The social bases of environmental concern: have they changed over time?. Rural Sociology 57 (1992) 28-47
27. Kahn M.E. Demographic change and the demand for environmental regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (2002) 45-62
28. Kanagy C.L., and Nelsen H.M. Religion and environmental concern: challenging the dominant assumptions. Review of Religious Research 37 (1995) 33-45
29. Kendra A., and Hull R.B. Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. Forest Science 51 (2005) 142-154
30. Kilgore M.A., and Blinn C.R. Policy tools to encourage the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices in the United States and Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004) 111-127
31. Kluender R.A., Walkingstick T.L., and Pickett J.C. The use of forestry incentives by nonindustrial forest landowner groups: is it time for a reassessment of where we spend our tax dollars?. Natural Resources Journal 39 (1999) 799-818
32. Knetsch J.L. Assumptions, behavioral findings, and policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14 (1995) 68-78
33. Manning R., Valliere W., and Minteer B. Values, ethics, and attitudes toward National Forest management: an empirical study. Society and Natural Resources 23 (1999) 421-436
34. Martus C.E., Haney H.L., and Siegel W.C. Local forestry regulatory ordinances. Journal of Forestry 93 (1995) 27-31
35. Mohai P. Men, women, and the environment: an examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources 5 (1992) 1-19
36. Motavalli, J., 2002. The growing religious mission to protect the environment: stewards of the earth. E/The Environmental Magazine (November/December). Available online: http://www.emagazine.com/view/?924.
37. Netemeyer R.G., Bearden W.O., and Sharma S. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications (2003), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
38. Norušis M.J. SPSS 12.0 Statistical Procedures Companion (2003), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
39. Pregernig M. Values of forestry professionals and their implications for the applicability of policy instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16 (2001) 279-288
40. Pretty J., and Ward H. Social capital and the environment. World Development 29 (2001) 209-227
41. Raedeke A.H., Rikoon J.S., and Nilon C.H. Ecosystem management and landowner concern about regulations: a case study in the Missouri Ozarks. Society and Natural Resources 14 (2001) 741-759
42. Rauwald K.S., and Moore C.F. Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three countries. Environment and Behavior 34 (2002) 709-739
43. Salamon L.M. The changing tools of government action: An overview. Pp. 3-22 in Beyond Privatization: the tools of government action (1989), The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC
44. Salazar D.J., and Cubbage F.W. Regulating private forestry in the West and South. Journal of Forestry 88 (1990) 14-19
45. Sampson N., and Decoster L. Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. Journal of Forestry 98 (2000) 4-8
46. Schaaf, K.A., Ross-Davis, A.L., Broussard, S.R. in press. Exploring the dimensionality and the social bases of the public's timber harvesting attitudes. Landscape and Urban Planning.
47. Schneider A., and Ingram H. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics 52 (1990) 510-529
48. Schneider A., and Ingram H. Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review 87 (1993) 334-347
49. Smith K. Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Studies Journal 30 (2002) 379-395
50. Steel B., List P., and Shindler B. Conflicting values about federal forests: a comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society and Natural Resources 7 (1994) 137-153
51. Tarrant M.A., and Cordell H.K. Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environmental Management 30 (2002) 692-703
52. U. S. Census Bureau, 2002. U. S. Summary: 2000 (Census 2000 Profile). p. 6. In U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Available online: http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs.html.
53. Van Liere K.D., and Dunlap R.E. The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanation, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (1980) 181-197
54. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P., Williams D.R., and Jonker S. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about National Forest management. Society and Natural Resources 14 (2001) 761-776
55. Vaux H.J. The regulation of private forest practices in California: a case in policy evolution. Journal of Forest History 30 (1986) 128-134
56. Weiss G. Evaluation of policy instruments for protective forest management in Austria. Forest Policy and Economics 1 (2000) 243-255
57. Young R.A., and Reichenbach M.R. Factors influencing the timber harvest intentions of nonindustrial private forest owners. Forest Science 33 (1987) 381-393
58. Zhang D., and Flick W.A. Sticks, carrots, and reforestation investment. Land Economics 77 (2001) 443-456
59. Zobrist K., and Lippke B.R. Case studies examining the economic impacts of new forest practices regulations on NIPF landowners. In: Teeter L., Cashore B., and Zhang D. (Eds). Forest Policy for Private Forestry: Global and Regional Challenges (2003), Cabi Publishing, Inc., New York 203-210