Regulatory programs and private forestry: State government actions to direct the use and management of forest ecosystems

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 195-209

  Ellefson, Paul V ^a   Cheng, Antony S ^b   Moulton, Robert J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b American Forests   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Forestry practices; Private landowners; Regulatory programs; State government

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY PRACTICE; FORESTRY REGULATION; REGULATORY PROGRAMME;

USA;

EID: 0030829033     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941929709381018     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alden, A. M., C. R. Blinn, P. V. Ellefson, and P. G. Nordin. 1995. Timber harvester perceptions of benefits and costs of applying water quality best management practices in Minnesota. Staff Paper Series No. 108. Department of Forest Resources. University of Minnesota. St. Paul, MN
2. Cheng, A. S., and P. V. Ellefson. 1993a. State programs directed at the forestry practices of private forest landowners: Program administrators’ assessment of effectiveness. Staff Paper Series No. 87. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources.
3. Cheng, A. S., and P. V. Ellefson. 1993b. State forest practices laws and regulations: A review of constitutional and legal environments. Staff Paper Series No. 88. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources.
4. Colla, J. 1991. Evaluation of the 1990 anti-degradation local working committee process. Report No. 3-91 FPA. Boise, ID: Idaho Department of State Lands.
5. Cubbage, F. W., and W. C. Siegel. 1985. The law regulating private forest practices. Journal of Forestry 83:538-545.
6. Ellefson, P. V. 1992. Forest resources policy: Process, participants, and programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Ellefson, P. V., A. S. Cheng, and R. J. Moulton. 1995. Regulation of private forestry practices by state governments. Bulletin SB-605-1995. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
8. Ellefson, P. V., and F. W. Cubbage. 1980. State forest practice laws and regulations: A review and case study for Minnesota. Bulletin 536-1980. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
9. Ellefson, P. V., and P. D. Miles. 1985. Protecting water quality in the Midwest: Impact on timber harvesting costs. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 2(2):57-61.
10. Green, K., S. Bemath, L. Lackey, M. Brunengo, and S. Smith. 1993. Analyzing the cumulative effects of forest practices: Where do we start? Geo Info Systems 3(2):31-41.
11. Henly, R. K. 1992. Cost of small landowner timber harvesting plans. Working Paper. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Strategic and Resources Planning Group.
12. Henly, R. K., and P. V. Ellefson. 1986. State forest practice regulation in the U.S.: Administration, cost, and accomplishments. Bulletin AD-SB-3011. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Agriculture Experiment Station.
13. Hickman, C. A., and M. R. Hickman. 1990. Legal limitations on governmental regulation of private forestry in the United States. In Forestry legislation: Report of the IUFRO working party S4.08-03. Vienna, Austria: International Union of Forestry Research Organizations.
14. Hickman, C. A., and C. E. Martus. 1991. Local regulation of private forestry practices in the eastern United States. In Proceedings 1991 Southern Forest Economics Workers Conference. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
15. Hoberg, G. 1993. Regulating forestry: A comparison of institutions and policies in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Working Paper 185. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia, Department of Political Science.
16. Hoskisson, R. E„ C. W. L. Hill, and H. Kim. 1993. The multidivisional structure: Organizational fossil or source of value? Journal of Management 19:269-298.
17. Idaho Department of Lands. 1992. Rules and regulations pertaining to Idaho Forest Practices Act. ID Admin. Rules IDAPA 20.15. Boise, ID: Idaho Department of Lands.
18. Lickwar, P. M„ F. W. Cubbage, and C. A. Hickman. 1990. Current Southern state programs for control of forestry nonpoint source pollution. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 14(2):64-69.
19. Lickwar, P. M., C. Hickman, and F. W. Cubbage. 1992. Costs of protecting water quality during harvesting on private forestlands in the Southeast. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 161:13-20.
20. Mangin, R„ and M. A. Steger. 1990. The TFW environmental policy negotiations of Washington state. In Conflict resolution and public policy, ed. M. K. Mills, pp. 21-39. New York: Greenwood Press.
21. McNeal, H. L. 1992. Regulatory takings: Societal benefit or violation of owner’s rights? Pennsylvania Law Journal 15(5):18-19.
22. Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. 1992. Cooperative monitoring, evaluation and research: Research and status reports with abstracts 1988-1992. TFW-00-92-001. Olympia, WA: Timber, Fish, and Wildlife Committee.
23. Olson, A. 1989. DNR guidelines for conditioning forest practices applications. Memorandum to the Timber, Fish and Wildlife Administrative Committee, June 28. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Natural Resources. Oregon Forest Practices Act. 1993. ORS 527.610-770,990.
24. Pinchot, G. 1947. Breaking new ground. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
25. Sitkin, S. M., and R. J. Bies. 1993. Legalistic organization: Definitions, dimensions, and dilemmas. Organizational Science 4:345-351.
26. Timber, Fish & Wildlife Committee. 1989. Status and recommendations on cumulative effects of forest practices. Olympia, WA: TFW Policy Group
27. Turner, A. C., and J. O’Laughlin. 1991. State agency rules in Idaho water quality policy: Executive summary. Special Report for Idaho Legislature (No. 5). Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences.
28. Washington Forest Practices Board. 1993. Forest practices rules and regulations (WAC 222). Olympia, WA: Washington Forest Practices Board.