The influence of advance information on the response complexity effect in manual aiming movements

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 154-162

  Khan, Michael A ^a   Mourton, Stuart ^a   Buckolz, Eric ^b   Franks, Ian M ^c  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Motor programming; Reaction time; Response complexity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 36849043099     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adam J.J., Nieuwenstein J.H., Huys R., Paas F.G.W.C., Kingma H., Willems P., et al. Control of rapid aimed hand movements: The one-target advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 295-312
2. Adam J.J., and Paas F.G.W.C. Dwell time in reciprocal aiming tasks. Human Movement Science 15 (1996) 1-24
3. Adam J.J., Paas F.G.W.C., Eyssen I.C.J.M., Slingerland H., Bekkering H., and Drost M.R. The control of two element, reciprocal aiming movements: Evidence for chunking. Human Movement Science 14 (1995) 1-11
4. Adam J.J., van der Bruggen D.P.W., and Bekkering H. The control of discrete and reciprocal target aiming responses: Evidence for the exploitation of mechanics. Human Movement Science 12 (1993) 353-364
5. Aivar M.P., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B.J. Correcting slightly less complex movements. Psicológica 26 (2005) 61-79
6. Chamberlin C.J., and Magill R.A. Preparation and control of rapid multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60 (1989) 256-267
7. Elliott D., Helsen W.F., and Chua R. A century later: Woodworth's two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin 127 (2001) 342-357
8. Fischman M.G. Programming time as a function of number of parts and changes in movement direction. Journal of Motor Behavior 16 (1984) 405-423
9. Helsen W.F., Adam J.J., Elliott D., and Beukers M. The one-target advantage: A test of the movement integration hypothesis. Human Movement Science 20 (2001) 643-674
10. Henry F.M. Use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: A reply to Klapp, Wyatt and Lingo. Journal of motor Behavior 12 (1980) 163-168
11. Henry F.M., and Rogers D.E. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly 31 (1960) 448-458
12. Immink M.A., and Wright D.L. Motor programming during high and low contextual interference practice conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 423-437
13. Ketelaars M.A.C., Garry M.I., and Franks I.M. On-line programming of simple movement sequences. Human Movement Science 16 (1997) 461-483
14. Ketelaars M.A.C., Khan M.A., and Franks I.M. Dual-task interference as an indicator of online programming in simple movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1302-1315
15. Khan M.A., Lawrence G.P., Buckolz E., and Franks I.M. Programming strategies for rapid aiming movements under simple and choice reaction time conditions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 524-542
16. Klapp S.T. Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1015-1027
17. Klapp S.T. Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior 35 (2003) 135-150
18. Klapp S.T., Abbott J., Coffman K., Snider R., and Young F. Simple and choice reaction time methods in the study of motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior 11 (1979) 91-101
19. Klapp S.T., and Erwin C.I. Relation between programming time and the duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2 (1976) 591-598
20. Klapp S.T., Wyatt E.P., and Lingo W.M. Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior 6 (1974) 263-271
21. Lajoie J.M., and Franks I.M. The control of rapid aiming movements: Variations in response accuracy and complexity. Acta Psychologica 97 (1997) 289-305
22. Lavrysen A., Helsen W.F., Tremblay L., Elliott D., Adam J.J., Feys P., et al. The control of sequential aiming movements: The influence of practice and manual asymmetries on the one-target advantage. Cortex 39 (2003) 307-325
23. Rand M.K., Alberts J.L., Stelmach G.E., and Bloedel J.R. The influence of segment difficulty on movements with two stroke sequence. Experimental Brain Research 115 (1997) 137-146
24. Rand M.K., and Stelmach G.E. Segment interdependency and difficulty in two-stroke sequences. Experimental Brain Research 134 (2000) 228-236
25. Ricker K.L., Elliott D., Lyons J., Gauldie D., Chua R., and Byblow W. The utilization of visual information in the control of rapid sequential aiming movements. Acta Psychologica 103 (1999) 103-123
26. Sidaway B. Motor programming as a function of constraints of movement initiation. Journal of Motor Behavior 23 (1991) 120-130
27. Smiley-Oyen A.L., and Worringham C.J. Distribution of programming in a rapid aimed sequential movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 49 (1996) 379-397
28. Sternberg S., Monsell S., Knoll R.R., and Wright C.E. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In: Stelmach G.E. (Ed). Information processing in motor control and learning (1978), Academic Press, New York 117-152
29. Van Donkelaar P., and Franks I.M. The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: Evidence from latency, kinematic and EMG measures. Experimental Brain Research 83 (1991) 618-632