The one-target advantage: A test of the movement integration hypothesis

Human Movement Science

Volumn 20, Issue 4-5, 2001, Pages 643-674

  Helsen, Werner F ^a   Adam, Jos J ^b   Elliott, Digby ^c   Buekers, Martinus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Manual asymmetries; One target advantage; Tapping movements

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVERSAL LEARNING;

EID: 0035511034     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00071-9     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adam, J. J., Nieuwenstein, J. H., Huys, R., Paas, F., Kingma, H., Willems, P., & Werry, M. (2000). Control of rapid aimed hand movements: The one-target advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 295-312.
2. Adam, J. J., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1996). Dwell time in reciprocal aiming tasks. Human Movement Science, 15, 1-24.
3. Adam, J. J., Paas, F. G. W. C., Eyssen, C. J. M., Slingerland, H., Bekkering, H., & Drost, M. (1995). The control of two-element, reciprocal aiming movements: Evidence for chunking. Human Movement Science, 14, 1-11.
4. Annett, M. (1985). Left, Right, Hand and Brain: The Right Shift Theory. London: Erlbaum.
5. Annett, J., Annett, M., Hudson, P. T. W., & Turner, A. (1979). The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 641-652.
6. Binsted, G., Chua, R., Helsen, W. F., & Elliott, D. (2001). Eye-hand coordination in goal-directed aiming. Human Movement Science, 20, this issue.
7. Brown, J. S., & Slater-Hammel, A. T. (1949). Discrete movements in the horizontal plane as a function of their length and direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 84-95.
8. Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia, 15, 617-624.
9. Buekers, M. J., & Helsen, W. F. (2000). Vision and laterality: Does occlusion disclose a feedback processing advantage for the right hand system? Cortex, 36, 507-519.
10. Carlton, L. (1980). Movement control characteristics of aiming responses. Ergonomics, 23, 1019-1032.
11. Carlton, L. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau, & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and Motor Control Advances in Psychology (Vol. 85) (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Carson, R. G., Chua, R., Goodman, D., Byblow, W. D., & Elliott, D. (1995). The preparation of aiming movements. Brain and Cognition, 28, 133-154.
13. Carson, R. G., Elliott, D., Goodman, D., Thyer, L., Chua, R., & Roy, E. A. (1993). The role of impulse variability in manual aiming asymmetries. Psychological Research, 55, 291-298.
14. Chamberlin, C. J., & Magill, R. A. (1989). Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 256-267.
15. Coren, S. (1996). Pathological causes and consequences of left handedness. In D. Elliott, & E. A. Roy (Eds.), Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance (pp. 83-98). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
16. Christina, R. W. (1992). The 1991 C.H. McCloy research lecture: Unraveling the mystery of the response complexity effect in skilled movements. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 218-230.
17. Christina, R. W., Fischman, M. G., Lambert, A. L., & Moore, J. F. (1985). Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: Christina et al. (1982) revisited. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 316-322.
18. Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365-401.
19. Elliott, D., & Allard, F. (1985). The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 37, 407-425.
20. Elliott, D., Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (1999). The control of goal-directed limb movements: Correcting errors in the trajectory. Human Movement Science, 18, 121-136.
21. Elliott, D., Chua, R., & Pollock, B. J. (1994). The influence of intermittent vision on manual aiming. Acta Psychologica, 85, 1-13.
22. Elliott, D., & Roy, E. A. (1996). Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
23. Elliott, D., Roy, E. A., Goodman, D., Carson, R. G., Chua, R., & Maraj, B. K. V. (1993). Asymmetries in the preparation and control of manual aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 570-589.
24. Fischman, M. G. (1984). Programming time as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 405-423.
25. Fischman, M. G., & Lim, C.-H. (1991). Influence of extended practice on programming time, movement time, and transfer in simple target-striking responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 39-50.
26. Fischman, M. G., & Reeve, T. G. (1992). Slower movement times may not necessarily imply on-line programming. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 131-144.
27. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
28. Glencross, D. J. (1980). Response planning and the organization of speed movements. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 107-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Guiard, Y. (1993). On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: Simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychologica, 82, 139-159.
30. Harris, L. J. (1990). Cultural influences on handedness: Historical and contemporary theory and evidence. In S. Coren (Ed.), Left-Handedness: Behavioral Implications and Anomalies Advances in Psychology (Vol. 67) (pp. 195-258). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
31. Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., & Buekers, M. J. (1997). Effects of target eccentricity on temporal costs of point of gaze and the hand in aiming. Motor Control, 1, 161-177.
32. Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., Elliott, D., & Buekers, M. J. (1998a). Manual asymmetries and saccadic eye movements in right-handers during single and reciprocal aiming movements. Cortex, 34, 513-529.
33. Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., Elliott, D., & Ricker, K. L. (1998b). Temporal and spatial coupling of point of gaze and hand movements in aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 249-259.
34. Helsen, W. F., Starkes, J. L., Elliott, D., & Ricker, K. L. (1998c). Sampling frequency and the study of eye-hand coordination in aiming. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 617-623.
35. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a 'memory drum' theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
36. Ivry, R. B. (1986). Force and timing components of the motor program. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 449-474.
37. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
38. Klapp, S. T., & Irwin, C. I. (1976). Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 591-598.
39. McManus, I. C., & Bryden, M. P. (1992). The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance and lateralization. In I. Rapin, & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Child Neuropsychology Handbook of NeuropsyChology (Vol. 6) (pp. 115-144). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
40. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (1993). Exploitation of elasticity as a biomechanical property in the production of graphic stroke sequences. Acta Psychologica, 82, 313-327.
41. Peters, M. (1996). Hand preference and performance in lefthanders. In D. Elliott, & E. A. Roy (Eds.), Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance (pp. 99-120). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
42. Portier, S. J., van Galen, G. P., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (1990). Practice and the dynamics of handwriting performance: Evidence for a shift of motor programming load. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 474-492.
43. Provins, K. A. (1997). Handedness and speech: A critical reappraisal of the role of genetic and environmental factors in the cerebral lateralization of function. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 554-571.
44. Ricker, K. L., Elliott, D., Lyons, J., Gauldie, D., Chua, R., & Byblow, W. (1999). The utilization of visual information in the control of rapid sequential aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 103, 103-123.
45. Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86-102.
46. Roy, E. A., & Elliott, D. (1989). Manual asymmetries in aimed movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 41, 501-516.
47. Sidaway, B. (1991). Motor programming as a function of constraints on movement initiation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 120-130.
48. Smiley-Oyen, A. L., & Worringham, C. J. (1996). Distribution of programming in a rapid aimed sequential movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49, 379-397.
49. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., & Turock, D. L. (1990). Hierarchical control in the execution of action sequences: Tests of two invariance properties. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 3-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
51. Todor, J. I., & Doane, T. (1978). Handedness and hemispheric asymmetry in the control of movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 295-300.