Dual-task interference as an indicator of on-line programming in simple movement sequences

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1302-1315

  Ketelaars, Marion A C ^a   Khan, Michael A ^a,b   Franks, Ian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033433054     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1302     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anson, J. G. (1989). Effects of moment of inertia on simple reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 60-71.
2. Buckolz, E., & Hall, C. (1982). The influence of the similarity of retrieved response tendencies on the ability to simultaneously initiate and/or suppress outputs. Acta Psychologica, 52, 1-21.
3. Canic, M. J., & Franks, I. M. (1989). Response preparation and latency in patterns of tapping movements. Human Movement Science, 8, 123-139.
4. Christina, R. W., & Rose, D. J. (1985). Premotor and motor reaction time as a function of response complexity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 306-315.
5. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
6. Ells, J. G. (1973). Analysis of temporal and attentional aspects of movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 10-21.
7. Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502-507.
8. Fleury, M., Bard, C., Audiffren, M., Teasdale, N., & Blouin, J. (1994). The attentional cost of amplitude and directional requirements when pointing to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 481-495.
9. Franks, I. M., Nagelkerke, P., Ketelaars, M. A. C., & van Donkelaar, P. (1998). Response preparation and control of movement sequences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 93-101.
10. Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1987). The organization of rapid movement sequences as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 66, 237-250.
11. Garcia-Colera, A., & Semjen, A. (1988). Distributed planning of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 341-367.
12. Glencross, D. J. (1980). Response planning and the organization of speed movements. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 107-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Henry, F. M. (1981). The evolution of the memory drum theory of neuromotor reaction. In G. A. Brooks (Ed.), Perspectives on the academic discipline of physical education (pp. 301-322). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor control. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 31, 448-458.
15. Holender, D. (1980). Interference between a vocal and a manual response to the same stimulus. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 421-431). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Hulstijn, W., & van Galen, G. P. (1983). Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 54, 23-49.
17. Keele, S. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387-403.
18. Keele, S. (1973). Attention and human performance. Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
19. Keele, S. W., & Ivry, R. (1991). Does the cerebellum provide a common computation for diverse tasks? A timing hypothesis: The development and neural bases of higher cognitive functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 179-211.
20. Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203, 1029-1031.
21. Ketelaars, M. A. C., Garry, M. I., & Franks, I. M. (1997). On-line programming of simple movement sequences. Human Movement Science, 16, 461-483.
22. Klapp, S. T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 262-267.
23. Klapp, S. T. (1979). Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 7, 375-381.
24. Klapp, S. T. (1981). Temporal compatibility in dual motor tasks II. Simultaneous articulation and hand movements. Memory & Cognition, 9, 398-401.
25. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
26. Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 13-35). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
27. Klapp, S. T., & Greim, D. M. (1979). Programmed control of aimed movements revisited: The role of target visibility and symmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 509-521.
28. Klein, R. M. (1976). Attention and movement. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends (pp. 143-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Lajoie, J. M., & Franks, I. M. (1997a). The control of rapid aiming movements: Variations in response accuracy and complexity. Acta Psychologica, 97, 289-305.
30. Lajoie, J. M., & Franks, I. M. (1997b). Response programming as a function of accuracy and complexity. Human Movement Science, 16, 461-483.
31. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
32. Marteniuk, R., & Mackenzie, C. (1980). Information processing in movement organization and execution. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 29-57). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. McLeod, P. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
34. McLeod, P. (1978). Does probe RT measure central processing demand? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 83-89.
35. McLeod, P. (1980). What can probe RT tell us about the attentional demands of movement? In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 579-589). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and human multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
37. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (in press). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and human multiple task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review.
38. Netick, A., & Klapp, S. T. (1994). Hesitations in manual tracking: A single-channel limit in response programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 766-782.
39. Ostry, D. J. (1980). Execution-time control. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 457-468). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
40. Ostry, D. J. (1983). Determinants of interkey times in typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 225-246). New York: Springer-Verlag.
41. Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-840.
42. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
43. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
44. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1969). Attention demands of movements. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 418-422). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
45. Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munroe, E. M. (1986). Programming of rapid finger sequences. In H. Heuer & C. From (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 64-71). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
46. Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munroe, E. M. (1987). Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences: Tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 193-203.
47. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Patashnik, O. (1980). Time to time in the motor system. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 93-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Saltzman, E. (1984). A motor-program editor. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 51-61). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
49. Sidaway, B. (1991). Motor programming as a function of constraints on movement initiation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 120-130.
50. Sidaway, B., Schoenfelder-Zohdi, B., & Moore, B. (1990). Programming time in serial tapping responses as a function of pathway constraint. Psychological Research, 52, 359-365.
51. Sidaway, B., Sekiya, H., & Fairweather, M. (1995). Movement variability as a function of accuracy demand in programmed serial aiming responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 67-76.
52. Smiley-Oyen, A. L., & Worringham, C. J. (1996). Distribution of programming in a rapid aimed sequential movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 379-397.
53. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., & Turock, D. L. (1990). Hierarchical control in the execution of action sequences: Tests of two invariance properties. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 3-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
55. van Donkelaar, P., & Franks, I. M. (1991a). The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: Evidence from latency, kinematic and EMG measures. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 618-632.
56. van Donkelaar, P., & Franks, I. M. (1991b). Preprogramming versus on-line control in simple movement sequences. Acta Psychologica, 77, 1-19.
57. Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 455-460.