Programming strategies for rapid aiming movements under simple and choice reaction time conditions

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 524-542

  Khan, Michael A ^a   Lawrence, Gavin P ^a   Buckolz, Eric ^b   Franks, Ian M ^c  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33645076815     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000809     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adam, J. J., Nieuwenstein, J. H., Huys, R., Paas, F. G. W. C., Kingma, H., Willems, P., et al. (2000). Control of rapid aimed hand movements: The one-target advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 295-312.
2. Canic, M., & Franks, I. M. (1989). Response preparation and latency patterns of tapping movements. Human Movement Science, 8, 123-139.
3. Carlton, L. G., Carlton, M. J., & Newell, K. M. (1987). Reaction time and response dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 337-360.
4. Chamberlin, C. J., & Magill, R. A. (1989). Preparation and control of rapid multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 256-267.
5. Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357.
6. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
7. Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103-112.
8. Glencross, D. J. (1980). Reponse planning and the organisation of speed movements. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 107-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Helsen, W. F., Adam, J. J., Elliott, D., & Beukers, M. (2001). The one-target advantage: A test of the movement integration hypothesis. Human Movement Science, 20, 643-674.
10. Henry, F. M. (1980). Use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: A reply to Klapp, Wyatt and Lingo. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 163-168.
11. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
12. Immink, M. A., & Wright, D. L. (2001). Motor programming during high and low contextual interference practice conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 423-437.
13. Ketelaars, M. A. C., Garry, M. I., & Franks, I. M. (1997). On-line programming of simple movement sequences. Human Movement Science, 16, 461-483.
14. Ketelaars, M. A. C., Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (1999). Dual-task interference as an indicator of online programming in simple movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1302-1315.
15. Klapp, S. T. (1975). Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 147-153.
16. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
17. Klapp, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 13-35). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
18. Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 135-150.
19. Klapp, S. T., Abbott, J., Coffman, K., Greim, D., Snider, R., & Young, F. (1979). Simple and choice reaction time methods in the study of motor programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 91-101.
20. Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., & Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 368-374.
21. Klapp, S. T., Wyatt, E. P., & Lingo, W. M. (1974). Response programming in simple and choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263-271.
22. Lajoie, J. M., & Franks, I. M. (1997). The control of rapid aiming movements: Variations in response accuracy and complexity. Acta Psychologica, 97, 289-305.
23. Lavrysen, A., Helsen, W. F., Tremblay, L, Elliott, D., Adam, J. J., Feys, P., et al. (2003). The control of sequential aiming movements: The influence of practice and manual asymmetries on the one-target advantage. Cortex, 39, 307-325.
24. McLeod, P. (1978). Does probe RT measure central processing demand? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
25. Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
26. Netick, A., &. Klapp, S. T. (1994). Hesitations in manual tracking: A single-channel limit in response programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 766-782.
27. Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multi-processor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-840.
28. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1969). Attention demands of movements. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 418-422). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
29. Ricker, K. L., Elliott, D., Lyons, J., Gauldie, D., Chua, R., & Byblow, W. (1999). The utilization of visual information in the control of rapid sequential aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 103, 103-123.
30. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T., Jr. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
31. Smiley-Oyen, A. L., & Worringham, C. J. (1996). Distribution of programming in a rapid aimed sequential movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 379-397.
32. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. R., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
33. Van Donkelaar, P., & Franks, I. M. (1991). The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: Evidence from latency, kinematic and EMG measures. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 618-632.