Effects of population size on performance and inbreeding depression in Lupinus perennis

Oecologia

Volumn 154, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 651-661

  Michaels, H J ^a   Shi, X J ^a   Mitchell, R J ^b  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Inbreeding depression; Lupinus perennis; Multiplicative performance; Plant population size; Purging

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BIOMASS; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MEDICINAL PLANT; POLLINATION; POPULATION SIZE; SEED PRODUCTION; SEEDLING EMERGENCE;

ARTICLE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; LUPIN; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLINATION; POPULATION DENSITY; SEEDLING;

INBREEDING; LUPINUS; POLLINATION; POPULATION DENSITY; SEEDLING; SEEDS;

LUPINUS PERENNIS;

EID: 36849035394     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0861-5     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ågren J, Schemske D (1993) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B semiovata. Evolution 47:125-135
2. Bataillon T, Kirkpatrick M (2000) Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet Res 75:75-81
3. Bernhardt CE (2000) Effects of Lupinus perennis population size and local density on pollinator behavior. Biology Master's thesis, University of Akron, Ohio
4. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:479-531
5. Carr DE, Dudash MR (1996) Inbreeding depression in two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Am J Bot 83:586-593
6. Cartwright C (1997) Interpopulation variation in Lupinus perennis, the wild lupine. Masters thesis, Bowling Green State University, Ohio
7. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237-268
8. Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH (2002) Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358
9. Dudash MR (1990) Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible protandrous species Sabatia angularis L (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44:1129-1139
10. Eckert CG, Barrett SCH (1992) Stochastic loss of style morphs from populations of tristylous Lythrum salicaria and Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Evolution 46:1014-1029
11. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217-242
12. Fischer M, Matthies D (1998) The effect of population size on performance in the rare plant Gentianella germanica. J Ecol 86:195-204
13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of the northeastern US and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N.Y.
15. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert C (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:47-80
16. Grigore MT, Tramer E (1996) The short-term effect of fire on Lupinus perennis (L). Nat Areas J 16:41-48
17. Grigore MT, Windus J (1994) Decline of the Karner blue butterfly in the Oak Openings of northwest Ohio. In: Karner blue butterfly: a symbol of a vanishing landscape. (Miscellaneous publication series) Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St Paul, Minn., pp 135-142
18. Grundel R, Pavlovic NB (2000) Nectar plant selection by the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) at the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Am Midl Nat 144:1-10
19. Haack RA (1993) The endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): biology, management considerations, and data gaps. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Central Hardwood Forest Conference, St Paul, Minn.
20. Hauser TP, Loeschcke V (1994) Inbreeding depression and mating-distance dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 7:609-622
21. Hedrick PW (2001) Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol Evol 16:629-636
22. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:139-162
23. Hedrick PW, Savolainen O, Karkkainen K (1999) Factors influencing the extent of inbreeding depression: an example from Scots pine. Heredity 82:441-450
24. Helenurm K, Schaal BA (1996) Genetic load, nutrient limitation, and seed production in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 83:1585-1595
25. Heschel MS, Paige KN (1995) Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conserv Biol 9:126-133
26. Hevner S (2001) Effects of multiple visits by pollinators to flowers on the reproduction of Wild Lupine (Lupinus perennis) L. Masters thesis, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
27. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1995) Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in a diploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Heredity 75:206-215
28. Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359-366
29. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230-241
30. Kirkpatrick M, Jarne P (2000) The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am Nat 155:154-167
31. Kittelson PM, Maron JL (2000) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the perennial yellow bush lupine, Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 87:652-660
32. Kolb A (2005) Reproductive success and offspring survival in fragmented populations of the forest herb Phyteuma spicatum. J Ecol 93:1226-1237
33. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942-952
34. Mavraganis K, Eckert CG (2001) Effects of population size and isolation on reproductive output in Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Oikos 95:300-310
35. Menges ES (1991) Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conserv Biol 5:158-164
36. Morgan JW, Scacco PJ (2006) Planting designs in ecological restoration: insights from the button wrinklewort. Ecol Manage Restor 7:51-54
37. Moseley EL (1928) Flora of the oak openings. Ohio Acad Sci 20:79-134
38. Nuzzo VA (1985) Extent and status of Midwest oak savanna: presettlement and 1985. Nat Areas J 6:6-36
39. Ohio Division of Natural Areas and Preserves (1984) Rare species of native Ohio wild plants status list 1984-1985
40. Ouborg NJ, Van Treuren R (1994) The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction IV ionbreeding load and heterosis in relation to population size in the mint Salvia pratensis. Evolution 48:996-1008
41. Ouborg NJ, Van Treuren R (1995) Variation in fitness-related characters among small and large populations of Salvia pratensis. J Ecol 83:369-380
42. Paland S, Schmid B (2003) Population size and the nature of genetic load in Gentianella germanica. Evolution 57:2242-2251
43. Paschke M, Abs C, Schmid B (2002) Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 89:1250-1259
44. Paschke M, Bernasconi G, Schmid B (2005) Effects of inbreeding and pollen donor provenance and diversity on offspring performance under environmental stress in the rare plant Cochlearia bavarica. Basic Appl Ecol 6:325-338
45. Reed D, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between population fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230-237
46. Reed D, Lowe E, Briscoe D, Frankham R (2003) Inbreeding and extinction: effects of rate of inbreeding. Conserv Genet 4:205-410
47. SAS Institute (2000) SAS/Stat user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
48. Schultz CB, Crone EE (2005) Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conserv Biol 19:887-896
49. Schultz CB, Dlugosch KM (1999) Nectar and hostplant scarcity limit populations of an endangered Oregon butterfly. Oecologia 119:231-238
50. Severns P (2003) Inbreeding and small population size reduce seed set in a threatened and fragmented plant species, Lupinus sulphureus ssp kincaidii (Fabaceae). Biol Conserv 110(2):221-229
51. Shenk GK (2005) Developmentally plastic responses to pollinators by Lupinus perennis flowers and what they tell us about the pollination mechanism in the general Lupine flower. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Conn.
52. Shi XJ (2004) Inbreeding and inbreeding depression in Lupinus perennis. PhD dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
53. Shi XJ, Michaels HJ, Mitchell RJ (2005) Effects of self-pollination and maternal resources on reproduction and offspring performance in the wild lupine, Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae). Sex Plant Reprod 18(2):55-64
54. St Mary M (2007) A study on the effectiveness of transplanting vs seeding of Lupinus perennis in an oak savanna regeneration site. Master's thesis, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
55. Steele RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, New York
56. Swindell WR, Bouzat J (2006a) Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila mealnogaster: evidence for purging. J Evol Biol 19:1257-1264
57. Swindell WR, Bouzat J (2006b) Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment. Evolution 60:1014-1022
58. Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1999) Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res 74:165-178
59. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Fischer M (2005) A threefold genetic Allee effect: population size affects cross-compatibility, inbreeding depression and drift load in the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Genetics 169:2255-2265
60. Whitlock MC (2000) Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 54:1855-1861
61. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114-138
62. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of the habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413-418
63. Young AG, Brown AHD, Zich FA (1999) Genetic structure of fragmented populations of the endangered daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Conserv Biol 13:256-265
64. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723-738