Effects of self-pollination and maternal resources on reproduction and offspring performance in the wild lupine, Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae)

Sexual Plant Reproduction

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 55-64

  Shi, X J ^a   Michaels, H J ^a   Mitchell, R J ^b  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass; Inbreeding depression; Lupinus perennis; Resource addition; Seed production; Selfing; Survival

Indexed keywords

FABACEAE; LUPINUS PERENNIS;

EID: 26644458609     PISSN: 09340882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00497-005-0250-3     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bernhardt CE (2000) Effect of Lupinus perennis population size and local density on pollinator behavior. Biology. Master's Thesis, University of Akron, pp 41
2. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Van Putten WF (1999) Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 12:1125-1137
3. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:479-531
4. Casper BB (1984) On the evolution of embryo abortion in the herbaceous perennial Cryptantha flava. Evolution 38:1337-1349
5. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237-268
6. Cheptou P-O, Berger A, Blanchard A, Collin C, Escarre J (2000) The effect of drought stress on inbreeding depression in four populations of the Mediterranean outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Heredity 85:294-302
7. Dahlgaard J, Hoffmann AA (2000) Stress resistance and environmental dependency of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Conserv Biol 14:1187-1192
8. Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V (1997) Effects of inbreeding in three life stages of Drosophila buzzatii after embryos were exposed to a high temperature stress. Heredity 78:410-416
9. Dahlgaard J, Krebs RA, Loeschcke V (1995) Heat-shock tolerance and inbreeding in Drosophila buzzatii. Heredity 74:157-163
10. Dolan RW (1994) Patterns of isozyme variation in relation to population size, isolation, and phytogeographic history in royal catchfly (Silene regia; Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 81:965-972
11. Dudash MR (1990) Relative performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible protandrous species Sabatis angularis L. Gentianaceae A comparison in three environments. Evolution 44:1129-1139
12. Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2001) The role of breeding system and inbreeding depression in the maintenance of an outcrossing mating strategy in Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 88:1953-1959
13. Gleason HA, Cronquist A(1991) Manual of vascular plants of the northeastern US and adjacent Canada. Bronx, New York, New York Botanical Garden
14. Grigore MT, Tramer E (1996) The short-term effect of fire on Lupinus perennis (L.). Nat Areas J 16:41-48
15. Grigore MT, Windus J (1994) Decline of the Karner Blue butterfly in the Oak Openings of Northwest Ohio. In: Andow DA, Baker RJ, Lane CP (eds) Karner Blue butterfly. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, pp 135-142
16. Haack RA (1993) The endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): biology, management considerations, and data gaps. Paper read at the proceedings of the 9th central hardwood forest conference, at St. Paul, Minnesota
17. Harper J (1977) Population biology of plants. New York, Academic
18. Hauser TP, Loeschcke V (1994) Inbreeding depression and mating-distance dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 7:609-622
19. Hayes CN, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (2004) Inbreeding influences herbivory in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). Oecologia 140:601-608
20. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:139-162
21. Helenurm K, Schaal BA (1996) Genetic load, nutrient limitation, and seed production in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 83:1585-1595
22. Heywood JS (1993) Biparental inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible annual plant Gaillardia pulchella (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 80:545-550
23. Huffman AA, Parsons PA (1991) Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford
24. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1995) Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in a diploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Heredity 75:206-215
25. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70
26. Jimenez JA, Hughes KA, Alaks G, Graham L, Lacy RC (1994) An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266:271-273
27. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado, USA
28. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230-241
29. Kelley SD (1998) Effects of microsite variation and germination preferences on Lupinus perennis establishment in oak savannah. Master's Thesis, Bowling Green State University
30. Kittelson PM, Maron JL (2000) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the perennial yellow bush lupine, Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 87:652-660
31. Krebs SL, Hancock JF (1990) Early-acting inbreeding depression and reproductive success in the highbush blueberry Vacciniium corymbosum L. Theor Appl Genet 79:825-832
32. Levri MA, Real LA (1998) The role of resources and pathogens in mediating the mating system of Kalmia latifolia. Ecology 79:1602-1609
33. Martin ME, Lee TD (1993) Self pollination and resource availability affect ovule abortion in Cassia fasciculata (Caesalpiniaceae). Oecologia 94:503-509
34. Melser C, Klinkhamer PGL (2001) Selective seed abortion increases offspring survival in Cynoglossum offinale (Boraginaceae). Am J Bot 88:1033-1040
35. Miller PS (1994) Is inbreeding depression more severe in a stressful environment? Zoo Biol 13:195-208
36. Mitchell-Olds T, Waller DM (1985) Relative performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 39:533-544
37. Montalvo AM (1994) Inbreeding depression and maternal effects in Aquilegia caerulea, a partially selfing plant. Ecology 75:2395-2409
38. NatureServe (2005) NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 4.2. URL http://www.natureserve.org/explorer
39. Norman JK, Sakai AK, Weller SG, Dawson TE (1995) Inbreeding depression in morphological and physiological traits of Schiedea lydgatei (Caryophyllaceae) in two environments. Evolution 49:297-306
40. Ohio Division of Natural Areas and Preserves (1996) Rare native ohio plants: 1996-1997. Status list. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Colombus, OH, 29 pp
41. Olfelt JP, Furnier GR, Luby JJ (1998) Reproduction and development of the endangered Sedum integrifolium ssp. Leedyi (Crassulaceae). Am J Bot 85:346-351
42. Pray LA, Schwartz JM, Goodnight CJ, Stevens L (1994) Environmental dependency of inbreeding depression: implications for conservation biology. Conserv Biol 8:562-568
43. Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. George Allen and Unwin, London
44. Roach DA, Wulff RD (1986) Maternal effects in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:209-235
45. Rocha OJ, Stephenson AG (1991) Effects of nonrandom seed abortion on progeny performance in Phaseolus coccineus L. Evolution 45:1198-1208
46. SAS Institute Inc (2000) SAS/Stat User's Guide, Version 8. Cary NC, SAS Institute
47. Schaal BA (1980) Measurement of gene flow in Lupinus texensis. Nature 284:450-451
48. Scheiner SM (1993) MANOVA: multiple response variables and multispecies interactions. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York
49. Schemske DW (1983) Breeding system and habitat effects on performance components in three neotropical Costus (Zingiberaceae). Evolution 37:523-539
50. Schemske DW, Husband BC, Ruckelshaus MH, Goodwillie C, Parker IM, Bishop JG (1994) Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584-607
51. Schmitt J, Ehrhardt DW (1990) Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and supression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44:269-278
52. Seavey SR, Bawa KS (1986) Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot Rev 52:195-219
53. Shapiro AM (1974) Partitioning of resources among lupine-feeding Lepidoptera. Am Midl Nat 91(1): 243-248
54. Shi XJ (2004) Inbreeding and inbreeding depression in the wild lupine. PhD Dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green Ohio. p 93
55. Shuey JA, Calhoun JV, Iftner DC (1987) Butterflies that are endangered, threatened and of special concern in Ohio. Ohio J Sci 87(4):98-106
56. Simpson GG, Roe A, Lewontin RC (1960) Quantitative zoology. Harcourt, Brace, and Company, New York
57. Stephenson AG, Winsor JA (1986) Lotus corniculatus regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion. Evolution 40:453-458
58. US Fish and Wildlife and Plants (1992) Department of the interior. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants. Determination of endangered status for the Karner blue butterfly. Final rule. Federal register, December 14, 52(240) 59236-59244
59. Uyenoyama MK, Holsinger KE, Waller DM (1993) Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 9:327-381
60. Waller DM (1984) Differences in performance between seedlings derived from cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 38:427-440
61. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
62. Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723-738