Assessing the Business Capstone Course Through a Method Based on the SOTL and the Stakeholder Process

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 69-74

  Payne, Stephen L ^a   Whitfield, J Michael ^a   Flynn, Jo Ann ^a  

^a GEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749011702     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320209599700     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). 1994. Achieving quality and continuous improvement through self-evaluation and peer review: Standards for accreditation in business administration and accounting, St. Louis: Author. (Section C)
2. Angelo, T., and Cross, K. P., 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers, 2nd ed., San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
3. Atkinson, M. P., 2001. The scholarship of teaching and learning: Reconceptualizing scholarship and transforming the academy. Social Forces, 79: 1217–1229.
4. Benjamin, J., 2000. The scholarship of teaching in teams: What does it look like in practice?. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (2): 191–204.
5. Bilimoria, D., 1999. Assessment and development teaching contributions. Journal of Management Education, 23: 8–12.
6. Boyer, E., 1990. Scholarship revisited, priorities of the professorate: Special report of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.
7. Cerbin, W., 1994. The course portfolio as a tool for continuous improvement of teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5 (1): 95–105.
8. Cerbin, W., 1996. “ Inventing a new genre: The course portfolio at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse ”. In Making teaching community property, Edited by: Hutchings, P., 52–56. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
9. Cohen, J., 1997. Learning the scholarship of teaching in doctorate-granting institutions. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 51 (4): 27–38.
10. Cross, K. P., and Steadman, M. H., 1996. Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Decker, J. N., Teaching management as liberal art and social function. Paper presented as part of a Management Education/Development symposium at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Chicago.
12. De Witt, B., Strategic management as the management of strategy tensions. Paper presented as part of a symposium in the Management Education/Development Division at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Toronto.
13. Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., and Quinlan, K., 1991. The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship of teaching, Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
14. Freeman, R. E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Healey, M., 2000. Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (2): 169–189.
16. Hutchings, P., 1996. Making teaching community property: A menu for peer collaboration and peer review, Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
17. Hutchings, P., and Shulman, L. S., 1999. The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31 (5): 10–15.
18. Jacobi, M., Astin, A., and Ayala, F., 1987. College student outcomes assessment: A talent perspective ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7
19. Kraft, R. G., 2000. Teaching excellence and the inner life of faculty. Change, 32 (3): 48–52.
20. Kreber, C., 1999. A course-based approach to the development of teaching-scholarship; A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 4: 309–325.
21. Kreber, C., and Cranton, P. A., 1997. Teaching as scholarship: A model for instructional development. Issues and Inquiry in College Learning and Teaching, 19 (2): 4–13.
22. Liedtka, J. M., and Rosenblum, J. W., 1998. Teaching strategy as design: A report from the field. Journal of Management Education, 22: 285–303.
23. McKeachie, W. J., and Kaplan, B. T., 1996. Persistent problems in evaluating college teaching. AAHE Bulletin, 48 (6): 5–8.
24. Menges, R. T., and Weimer M., & Associates. 1996. Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Meyer, R., Instruction vs. debate: Using a dialectical approach to teaching strategic management. Paper presented as part of a symposium in the Management Education/Development Division at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Toronto.
26. Mu, S., and Gnyawali, D., Synergistic knowledge development in cross-major student groups: An empirical examination. Paper presented in the Management Education/Development Division at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Toronto.
27. Neary, B. U., The scholarship of teaching sociology: Process versus content focus. Paper presented at the Southern Sociological Society. Sociological Abstracts Accession Number 2001S40135
28. Nelson, R. E., Bass, K. C., and Vance, C., 1994. Managed group formation: An approach to team formation in policy courses. Journal of Education for Business, 70: 25–29.
29. Panici, D. A., 1999. Methods of assessing teaching: Investigating the how and why. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 54 (2): 61–72.
30. Peattie, K., 1990. Pretending to understand business policy. Management Education and Development, 21: 287–300.
31. Prince, W. W., Helms, M. M., and Haynes, P. L., 1993. Project-focused library instruction in business strategy courses. Journal of Education for Business, 68: 179–183.
32. Redmond, M. V., 1998. Outcomes assessment and the capstone course in communication. Southern Communication Journal, 64 (1): 68–75.
33. Richlin, L., ed. 1993. “ Preparing faculty for the new conceptions of scholarship ”. In New Directions for Teaching and Learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. No. 54
34. Schon, D. A., 1995. The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27 (6): 26–34.
35. Thomas, A. S., 1998. The business policy course: Multiple methods for multiple goals. Journal of Management Education, 22: 484–497.
36. Wiener, N., 1948. Cybernetics: Control and communication in the animal and the machine, New York: Wiley.
37. Wolfe, J., 1997. The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28: 360–376.