Methods of Assessing Teaching: Investigating the how and why

Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 61-72

  Panici, Daniel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005614129     PISSN: 10776958     EISSN: 21614326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107769589905400206     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boyer E., (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. N.Y.: Harper & Row, Publishers.
2. Boyer E., (1990). Scholarship revisited, priorities of the professorate: Special report of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.
3. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.
4. Bloom A., (1987). The closing of the American mind. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster.
5. Cohen J., (1997). Learning the scholarship of teaching in doctorate-granting institutions. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 51 (4), 27–38.
6. D'Apollonia S., Abrami P. C., (November, 1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52 (11), 1198–1208.
7. Diamond R., (1995). Preparing for promotion and tenure review: A faculty guide. Boston: Anker Publishing Co, Inc.
8. Greenwald A. G., Gillmore G. M., (November, 1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52 (11); 1209–1217.
9. Keig L. W., Waggoner M. D., (1995). Peer review of teaching: Improving college instruction through formative assessment. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 6 (3), 51–83.
10. Lang J. M., Bain K. R., (December, 1997). Recasting the teaching portfolio. The Teaching Professor 11 (10), 1.
11. McKeachie W. J., (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use. American Psychologist 52 (11), 1218–1225.
12. McKeachie W. J., Kaplan M., (February, 1996). Persistent problems in evaluating college teaching. AAHE Bulletin 48 (6), 5–8.
13. Potter W. J., (1994). Teaching evaluations. In Christ W. G., Assessing communication education: A handbook for media, speech, and theatre educators (pp. 89–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Richlin L., Manning B., (1995). Evaluating college and university teaching: Principles and decisions for designing a workable system. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 6 (3), 3–15.
15. Scriven P., (1980). Successful faculty evaluation programs: A practical guide to improve faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Crugers, N.Y.: Coventry Press.
16. Seldin P., (October, 1993). How colleges evaluate professors: 1983 v. 1993. AAHE Bulletin 46 (2), 5–8.
17. Seldin P., (1997). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Boston: Anker Publishing Co., Inc.
18. Soderberg L. O., (1986). A credible model: Evaluating classroom teaching in higher education. Instructional Evaluation, 8, 13–27.
19. Vangelisti A. L., (1990). Evaluating the process. In Daly J. A., Friedrich G. W., Vangelisti A. L., Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods. (361–377). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.