Frequency dependence of gold nanoparticle superassembly by dielectrophoresis

Langmuir

Volumn 23, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 12450-12456

  Gierhart, Brian C ^a   Howitt, David G ^a   Chen, Shiahn J ^b   Smith, Rosemary L ^b   Collins, Scott D ^b  

^a University of California Davis   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIELECTROPHORESIS; FREQUENCY REGIMES; NANOPARTICLE ASSEMBLIES; SUPERASSEMBLY;

DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTROPHORESIS; GOLD; MICROSTRUCTURE;

NANOPARTICLES;

GOLD; METAL NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DERIVATIVE; SILICON NITRIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROPHORESIS; FLOW KINETICS; HYDROPHOBICITY; METHODOLOGY; MICROELECTRODE; OSMOSIS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROPHORESIS; GOLD; HYDROPHOBICITY; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICROELECTRODES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; OSMOSIS; RHEOLOGY; SILICON COMPOUNDS;

EID: 36649012388     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la701472y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Duan, X. F.; Huang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Wang, J. F.; Lieber, C. M. Nature 2001, 409, 66-69.
2. Daniel, M. C.; Astruc, D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293-346.
3. Baughman, R. H.; Zakhidov, A. A.; de Heer, W. A. Science 2002, 297, 787-792.
4. Cui, Y.; Lieber, C. M. Science 2001, 291, 851-853.
5. Fischbein, M. D.; Drndic, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 063116.
6. Giannuzzi, L. A.; Stevie, F. A. Introduction to Focused Ion Beams: Instrumentation, Theory, Techniques, and Practice; Springer: New York, 2005.
7. Piner, R. D.; Zhu, J.; Xu, F.; Hong, S. H.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1999, 283, 661-663.
8. Xu, S.; Liu, G. Y. Langmuir 1997, 13, 127-129.
9. Vettiger, P.; Despont, M.; Drechsler, U.; Durig, U.; Haberle, W.; Lutwyche, M. I.; Rothuizen, H. E.; Stutz, R.; Widmer, R.; Binnig, G. K. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2000, 44, 323-340.
10. Hughes, M. P. Nanoelectromechanics in Engineering and Biology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
11. Khondaker, S. I.; Yao, Z. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 87, 4613-4615.
12. Khondaker, S. I.; Yao, Z.; Cheng, L.; Henderson, J. C.; Yao, Y. X.; Tour, J. M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 645-647.
13. Amlani, I.; Rawlett, A. M.; Nagahara, L. A.; Tsui, R. K. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 2002, 20, 2802-2805.
14. Amlani, I.; Rawlett, A. M.; Nagahara, L. A.; Tsui, R. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 2761-2763.
15. Trau, M.; Saville, D. A.; Aksay, I. A. Langmuir 1997, 13, 6375-6381.
16. Bernard, L.; Calame, M.; Molen, S. J. v. d.; Liao, J.; Schönenberger, C. Nanotechnology 2007, 235202.
17. Ozturk, B.; Talukdar, I.; Flanders, B. N. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 183105.
18. Chen, Z.; Yang, Y.; Chen, F.; Qing, Q.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Z. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11420-11423.
19. Yamamoto, K.; Akita, S.; Nakayama, Y. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1998, 31, L34.
20. Krupke, R.; Hennrich, F.; Lohneysen, H. v.; Kappes, M. M. Science 2003, 301, 344-347.
21. Hermanson, K. D.; Lumsdon, S. O.; Williams, J. P.; Kaler, E. W.; Velev, O. D. Science 2001, 294, 1082-1086.
22. Lumsdon, S. O.; Scott, D. M. Langmuir 2005, 21, 4874-4880.
23. Boccaccini, A. R.; Roether, J. A.; Thomas, B. J. C.; Shaffer, M. S. P.; Chavez, E.; Stoll, E.; Minay, E. J. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 114, 1-14.
24. Bhatt, K. H.; Velev, O. D. Langmuir 2004, 20, 467-476.
25. Dimaki, M.; Boggild, P. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 759-763.
26. Kretschmer, R.; Fritzsche, W. Langmuir 2004, 20, 11797-11801.
27. Yuan, Y. J.; Andrews, M. K.; Marlow, B. K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 130-132.
28. Negi, A. S.; Sengupta, E.; Sood, A. K. Langmuir 2005, 27, 11623-11627.
29. This cleaning process was undertaken to improve the repeatability of results in accordance with prior work.
30. Five nanometer particles range from 4.5 to 6.5 nm, 15 nm particles range from 14.0 to 16.5 nm, and 20 nm particles range from 18.5 to 22.5 nm in diameter.
31. A 10× probe was used to prevent loading the circuit unduly with oscilloscope or cable impedance.
32. Abramoff, M. D.; Magelhaes, P. J.; Ram, S. J. Biophoton. Int. 2004, 11, 36-42.
33. Pohl, H. A. Dielectrophoresis: The Behavior of Neutral Matter in Nonuniform Electric Fields; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1978; pp 38-47.
34. Muskens, O. L.; Fatti, N. D.; Vallee, F.; Huntzinger, J. R.; Billaud, P.; Broyer, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 063109.
35. Jones, T. B. Electromechanics of Particles; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, 1995; p 140.
36. Pohl gives this same expression with 1/√2π instead of 1.7.
37. Ramos, A.; Morgan, H.; Green, N. G.; Castellanos, A. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1998, 37, 2338-2353.
38. Pohl calls this thermally assisted dielectrophoresis (TAD) and discusses its usefulness in stirring and cooling solutions.
39. Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1993; pp 6-10.
40. Gray, D. M. In Water Encyclopedia; Lehr, J. H., Keeley, J. W., Lehr, J. K., Kingery, T. B., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2005; pp 429-433.
41. Green, N. G.; Ramos, A.; Gonzalez, A.; Morgan, H.; Castellanos, A. Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2000, 61, 4011-4018.
42. Ramos, A.; Gonzalez, A.; Castellanos, A.; Green, N. G.; Morgan, H. Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2003, 67, 056302.
43. This velocity is always in the same direction, because the image charge and tangential field both change sign simultaneously as the ac electric field is applied.
44. Gong, T. Y.; Wu, D. T.; Marr, D. W. M. Langmuir 2002, 18, 10064-10067.
45. Maier, S. A.; Kik, P. G.; Atwater, H. A.; Meltzer, S.; Harel, E.; Koel, B. E.; Requicha, A. A. G. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 229-232.