Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 328-340

  Chmarra, M K ^a   Grimbergen, C A ^a   Dankelman, J ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Motion analysis; Objective assessment; Skills; Tracking system

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; DEVICE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REVIEW; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGICAL OBSERVATION IDENTIFIERS NAMES AND CODES; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 36549010510     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: 13652931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645700701702135     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Arregui, M. E., Fitzgibbons, R. J., Kathouda, N. and McKernan, J. B. (1995) Principles of laparoscopic surgery: Basic and advanced techniques, New York Inc., Springer-Verlag
2. Dankelman, J., Chmarra, M. K., Verdaasdonk, E. G. G. and Stassen, L. P. S. (2005) Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills. Minim Invasiv Ther, 14, pp. 247-256.
3. Aggarwal, R., Moorthy, K. and Darzi, A. (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg, 91, pp. 1549-1558.
4. Gallagher, A. G., Lederman, A. B., McGlade, K. and Satava, R. M. (2004) Discriminative validity of the minimally invasive surgical trainer in virtual reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 660-665.
5. McClusky, D. A. M., van Sickle, K. and Gallagher, A. G. Relationship between motion analysis, time, accuracy, and errors during performance of a laparoscopic suturing task on an augmented reality simulator. 12th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Barcelona
6. Munz, Y., Kumar, B. D., Moorthy, K. and Bann, S. (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: Is one superior to the other?. Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 485-494.
7. Cotin, S., Stylopoulos, N., Ottensmeyer, M. and Neumann, P. (2002) Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Trainers: The Weakest Link!. LNCS, 2488, pp. 35-43.
8. Darzi, A., Smith, S. and Taffinder, N. (1999) Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. BMJ, 318, pp. 887-888.
9. Martin, J. A., Regehr, G., Reznick, R. and MacRae, H. (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for surgical residents. Brit J Surg, 84, pp. 273-278.
10. Moorthy, K., Munz, Y., Sarker, S. K. and Darzi, A. (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ, 327, pp. 1032-1037.
11. Van Sickle, K. R., McKlusky, D. A., Gallagher, A. G. and Smith, C. D. (2005) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc, 19, pp. 1227-1231.
12. Acosta, E. and Temkin, B. (2005) Haptic laparoscopic skills trainer with practical user evaluation metrics. Stud Health Techn Inform. MMVR, 111, pp. 8-11.
13. Cavallo, F., Megali, G., Sinigaglia, S. and Tonet, O. (2006) A biomechanical analysis of surgeon's gesture in a laparoscopic virtual scenario. Stud Health Techn Inform. MMVR, 119, pp. 79-84.
14. Heijnsdijk, E. A. M., Pasdeloup, A., van der Pijl, A. J. and Dankelman, J. (2004) The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically. Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 980-985.
15. Bholat, O. S., Haluck, R. S., Kutz, R. H. and Gorman, P. J. (1999) Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform, 62, pp. 62-66.
16. Bholat, O. S., Haluck, R. S., Murray, W. B. and Gorman, P. J. (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg, 189, pp. 349-355.
17. Lacey, G. A Surgical Training Simulator.
18. van Sickle, K. R., McClusky, D. A., Gallagher, A. G. and Smith, C. D. (2005) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc, 19, pp. 1227-1231.
19. Sokollik, C., Gross, J. and Buess, G. (2004) New model for skills assessment and training progress in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 495-500.
20. Tatar, F., Mollinger, J. R., Dulk, R. C. Den and van Duyl, W. A. (2002) Ultrasonic sensor for measuring position and orientation of laparoscopic instruments in minimally invasive surgery. 2nd Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Madison, Wisconsin USA
21. Tatar, F., Bastemeijer, J., Mollinger, J. R. and Bossche, A. (2005) Two-frequency method for measuring the position of surgical tools with μm precision. Eurosensors XIX Conference, Barcelona, Spain
22. Rosenberg, L. B. Computer interface or control input device for laparoscopic surgical instrument and other elongated mechanical objects.
23. Jacobus, C. J. and Griffin, J. L. Method and system for simulating medical procedures including virtual reality and control method system for use therein.
24. Jacobus, C. J., Riggs, A. J. and Taylor, M. J. Force feedback system.
25. Martin, K. M., Levin, M. D. and Rosenberg, L. B. Mechanical interface having multiple grounded actuators.
26. Rosenberg, L. B. Physically realistic computer simulation on medical procedures.
27. Stylopoulos, N., Cotin, S., Dawson, S. and Ottensmeyer, M. (2003) CELTS: a clinically-based computer enhanced laparoscopic training system. Stud Health Technol Inform, 94, pp. 336-342.
28. Stylopoulos, N., Cotin, S., Maithel, S. K. and Ottensmeyer, M. (2004) Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): Bridging the gap. Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 782-789.
29. Hanna, G. B., Drew, T., Clinch, P. and Hunter, B. (1996) A microprocessor-controlled psychomotor tester for minimal access surgery. Surg Endosc, 10, pp. 965-969.
30. Hanna, G. B., Drew, T., Clinch, P. and Hunter, B. (1998) Computer-controlled endoscopic performance assessment system. Surg Endosc, 12, pp. 997-1000.
31. Demirtas, D., Post, J. J. and Dankelman, J. Joystick.
32. Rosen, J., Brown, J. D., Chang, L. and Barreca, M. (2002) The BlueDRAGON-a system for measuring the kinematics and the dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in-vivo. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation ICRA, Washington, DC
33. Rosen, J., Brown, J. D., Barreca, M. and Chang, L. (2002) The Blue DRAGON-A system for Monitoring the Kinematics and Dynamics of Endoscopic Tools in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Objective Laparoscopic Skill Assessment. Stud Health Techn Inform. MMVR, 85, pp. 412-418.
34. Vecerina, I., Zoethout, J. and Betrisay, S. Device for determining the longitudinal and angular position of a rotationally symmetrical apparatus.
35. Maass, H., Chantier, B. B. A., Cakmak, H. K. and Kuhnapfel, U. G. (2003) How to Add Force Feedback to a Surgery Simulator. LNCS, 2673, pp. 165-174.
36. Kuhnapfel, U., Cakmak, H. K., Chantier, B. and Maass, H. (2004) HapticIO: Haptic Interface-Systems for Virtual-Reality Training in Minimally-Invasive Surgery. Proceedings Internationale Statustagung "Virtuelle und Erweiterte Realitat
37. Maass, H., Cakmak, H. K., Kuhnapfel, U. G. and Trantakis, C. (2005) Providing More Possibilities for Haptic Devices in Surgery Simulation. CARS, International Congress Series, 1281, pp. 725-729.
38. Chmarra, M. K., Bakker, N. H., Grimbergen, C. A. and Dankelman, J. (2006) TrEndo, a device for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments in training set-ups. Sensor Actuat A-Phys, 126, pp. 328-334.
39. Strom, P., Kjellin, A., Hedman, L. and Johnson, E. (2004) Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance. Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 115-120.
40. Smith, C. D., Farrell, T. M., McNatt, S. S. and Metrveli, R. E. (2001) Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg, 181, pp. 547-550.
41. Rosen, J., Brown, J. D., Chang, L. and Sinanan, M. (2006) Generalized Approach for Modeling Minimally Invasive Surgery as a Stochastic Process Using a Discrete Markov Model. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53, pp. 399-413.
42. Chmarra, M. K., Jansen, F. W., Wentink, M. and Grimbergen, C. A. (2006) Performance during distinct phases in laparoscopic surgery. 10th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, p. 112.
43. Schijven, M. and Jakimowicz, J. (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators. How to choose. Surg Endosc, 17, pp. 1943-1950.
44. Halvorsen, F. H., Elle, O. J. and Fosse, E. (2005) Simulators in surgery. Minim Invasiv Ther, 14, pp. 214-223.
45. Cosman, P. H., Cregan, P. C., Martin, C. J. and Cartmill, J. A. (2002) Virtual reality simulators: Current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills. ANZ J Surg, 72, pp. 30-34.
46. Sutherland, L. M., Middleton, P. F., Anthony, A. and Hamdorf, J. (2006) Surgical simulation. A systematical review. Ann Surg, 243, pp. 291-300.
47. Dunkin, B., Adrales, G. L., Apelgren, K. and Mellinger, J. D. (2007) Surgical simulation: A current review. Surg Endosc, 21, pp. 357-366.
48. Massie, T. H. and Salisbury, J. K. (1994) The PHANTOM Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects. Proceedings of the ASME winter annual meeting, symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environments and teleoperator systems, Chicago, IL
49. Datta, V., Mackay, S., Mandalia, M. and Darzi, A. (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg, 193, pp. 479-485.
50. Moorthy, K., Munz, Y., Dossis, A. and Bello, F. (2003) Motion analysis in the training and assessment of minimally invasive surgery. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol, 12, pp. 137-142.
51. Binder, J. and Kramer, W. (2001) Point of technique. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU International, 87, pp. 408-410.
52. Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P. and Meyers, W. C. (2004) Robotic surgery. A current perspective. Ann Surg, 239, pp. 14-21.
53. Nawrat, Z., Malota, Z., Kostka, P. and Religa, Z. (2002) The polish project of telemanipulator for cardiac minimal invasive surgery with preplanning and advisory system - assumptions and actual state of art of RobIn Heart. 8th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Szczecin, Poland
54. Podsedkowski, L., Mianowski, K., Wroblewski, P. and Nawrat, Z. (2002) Kinematic aspects of selected manipulators for cardiac surgery. 8th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, Szczecin, Poland
55. Rosen, J., Lum, M., Trimble, D. and Hannaford, B. (2005) Spherical mechanism analysis of a surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery-analytical and experimental approaches. MMVR, 13, pp. 422-428.
56. Prasad, S. M., Prasad, S. M., Maniar, H. S. and Chu, C. (2004) Surgical Robotics: Impact of Motion Scaling on Task Performance. Am J Surg, 199, pp. 863-868.
57. Lin, H. C., Shafran, I., Murphy, T. E. and Okamura, A. M. (2005) Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Robot-Assisted Surgical Motions. MICCAI, LNCS, 3749, pp. 802-810.
58. Satava, R. M., Cuschieri, A. and Hamdorf, J. (2003) Metrics for objective assessment. Preliminary summary of the Surgical Skills Workshop. Surg Endosc, 17, pp. 220-226.
59. Satava, R. M., Gallagher, A. G. and Pellegrini, C. A. (2003) Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: Definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. J Am Coll Surg, 196, pp. 933-937.
60. Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S. and Maran, N. (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: A review of the literature. Surgery, 139, pp. 140-149.
61. Healey, A. N., Undre, S. and Vincent, C. A. (2004) Developing observational measures of performance in surgical teams. Qual Saf Health Care, 13, pp. 33-40.