Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 62, Issue , 1999, Pages 62-66

  Bholat, Omar S ^a   Haluck, Randy S ^a   Kutz, Richard H ^a   Gorman, Paul J ^a   Krummel, Thomas M ^a  

^a PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; SURGERY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTS; LAPAROSCOPIC INSTRUMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERIES (MIS); MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE TECHNIQUE; SHAPE DISCRIMINATION; TEXTURE DISCRIMINATION;

LAPAROSCOPY;

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;

FEEDBACK; HUMANS; STEREOGNOSIS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 0032605350     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-906-6-62     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Akamatsu M, MacKenzie IS, Hasbroucq T. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics 1995; 38(4): 816-827.
2. Minnard EA, Conlon KC, Hoos A, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasound enhances standard laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Annals of Surgery 1998; 228(2): 182-187.
3. Plinkert PK, Baumann I, Flemming E, et al. The use of a vibrotactile sensor as an artificial sense of touch for tissues of the head and neck. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technology 1998; 7(2): 111-115.
4. Scott HJ, Darzi A. Tactile feedback in laparoscopic colonic surgery. British Journal of Surgery 1997; 84: 1004-1005.
5. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS. Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Archives of Surgery 1997; 132: 200-204.
6. Raibert M, Playter R, Krummel TM. The use of a virtual reality haptic device in surgical training. Academic Medicine 1998; 73(5): 596-597