TrEndo, a device for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments in training setups

Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 328-334

  Chmarra, Magdalena K ^a   Bakker, Niels H ^a,b   Grimbergen, Cornelis A ^a,c,d   Dankelman, Jenny ^a,e,f  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e DUT   (Netherlands)

^f Department of Biomedical Engineering ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gimbal; Instrument tracking; Minimally invasive surgery; Objective assessment; Optical sensor; Training

Indexed keywords

GIMBAL; INSTRUMENT TRACKING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; OPTICAL SENSOR;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; OPTICAL SENSORS; OPTICAL TESTING; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT TRACKING;

EID: 31544459861     PISSN: 09244247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.10.040     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. M.J. Moore, and C.L. Bennett The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am. J. Surg. 170 1995 550 559
2. A.M. Pearson Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying Surg. Endosc. 16 2002 130 137
3. R. Aggarwal Laparoscopic skills training and assessment Br. J. Surg. 91 2004 1549 1558
4. Y. Munz Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg. Endosc. 18 2004 485 494
5. K.R. Wanzel Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification Curr. Prob. Surg. 39 2002 573 660
6. L.S. Feldman Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use? Surgery 135 2004 28 42
7. A. Darzi The challenge of objective assessment of surgical skill Am. J. Surg. 181 2001 484 486
8. A. Darzi Assessing operative skill needs to be become more objective Br. Med. J. 318 1999 887 888
9. J.A. Martin Objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for surgical residents Br. J. Surg. 84 1997 273 278
10. K. Moorthy Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery Br. Med. J. 327 2003 1032 1037
11. J. Shah, and A. Darzi Simulation and skills assessment IEEE Proceedings of the International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality (MIAR'01) 2001 5 9
12. J. Torkington The role of the basic surgical skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills Surg. Endosc. 15 2001 1071 1075
13. A.G. Gallagher Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality World J. Surg. 25 2001 1478 1483
14. A.G. Gallagher Discriminative validity of the minimally invasive surgical trainer in virtual reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance Surg. Endosc. 18 2004 660 665
15. M. Schijven, and J. Jakimowicz Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators. How to choose Surg. Endosc. 17 2003 1943 1950
16. G. Lacey, A Surgical Training Simulator, Patent Number IE20030351.
17. D. Demirtas, et al., Joystick, Patent WO2005088419.
18. L.B. Rosenberg, Physically Realistic Computer Simulation of Medical Procedures, United States Patent Number 6,654,000 B2.
19. L.B. Rosenberg, et al., Computer Apparatus Including Linkage Having Flex, United States Patent Application Number 20040164959 A1.
20. T.W. Ng The optical mouse as a two-dimensional displacement sensor Sens. Actuators A Phys. 107 2003 21 25
21. Agilent, ADNS-2620 Optical Mouse Sensor Data Sheet, http://cp.literature. agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5988-9773EN.pdf.
22. CPN Group, University of Aarhus, http://www.daimi.au.dk/CPNTools.
23. M. Westergaard, Supporting Pointing Devices in Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Summer Workshop for Faculty and PhDs, Cambridge, England, 2002, http://klafbang.dk/personlig/publications.php3.
24. N. Stylopoulos Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS) Surg. Endosc. 18 2004 782 789