Screening of locally isolated lactic acid bacteria for use as probiotics in poultry in Iran

Journal of Poultry Science

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 357-365

  Mojgani, Naheed ^a,c   Torshizi, Mohd A K ^b   Rahimi, Shaban ^b  

^a RAZI VACCINE AND SERUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c Biotechnology Department   (Iran)

Author keywords

Antimicrobial; In vitro; Lactic acid bacteria; Probiotic potential

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; LACTOBACILLUS SALIVARIUS; LISTERIA; NEGIBACTERIA; POSIBACTERIA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 36349005249     PISSN: 13467395     EISSN: 13490486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.44.357     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson JW and Gilliland SE. Effect of fermented milk (yogurt) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus L1 on serum cholesterol in hyper-cholesterolemic humans. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 18: 43-50. 1999.
2. Axelsson LT and Lindgren SE. Characterization and DNA homology of Lactobacillus strains isolated from pig intestine. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 62: 433-440. 1987.
3. Axelsson LT, Chung TC, Dobrogosz WJ and Lindgren SE. Production of a broad spectrum antimicrobial substance by Lactobacillus reuteri. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 2: 131-136. 1989.
4. Bensing BA and Dunny GM. Cloning and molecular analysis of genes affecting expression of binding substances, the recipient-encoded receptor(s) mediating mating aggregate formation in Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Bacteriology, 175: 7421-7429. 1993.
5. Bergey's Manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989.
6. Cesena C, Morelli L, Alander M, Siljander T, Tuomola E, Salminen S, Mattila-Sandholm T Vilpponen-Salmela T and von Wright A. Lactobacillus crispatus and its non-aggregating mutant in human colonization trails. Journal of Dairy Science, 84: 1001-1010. 2001.
7. Chung TC, Axelsson L, Lindgren SE and Dobrogosz WJ. In vitro studies on reuterin by Lactobacillus reuteri. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 2: 137-144. 1989.
8. Corzo G and Gilliland SE. Measurement of Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity from Lactobacillus acidophilus Based on Disappearance of Conjugated Bile Salts 1. Journal of Dairy Science, 82: 466-471. 1999.
9. Draksler D, Gonzales S and Oliver G. Preliminary assays for the development of a probiotic for goats. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 44: 397-405. 2004.
10. Fuller R. Epithelial attachment and other factors controlling the colonization of the intestine of the gnotobiotic chicken by Lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 45: 389-395. 1978.
11. Garriga M, Pascual M, Montfort JM and Hugas M. Selection of lactobacilli for chicken probiotic adjuncts. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 84: 125-132. 1997.
12. Gasson MJ, Swindell S, Maeda S and Dodd HM. Molecular rearrangement of lactose plasmid DNA associated with high-frequency transfer and cell aggregation in Lactococcus lactis 712. Molecular Microbiology, 6: 3213-3223. 1992.
13. Gibson GR, Otaway PB and Robert AR. Prebiotics: New Developments in Functional Foods. Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Limited, London, UK. 2000.
14. Gilliland SE and Speck ML. Deconjugation of bile acids by intestinal lactobacilli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 33: 15-18. 1977.
15. Gilliland SE, Nelson CR and Maxwell C. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 49: 377-381. 1985.
16. Gilliland SE and Walker DK. Factors to consider when selecting a culture of L. acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypercholesterolemia effect in humans. Journal of Dairy Science, 73: 905-909. 1990.
17. Gupta PK, Mital BK and Garg SK. Characterization of L. acidophilus strains for use as dietary adjunct. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 29: 105-109. 1996.
18. Hood SK and Zottola A. Effect of low pH on the ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus to survive and adhere to human intestinal cells. Journal of Food Science, 53: 1514-1516. 1988.
19. Joerger, MC and Klaenhammer, TR. Characterization and purification of helveticin J and evidence for a chromosomally determined bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus helveticus 481. Journal of Bacteriology, 167: 439-446. 1986.
20. Jin L, Marquart R and Zhao X. A strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) inhibits the adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escerichia coli K88 to porcine small intestinal mucus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66: 4200-4202. 2000.
21. Kmet V and Lucchini F. Aggregation-promoting factor in human vaginal Lactobacillus strains. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 19: 111-114. 1997.
22. Kolenbrander PE. Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annual Reviews in Microbiology, 54: 413-439. 2000.
23. Lankaputhra WE and Shah NP. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. in the presence of acid and bile salts. Cultured Dairy Products Journal, 30: 2-7. 1995.
24. Liong MY and Shah NP. Optimization of cholesterol removal by probiotics in the presence of probiotics by using a response surface method. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71: 1745-1753. 2005.
25. Mastromarino P, Brigidi P, Macchia S, Maggi L, Pirovano F, Trinchieri V, Conte U and Matteuzzi D. Characterization and selection of vaginal Lactobacillus strains for the preparation of vaginal tablets. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 93: 884-893. 2002.
26. Mayra-Makinen A, Manninen M and Gyllenberg M. The adherence of lactic acid bacteria to the columnar epithelium cells of pigs and calves. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 55: 241-245. 1983.
27. Miles AA and Misra SS. The estimation of the bactericidal power of blood. Journal of Hygiene, 38: 732-748. 1938.
28. Patterson JA and Burkholder KM. Application of probiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82: 627-631. 2003.
29. Piard JC and Desmazeaud MJ. Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 2. Bacteriocins and other antibacterial substances. Lait, 72: 113-142. 1992.
30. Prasad J, Gill H, Smart J and Gopal PK. Selection and characterization of lactobacillus and bifidobacterium strains for use as probiotics. International Dairy Journal, 12: 993-1002. 1999.
31. Reid G, Cook RL and Bruce AW. Examination of strains of lactobacilli for properties which may influence bacterial interference in the urinary tract. Journal of Urology, 138: 330-335. 1987.
32. Reid G, McGroarty JA, Angotti R and Cook RL. Lactobacillus inhibitor production against Escherichia coli and coaggregation ability with uropathogens. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 34: 344-351. 1988.
33. Reid G and Friendship R. Alternative to antibiotics use: probiotic for the gut. Animal Biotechnology, 13: 97-112. 2002.
34. Reniero R, Cocconcelli P, Bottazzi V and Morelli L. High frequency of conjugation in Lactobacillus mediated by an aggregation-promoting factor. Journal of General Microbiology, 138: 763-768. 1992.
35. Roos S, Lindgren S and Jonsson H. Autoaggregation of Lactobacillus reuteri is mediated by a putative DEAD-box helicase. Molecular Microbiology, 32: 427-436. 1999.
36. Rudel LL and Morris MD. Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. Journal of Lipid Research, 14: 364-366. 1973.
37. Sanders ME. Considerations for use of probiotic bacteria to modulate human health. Journal of Nutrition, 130: 384-390. 2000.
38. Sarra PG, Dellaglio F and Bottazzi V. Taxonomy of Lactobacilli isolated from the alimentary tract of chickens. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 6: 86-89. 1985.
39. Schillinger Y and Lücke FK. Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55: 1901-1906. 1989.
40. Sjovall J. Dietary glycine and taurine on bile acid conjugation in man; bile acids and steroids 75. Proceedings of the Society for Exp Biological Medicine, 100: 676-678. 1959.
41. Soerjadi AS, Stehman SM, Snoeyenbos GH, Wienack OM and Smyser CF. The influence of Lactobacilli on the competitive exclusion of paratyphoid Salmonellae in chickens. Avian Diseases, 25: 1027-1033. 1981.
42. Suskovic J, Kos B, Goreta J and Matosic S. Role of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in synbiotic effect. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 39: 227-235. 2001.
43. Tahri K, Grill JP and Schneider F. Involvement of trihydroxyconjugated bile salts in cholesterol assimilation by bifidobacteria. Currents in Microbiology, 34: 79-84. 1997.
44. Talarico TL and Dobrogosz WJ. Chemical characterization of an antimicrobial substance produced by Lactobacillus reuteri. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 33: 674-679. 1989.
45. Upreti GC and Hinsdill RD. Production and mode of action of Lactocin 27: bacteriocin from a homofermentative lactobacillus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 7: 139-145. 1975.
46. Usman HA. Bile tolerance, taurocholate deconjugation, and binding of cholesterol by Lactobacillus gasseri strains. Journal of Dairy Science, 82: 243-248. 1999.
47. Vandevoorde L, Christiaens H and Verstraete W. Prevalence of coaggregation reactions among chicken lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 72: 214-219. 1992.
48. Wadström T, Andersson K, Sydow M, Axelsson L, Lindgren S and Gullmar B. Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from the small intestine of pigs. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 62: 513-520. 1987.