Preference heterogeneity and choice of cardiac rehabilitation program: Results from a discrete choice experiment

Health Policy

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 124-132

  Kjær, Trine ^a   Gyrd Hansen, Dorte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cardiac rehabilitation; Discrete choice experiments; Preference heterogeneity; Random parameter logit

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; SMOKING HABIT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DENMARK; DIETETICS; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; NURSING SERVICES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); POLICY MAKING; PROGRAMMING, LINEAR; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REHABILITATION;

EID: 36248975315     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ryan M., and Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programs: current practice and future research reflections. Applied Health Econonomic and Health Policy 2 (2003) 55-64
2. Revelt D., and Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1998) 647-657
3. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., and Liljenstolpe C. Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiment. Ecological Economics 47 (2003) 95-103
4. Iraguen P., and Dios Ortuzar J. Willingness-to-pay for reducing fatal accident risk in urban areas: an internet-based web page stated preference survey. Accident Analysis and Prevention 36 (2004) 513-524
5. Train K.E. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74 (1998) 230-239
6. Hensher D., Shore N., and Train K. Households' willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environmental & Resource Economics 32 (2005) 509-531
7. Lijesen M.G. A mixed logit based valuation of frequency in civil aviation from SP-data. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review 42 (2006) 82-94
8. Rigby D., and Burton M. Preference heterogeneity and GM food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32 (2005) 269-288
9. Fiebig D, Louviere J, Waldman DW. Contemporary issues in modelling discrete choice experimental data in health economics. Working Paper. University of New South Wales;2005.
10. Hall J., Kenny P., King M., Louviere J., Viney R., and Yeoh A. Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Economics 11 (2002) 457-465
11. Hall J., Viney R., Haas M., and Louviere J. Using stated preference discrete choice modeling to evaluate health care programs. Journal of Business Research 57 (2004) 1026-1032
12. Johnson F.R., Banzhaf M.R., and Desvousges W.H. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach. Health Economics 9 (2000) 295-317
13. Borah B.J. A mixed logit model of health care provider choice: analysis of NSS data for rual india. Health Economics 15 (2006) 915-932
14. Deb P., Li C.H., Trivedi P.K., and Zimmer D.M. The effect of managed care on use of health care services: results from two contemporaneous household surveys. Health Economics 15 (2006) 743-760
15. Harris K.M., and Keane M.P. A model of health plan choice: inferring preferences and perceptions from a combination of revealed preference and attitudinal data. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1999) 131-157
16. Hedback B., Perk J., Hornblad M., and Ohlsson U. Cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass surgery: 10-year results on mortality, morbidity and readmissions to hospital. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk 8 (2001) 153-158
17. Lavorato L., Grypma S., Spenceley S., Hagen B., and Nowatzki N. Positive outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: the little program that could. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 13 (2003) 13-19
18. Lloyd-Williams F., Mair F.S., and Leitner M. Exercise training and heart failure: a systematic review of current evidence [see comment]. British Journal of General Practice 52 (2002) 47-55
19. Oldridge N., Furlong W., Feeny D., Torrance G., Guyatt G., Crowe J., et al. Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology 72 (1993) 154-161
20. Rees K., Victory J., Beswick A.D., Turner S.C., Griebsch I., Taylor F.C., et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in the UK: uptake among under-represented groups. Heart 91 (2005) 375-376
21. Taylor R.S., Brown A., Ebrahim S., Jolliffe J., Noorani H., Rees K., et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Medicine 116 (2004) 682-692
22. Kuhfeld W.F. Marketing research methods in SAS experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques (2003), SAS Institute Inc.
23. Willaing I., Andreassen A.H., Jørgensen T., and Rokkedal J. Comparison of three hospital-based rehabilitation programs for patients with acute coronary syndrome. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (2004) 11
24. Kjaer T., Gyrd-Hansen D., and Willaing I. Investigating patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 22 (2006) 211-218
25. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers of econometrics (1974), Academic Press, London UK 105-142
26. McFadden D., and Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (2000) 447-470
27. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, UK
28. Louviere J, Eagle T. Confound it! That persky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions. CenSoC Working Paper No. 06-002, University of Technology Sydney;2006.
29. Louviere J., Street D., Carson R., Ainslie A., Deshazo J.R., Cameron T., et al. Dissecting the random component of utility. Marketing Letters 13 (2002) 177-193
30. Louviere J. Complex Statistical Choice Models: are the assumptions true, and if not, what are the consequences? CenSoC Working Paper No. 04-002, University of Technology Sydney;2004.
31. Louviere J. What if consumer experiments impact variances as well as means? Response variability as a behavioral phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2001) 506-511
32. Hensher D.A., and Greene W.H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30 (2003) 133-176
33. Kenneth Train: http://elsa.berkely.edu/∼train.
34. Hensher D.A. The signs of the times: imposing a globally signed condition on willingness to pay distributions. Transportation 33 (2006) 205-222
35. Sillano M., and Ortuzar J.D. Willingness-to-pay estimation with mixed logit models: some new evidence. Environment and Planning A 37 (2005) 525-550
36. Train K., and Weeks M. Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space. In: Alberini A., and Scarpa R. (Eds). Application of simulation methods in environmental resource economics (2005), Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
37. Train K, Sonnier G. Mixed logit with bounded distributions of partworths. Working paper, University of California, Department of Economics.
38. Louviere J. Random utility theory-based stated preferences elicitation methods: application to health economics with special reference to combining sources of preference data. CenSoc Working Paper No. 04-001, University of Technology Sydney;2001.